Yan-Feng Zhou1, Xing-Yue Song1, Xiong-Fei Pan1,2, Lei Feng3, Nan Luo4, Jian-Min Yuan5,6, An Pan1, Woon-Puay Koh4,7. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubation), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. 2. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 3. Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 4. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 5. UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 7. Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the relations of individual lifestyle factors and its composite score with healthy ageing among Chinese adults. METHOD: We included 14 159 participants aged 45-74 years at baseline from the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a population-based prospective cohort. A protective lifestyle score (0-5 scale) was calculated at baseline (1993-1998) and updated at the second follow-up visit (2006-2010) on the basis of optimal body mass index (18.5-22.9 kg/m2), healthy diet (upper 40% of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index score), being physically active (≥2 h/wk of moderate activity or ≥0.5 h/wk of strenuous activity), nonsmoking (never smoking), and low-to-moderate alcohol drinking (>0 to ≤14 drinks/wk for men and >0 to ≤7 drinks/wk for women). Healthy ageing was assessed at the third follow-up visit (2014-2016) and was defined as absence of specific chronic diseases, absence of cognitive impairment and limitations in instrumental activities of daily living, good mental and overall self-perceived health, good physical functioning, and no function-limiting pain. RESULTS: About 20.0% (2834) of the participants met the criteria of healthy ageing after a median follow-up of 20 years. Each 1-point increase in the protective lifestyle score computed at baseline and second follow-up visits was associated with higher likelihood of healthy ageing by 25% (95% CI: 20%-30%) and 24% (18%-29%), respectively. The population-attributable risk percent of adherence to 4-5 protective lifestyle factors was 34.3% (95% CI: 25.3%-42.3%) at baseline and 31.3% (23.0%-38.7%) at second follow-up visits for healthy ageing. In addition, positive increase in lifestyle scores from baseline to second follow-up visits was also significantly associated with a higher likelihood of healthy ageing with an odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.12%-1.24%) for each increment in protective lifestyle score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed that adopting healthy lifestyle factors, even after midlife, was associated with healthy ageing at old age.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the relations of individual lifestyle factors and its composite score with healthy ageing among Chinese adults. METHOD: We included 14 159 participants aged 45-74 years at baseline from the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a population-based prospective cohort. A protective lifestyle score (0-5 scale) was calculated at baseline (1993-1998) and updated at the second follow-up visit (2006-2010) on the basis of optimal body mass index (18.5-22.9 kg/m2), healthy diet (upper 40% of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index score), being physically active (≥2 h/wk of moderate activity or ≥0.5 h/wk of strenuous activity), nonsmoking (never smoking), and low-to-moderate alcohol drinking (>0 to ≤14 drinks/wk for men and >0 to ≤7 drinks/wk for women). Healthy ageing was assessed at the third follow-up visit (2014-2016) and was defined as absence of specific chronic diseases, absence of cognitive impairment and limitations in instrumental activities of daily living, good mental and overall self-perceived health, good physical functioning, and no function-limiting pain. RESULTS: About 20.0% (2834) of the participants met the criteria of healthy ageing after a median follow-up of 20 years. Each 1-point increase in the protective lifestyle score computed at baseline and second follow-up visits was associated with higher likelihood of healthy ageing by 25% (95% CI: 20%-30%) and 24% (18%-29%), respectively. The population-attributable risk percent of adherence to 4-5 protective lifestyle factors was 34.3% (95% CI: 25.3%-42.3%) at baseline and 31.3% (23.0%-38.7%) at second follow-up visits for healthy ageing. In addition, positive increase in lifestyle scores from baseline to second follow-up visits was also significantly associated with a higher likelihood of healthy ageing with an odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 1.12%-1.24%) for each increment in protective lifestyle score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed that adopting healthy lifestyle factors, even after midlife, was associated with healthy ageing at old age.
Authors: Sylvia H Ley; An Pan; Yanping Li; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Qi Sun; Frank B Hu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Cécilia Samieri; Qi Sun; Mary K Townsend; Stephanie E Chiuve; Olivia I Okereke; Walter C Willett; Meir Stampfer; Francine Grodstein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 25.391