Literature DB >> 33523136

Quantifying CRISPR off-target effects.

Soragia Athina Gkazi1.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the era of genetic engineering have significantly improved our ability to make precise changes in the genomes of human cells. Throughout the years, clinical trials based on gene therapies have led to the cure of diseases such as X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1), adenosine deaminase deficiency (ADA-SCID) and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Despite the success gene therapy has had, there is still the risk of genotoxicity due to the potential oncogenesis introduced by utilising viral vectors. Research has focused on alternative strategies like genome editing without viral vectors as a means to reduce genotoxicity introduced by the viral vectors. Although there is an extensive use of RNA-guided genome editing via the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and associated protein-9 (Cas9) technology for biomedical research, its genome-wide target specificity and its genotoxic side effects remain controversial. There have been reports of on- and off-target effects created by CRISPR-Cas9 that can include small and large indels and inversions, highlighting the potential risk of insertional mutagenesis. In the last few years, a plethora of in silico, in vitro and in vivo genome-wide assays have been introduced with the sole purpose of profiling these effects. Here, we are going to discuss the genotoxic obstacles in gene therapies and give an up-to-date overview of methodologies for quantifying CRISPR-Cas9 effects.
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and the Royal Society of Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; bioinformatics; off-target effects; on-target effects

Year:  2019        PMID: 33523136     DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20180146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci        ISSN: 2397-8554


  4 in total

1.  Multicellular Systems to Translate Somatic Cell Genome Editors to Humans.

Authors:  Victor Hernandez-Gordillo; Thomas Caleb Casolaro; Mo R Ebrahimkhani; Samira Kiani
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-10

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9 revitalizes adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sasan Ghaffari; Nastaran Khalili; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 3.  Current Status of CRISPR/Cas9 Application in Clinical Cancer Research: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Saeed Rafii; Emad Tashkandi; Nedal Bukhari; Humaid O Al-Shamsi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Simple and reliable detection of CRISPR-induced on-target effects by qgPCR and SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Isabel Weisheit; Joseph A Kroeger; Rainer Malik; Benedikt Wefers; Peter Lichtner; Wolfgang Wurst; Martin Dichgans; Dominik Paquet
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 13.491

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.