Literature DB >> 33523300

From forest to fragment: compositional differences inside coastal forest moth assemblages and their environmental correlates.

Britta Uhl1, Mirko Wölfling2, Konrad Fiedler2.   

Abstract

Patterns of β-diversity can provide insight into forces shaping community assembly. We analyzed species-rich insect assemblages in two reserve fragments that had once been part of one contiguous Mediterranean coastal pine forest. Local environments are still similar across both fragments, but their landscape context differs strongly, with one surrounded by intense agricultural land, while the other neighbors the urbanized area of Ravenna. Using 23,870 light-trap records of 392 moth species, and multiple local and landscape metrics, we compared the relative importance of habitat- versus landscape-scale environmental factors for shaping small-scale variation in differentiation and proportional insect β-diversity across 30 sites per reserve. Moth assemblage composition differed substantially between fragments, most likely due to ecological drift and landscape-scale variation. For proportional β-diversity, especially local forest structure was important. At well-developed forest sites, additive homogenization could be observed, whereas the lack of typical forest species at dry, dense, and younger forest sites increased species turnover (subtractive heterogenization). For differentiation β-diversity, local and landscape-scale factors were equally important in both reserves. At the landscape-scale (500 m radius around light-trapping sites) the proximity to urban areas and the fraction of human-altered land were most important. At the habitat scale, gradients in soil humidity, nutrient levels and forest structure mattered most, whereas plant diversity had very little explanatory power. Overall, landscape-scale anthropogenic alterations had major effects on moth communities inside the two conservation areas. Yet, even for these parts of one formerly contiguous forest trajectories in community change were remarkably idiosyncratic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservation areas; Land use; Mediterranean insects; Species turnover; β-Diversity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33523300      PMCID: PMC7882585          DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04861-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  28 in total

1.  Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist.

Authors:  Marti J Anderson; Thomas O Crist; Jonathan M Chase; Mark Vellend; Brian D Inouye; Amy L Freestone; Nathan J Sanders; Howard V Cornell; Liza S Comita; Kendi F Davies; Susan P Harrison; Nathan J B Kraft; James C Stegen; Nathan G Swenson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity.

Authors:  Marti J Anderson; Kari E Ellingsen; Brian H McArdle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Ecological drift and the distribution of species diversity.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilbert; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Diversity partitioning confirms the importance of beta components in tropical rainforest Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Jan Beck; Jeremy D Holloway; Chey Vun Khen; Ian J Kitching
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss.

Authors:  Maria Dornelas; Nicholas J Gotelli; Brian McGill; Hideyasu Shimadzu; Faye Moyes; Caya Sievers; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seed-treated crops, and implications for non-target insects.

Authors:  Cristina Botías; Arthur David; Elizabeth M Hill; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition.

Authors:  Eric Allan; Pete Manning; Fabian Alt; Julia Binkenstein; Stefan Blaser; Nico Blüthgen; Stefan Böhm; Fabrice Grassein; Norbert Hölzel; Valentin H Klaus; Till Kleinebecker; E Kathryn Morris; Yvonne Oelmann; Daniel Prati; Swen C Renner; Matthias C Rillig; Martin Schaefer; Michael Schloter; Barbara Schmitt; Ingo Schöning; Marion Schrumpf; Emily Solly; Elisabeth Sorkau; Juliane Steckel; Ingolf Steffen-Dewenter; Barbara Stempfhuber; Marco Tschapka; Christiane N Weiner; Wolfgang W Weisser; Michael Werner; Catrin Westphal; Wolfgang Wilcke; Markus Fischer
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization.

Authors:  Sagrario Gámez-Virués; David J Perović; Martin M Gossner; Carmen Börschig; Nico Blüthgen; Heike de Jong; Nadja K Simons; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Jochen Krauss; Gwen Maier; Christoph Scherber; Juliane Steckel; Christoph Rothenwöhrer; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Christiane N Weiner; Wolfgang Weisser; Michael Werner; Teja Tscharntke; Catrin Westphal
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures.

Authors:  Elia Guariento; Patrick Strutzenberger; Christine Truxa; Konrad Fiedler
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Climatic and vegetational drivers of insect beta diversity at the continental scale.

Authors:  Douglas Chesters; Philip Beckschäfer; Michael C Orr; Sarah J Adamowicz; Kwok-Pan Chun; Chao-Dong Zhu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.