Literature DB >> 33522793

Comparison of Cellular Morphological Descriptors and Molecular Fingerprints for the Prediction of Cytotoxicity- and Proliferation-Related Assays.

Srijit Seal1, Hongbin Yang1, Luis Vollmers1, Andreas Bender1.   

Abstract

Cell morphology features, such as those from the Cell Painting assay, can be generated at relatively low costs and represent versatile biological descriptors of a system and thereby compound response. In this study, we explored cell morphology descriptors and molecular fingerprints, separately and in combination, for the prediction of cytotoxicity- and proliferation-related in vitro assay endpoints. We selected 135 compounds from the MoleculeNet ToxCast benchmark data set which were annotated with Cell Painting readouts, where the relatively small size of the data set is due to the overlap of required annotations. We trained Random Forest classification models using nested cross-validation and Cell Painting descriptors, Morgan and ErG fingerprints, and their combinations. While using leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation (with clusters based on physicochemical descriptors), models using Cell Painting descriptors achieved higher average performance over all assays (Balanced Accuracy of 0.65, Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.28, and AUC-ROC of 0.71) compared to models using ErG fingerprints (BA 0.55, MCC 0.09, and AUC-ROC 0.60) and Morgan fingerprints alone (BA 0.54, MCC 0.06, and AUC-ROC 0.56). While using random shuffle splits, the combination of Cell Painting descriptors with ErG and Morgan fingerprints further improved balanced accuracy on average by 8.9% (in 9 out of 12 assays) and 23.4% (in 8 out of 12 assays) compared to using only ErG and Morgan fingerprints, respectively. Regarding feature importance, Cell Painting descriptors related to nuclei texture, granularity of cells, and cytoplasm as well as cell neighbors and radial distributions were identified to be most contributing, which is plausible given the endpoint considered. We conclude that cell morphological descriptors contain complementary information to molecular fingerprints which can be used to improve the performance of predictive cytotoxicity models, in particular in areas of novel structural space.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33522793     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  4 in total

1.  Cell Morphological Profiling Enables High-Throughput Screening for PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Phenotypic Signature.

Authors:  Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Elizabeth Mouchet; Guy Williams; Tiziana Monteverde; Karolina Juhani; Riku Turkki; Filip Miljković; Anton Martinsson; Lewis Mervin; Kenneth R Pryde; Erik Müllers; Ian Barrett; Ola Engkvist; Andreas Bender; Kevin Moreau
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Computational analyses of mechanism of action (MoA): data, methods and integration.

Authors:  Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Layla Hosseini-Gerami; Andreas Bender
Journal:  RSC Chem Biol       Date:  2021-12-22

3.  Integrating cell morphology with gene expression and chemical structure to aid mitochondrial toxicity detection.

Authors:  Srijit Seal; Jordi Carreras-Puigvert; Maria-Anna Trapotsi; Hongbin Yang; Ola Spjuth; Andreas Bender
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  A phenomics approach for antiviral drug discovery.

Authors:  Jonne Rietdijk; Marianna Tampere; Aleksandra Pettke; Polina Georgiev; Maris Lapins; Ulrika Warpman-Berglund; Ola Spjuth; Marjo-Riitta Puumalainen; Jordi Carreras-Puigvert
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.431

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.