Marie-Pierre Cyr1,2, Chantale Dumoulin3,4, Paul Bessette2,5, Annick Pina6,7, Walter H Gotlieb8,9, Korine Lapointe-Milot2,5, Mélanie Morin1,2. 1. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 2. Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 3. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4. Research Center of the Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 7. Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 9. Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: More than one-half of gynecological cancer survivors are affected by pain during sexual intercourse, also known as dyspareunia. Oncological treatments may result in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) alterations, which are suspected to play a key role in dyspareunia. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated PFM function and morphometry in this population. The aim of the study was to characterize and compare PFM function and morphometry between gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia and asymptomatic women. METHODS: Twenty-four gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia and 32 women with a history of total hysterectomy but without pelvic pain (asymptomatic women) participated in this comparative cross-sectional study. PFM passive forces (tone), flexibility, stiffness, maximal strength, coordination, and endurance were assessed with an intra-vaginal dynamometric speculum. Bladder neck position, levator plate angle, anorectal angle, and levator hiatal dimensions were measured at rest and on maximal contraction with 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: Compared with asymptomatic women, gynecological cancer survivors showed heightened PFM tone, lower flexibility, higher stiffness, and lower coordination and endurance. At rest, they had a smaller anorectal angle and smaller levator hiatal dimensions, indicating heightened PFM tone. They also presented fewer changes from rest to maximal contraction for anorectal angle and levator hiatal dimensions, suggesting an elevated tone or altered contractile properties. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia present with altered PFM function and morphometry. This research therefore provides a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of dyspareunia in cancer survivors. IMPACT: Our study confirms alterations in PFM function and morphometry in gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia. These findings support the rationale for developing and assessing the efficacy of physical therapy targeting PFM alterations in this population.
OBJECTIVE: More than one-half of gynecological cancer survivors are affected by pain during sexual intercourse, also known as dyspareunia. Oncological treatments may result in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) alterations, which are suspected to play a key role in dyspareunia. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated PFM function and morphometry in this population. The aim of the study was to characterize and compare PFM function and morphometry between gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia and asymptomatic women. METHODS: Twenty-four gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia and 32 women with a history of total hysterectomy but without pelvic pain (asymptomatic women) participated in this comparative cross-sectional study. PFM passive forces (tone), flexibility, stiffness, maximal strength, coordination, and endurance were assessed with an intra-vaginal dynamometric speculum. Bladder neck position, levator plate angle, anorectal angle, and levator hiatal dimensions were measured at rest and on maximal contraction with 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging. RESULTS: Compared with asymptomatic women, gynecological cancer survivors showed heightened PFM tone, lower flexibility, higher stiffness, and lower coordination and endurance. At rest, they had a smaller anorectal angle and smaller levator hiatal dimensions, indicating heightened PFM tone. They also presented fewer changes from rest to maximal contraction for anorectal angle and levator hiatal dimensions, suggesting an elevated tone or altered contractile properties. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia present with altered PFM function and morphometry. This research therefore provides a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of dyspareunia in cancer survivors. IMPACT: Our study confirms alterations in PFM function and morphometry in gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia. These findings support the rationale for developing and assessing the efficacy of physical therapy targeting PFM alterations in this population.