Constantina A Treaba1,2, Elena Herranz1,2, Valeria T Barletta1,2, Ambica Mehndiratta1, Russell Ouellette1, Jacob A Sloane3, Eric C Klawiter4, Revere P Kinkel5, Caterina Mainero6,7. 1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 6. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. cmainero@mgh.harvard.edu. 7. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. cmainero@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate at 7.0-T MRI a) the role of multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions in cortical tissue loss b) their relation to neurological disability. METHODS: In 76 relapsing remitting and 26 secondary progressive MS patients (N = 102) and 56 healthy subjects 7.0-T T2*-weighted images were acquired for lesion segmentation; 3.0-T T1-weighted structural scans for cortical surface reconstruction/cortical thickness estimation. Patients were dichotomized based on the median cortical lesion volume in low and high cortical lesion load groups that differed by age, MS phenotype and degree of neurological disability. Group differences in cortical thickness were tested on reconstructed cortical surface. Patients were evaluated clinically by means of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). RESULTS: Cortical lesions were detected in 96% of patients. White matter lesion load was greater in the high than in the low cortical lesion load MS group (p = 0.01). Both MS groups disclosed clusters (prevalently parietal) of cortical thinning relative to healthy subjects, though these regions did not show the highest cortical lesion density, which predominantly involved frontal regions. Cortical thickness decreased on average by 0.37 mm, (p = 0.002) in MS patients for each unit standard deviation change in white matter lesion volume. The odds of having a higher EDSS were associated with cortical lesion volume (1.78, p = 0.01) and disease duration (1.15, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cortical thinning in MS is not directly related to cortical lesion load but rather with white matter lesion volume. Neurological disability in MS is better explained by cortical lesion volume assessment.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate at 7.0-T MRI a) the role of multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions in cortical tissue loss b) their relation to neurological disability. METHODS: In 76 relapsing remitting and 26 secondary progressive MS patients (N = 102) and 56 healthy subjects 7.0-T T2*-weighted images were acquired for lesion segmentation; 3.0-T T1-weighted structural scans for cortical surface reconstruction/cortical thickness estimation. Patients were dichotomized based on the median cortical lesion volume in low and high cortical lesion load groups that differed by age, MS phenotype and degree of neurological disability. Group differences in cortical thickness were tested on reconstructed cortical surface. Patients were evaluated clinically by means of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). RESULTS: Cortical lesions were detected in 96% of patients. White matter lesion load was greater in the high than in the low cortical lesion load MS group (p = 0.01). Both MS groups disclosed clusters (prevalently parietal) of cortical thinning relative to healthy subjects, though these regions did not show the highest cortical lesion density, which predominantly involved frontal regions. Cortical thickness decreased on average by 0.37 mm, (p = 0.002) in MS patients for each unit standard deviation change in white matter lesion volume. The odds of having a higher EDSS were associated with cortical lesion volume (1.78, p = 0.01) and disease duration (1.15, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cortical thinning in MS is not directly related to cortical lesion load but rather with white matter lesion volume. Neurological disability in MS is better explained by cortical lesion volume assessment.
Authors: Maria Pia Sormani; Laura Bonzano; Luca Roccatagliata; Gary R Cutter; Gian Luigi Mancardi; Paolo Bruzzi Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Christopher P Gilmore; Gabriele C DeLuca; Lars Bö; Trudy Owens; James Lowe; Margaret M Esiri; Nikos Evangelou Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2008-12-19 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Maria A Rocca; Marco Battaglini; Ralph H B Benedict; Nicola De Stefano; Jeroen J G Geurts; Roland G Henry; Mark A Horsfield; Mark Jenkinson; Elisabetta Pagani; Massimo Filippi Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alexandra Kutzelnigg; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Christine Stadelmann; Wolfgang Brück; Helmut Rauschka; Markus Bergmann; Manfred Schmidbauer; Joseph E Parisi; Hans Lassmann Journal: Brain Date: 2005-10-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Erin S Beck; Josefina Maranzano; Nicholas J Luciano; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Stefano Filippini; Mark Morrison; Daniel J Suto; Tianxia Wu; Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; Samson Antel; Dumitru Fetco; Joan Ohayon; Frances Andrada; Yair Mina; Chevaz Thomas; Steve Jacobson; Jeff Duyn; Irene Cortese; Sridar Narayanan; Govind Nair; Pascal Sati; Daniel S Reich Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 5.855