Mark McKinney1, Magdalena Kisilewicz2, Ian G Stiell3,4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queensway-Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. istiell@ohri.ca. 4. Clinical Epidemiology Program, F6, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Box 685, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. istiell@ohri.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Safer opioid prescribing remains a crucial issue for emergency physicians. Policy statements and guidelines recommend deliberate risk assessment for likelihood of current or future opioid use disorder prior to prescribing opioids. However, the practice patterns of emergency physicians remain underreported. METHODS: We surveyed emergency physicians across Canada about their local opioid prescribing policies, their practice patterns of risk assessment prior to prescribing opioids, and which clinical risk factors they find most important. RESULTS: The response rate was 20.4% (n = 312/1532). 59.8% of respondents report usually or always assessing for risk. Physicians rely on gestalt (80.3%), targeted histories based on risk factors in the literature (55.6%) or their experience (57.6%), and reviewing medical (83.1%) and medication records (75.6%). Contacting primary prescribers is uncommon (16.3%). A minority routinely use opioid prescribing risk assessment tools (6.4%), have local opioid prescribing policies (27%), or make use of electronic medical record functions to assist risk stratifying (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Many Canadian emergency physicians make risk assessments based on gestalt rather than identifying literature-based risk factors. This conflicts with guidelines calling for routine comprehensive assessment. Further efforts should be directed towards education in optimizing risk assessment; and towards system-level initiatives such as clear local prescribing policies, electronic-systems functionality, and developing assessment tools for use in the ED.
BACKGROUND: Safer opioid prescribing remains a crucial issue for emergency physicians. Policy statements and guidelines recommend deliberate risk assessment for likelihood of current or future opioid use disorder prior to prescribing opioids. However, the practice patterns of emergency physicians remain underreported. METHODS: We surveyed emergency physicians across Canada about their local opioid prescribing policies, their practice patterns of risk assessment prior to prescribing opioids, and which clinical risk factors they find most important. RESULTS: The response rate was 20.4% (n = 312/1532). 59.8% of respondents report usually or always assessing for risk. Physicians rely on gestalt (80.3%), targeted histories based on risk factors in the literature (55.6%) or their experience (57.6%), and reviewing medical (83.1%) and medication records (75.6%). Contacting primary prescribers is uncommon (16.3%). A minority routinely use opioid prescribing risk assessment tools (6.4%), have local opioid prescribing policies (27%), or make use of electronic medical record functions to assist risk stratifying (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Many Canadian emergency physicians make risk assessments based on gestalt rather than identifying literature-based risk factors. This conflicts with guidelines calling for routine comprehensive assessment. Further efforts should be directed towards education in optimizing risk assessment; and towards system-level initiatives such as clear local prescribing policies, electronic-systems functionality, and developing assessment tools for use in the ED.
Authors: Shawn M Varney; Crystal A Perez; Allyson A Araña; Katherine R Carey; Victoria J Ganem; Lee A Zarzabal; Rosemarie G Ramos; Vikhyat S Bebarta Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 3.397