Literature DB >> 33523707

The Importance of Time Metric Precision When Implementing Bivariate Latent Change Score Models.

Holly P O'Rourke1, Kimberly L Fine1, Kevin J Grimm1, David P MacKinnon1.   

Abstract

The literature on latent change score models does not discuss the importance of using a precise time metric when structuring the data. This study examined the influence of time metric precision on model estimation, model interpretation, and parameter estimate accuracy in bivariate LCS (BLCS) models through simulation. Longitudinal data were generated with a panel study where assessments took place during a given time window with variation in start time and measurement lag. The data were analyzed using precise time metric, where variation in time was accounted for, and then analyzed using coarse time metric indicating only that the assessment took place during the time window. Results indicated that models estimated using the coarse time metric resulted in biased parameter estimates as well as larger standard errors and larger variances and covariances for intercept and slope. In particular, the coupling parameter estimates-which are unique to BLCS models-were biased with larger standard errors. An illustrative example of longitudinal bivariate relations between math and reading achievement in a nationally representative survey of children is then used to demonstrate how results and conclusions differ when using time metrics of varying precision. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Latent difference score models; longitudinal data analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33523707      PMCID: PMC8325722          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1874261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   3.085


  16 in total

1.  Do changes in lifestyle engagement moderate cognitive decline in normal aging? Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Brent J Small; Roger A Dixon; John J McArdle; Kevin J Grimm
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Convergence: an accelerated longitudinal approach.

Authors:  R Q BELL
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1953-06

3.  The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models.

Authors:  Jeremy C Biesanz; Natalia Deeb-Sossa; Alison A Papadakis; Kenneth A Bollen; Patrick J Curran
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-03

4.  The Consequences of Ignoring Variability in Measurement Occasions Within Data Collection Waves in Latent Growth Models.

Authors:  Burak Aydin; Walter L Leite; James Algina
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Analysis of longitudinal data: the integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model.

Authors:  Linda M Collins
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Estimating Age-Based Developmental Trajectories Using Latent Change Score Models Based on Measurement Occasion.

Authors:  Eduardo Estrada; Fumiaki Hamagami; Emilio Ferrer
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Studying developmental processes in accelerated cohort-sequential designs with discrete- and continuous-time latent change score models.

Authors:  Eduardo Estrada; Emilio Ferrer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-04-04

8.  Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models.

Authors:  J J McArdle; D Epstein
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1987-02

9.  Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models.

Authors:  J J McArdle
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Recent Changes Leading to Subsequent Changes: Extensions of Multivariate Latent Difference Score Models.

Authors:  Kevin J Grimm; Yang An; John J McArdle; Alan B Zonderman; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.