Yaqing Gao1, Yinping Wang1, Siyu Zou1, Xiaoyi Mi1, Ashish Kc2, Hong Zhou3. 1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health/National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. 2. International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health/National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. hongzhou@bjmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We assessed the associations of iron supplementation and deworming separately or combined with improved early childhood development (ECD) status. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were analyzed for 29,729 children aged 36-59 months surveyed using the Demographic and Health Surveys in ten low- and middle-income countries, where iron supplementation and deworming are recommended by the World Health Organization. In each country, we estimated linear regression models for the effects of iron supplementation and deworming individually or combined on the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) z score, and whether this association differed between various ECD domains and the sex and residence of the child. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Compared with receiving neither of the two interventions, iron supplementation plus deworming was associated with an increased ECDI z score (β = 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.22, p = 0.009), particularly in rural residences. However, iron supplementation and deworming, individually, were not associated with the ECDI z score. Iron supplementation plus deworming was associated with higher odds of on-track development in literacy-numeracy (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.24-2.01, p < 0.001) and learning domains (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.48, p = 0.003), but not with development in the social-emotional and physical domains. CONCLUSION: Iron supplementation plus deworming, particularly for populations who are more susceptible to iron deficiency and intestinal worm infections, could be an important intervention for improving ECD. These findings may inform the argument for the necessity of implementing iron supplementation and deworming for preschool-age children.
PURPOSE: We assessed the associations of iron supplementation and deworming separately or combined with improved early childhood development (ECD) status. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were analyzed for 29,729 children aged 36-59 months surveyed using the Demographic and Health Surveys in ten low- and middle-income countries, where iron supplementation and deworming are recommended by the World Health Organization. In each country, we estimated linear regression models for the effects of iron supplementation and deworming individually or combined on the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) z score, and whether this association differed between various ECD domains and the sex and residence of the child. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Compared with receiving neither of the two interventions, iron supplementation plus deworming was associated with an increased ECDI z score (β = 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.22, p = 0.009), particularly in rural residences. However, iron supplementation and deworming, individually, were not associated with the ECDI z score. Iron supplementation plus deworming was associated with higher odds of on-track development in literacy-numeracy (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.24-2.01, p < 0.001) and learning domains (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.48, p = 0.003), but not with development in the social-emotional and physical domains. CONCLUSION:Iron supplementation plus deworming, particularly for populations who are more susceptible to irondeficiency and intestinal worm infections, could be an important intervention for improving ECD. These findings may inform the argument for the necessity of implementing iron supplementation and deworming for preschool-age children.
Authors: Emily H Siegel; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; Patricia K Kariger; Joanne Katz; Subarna K Khatry; Steven C LeClerq; Ernesto Pollitt; James M Tielsch Journal: J Nutr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Constance A Gewa; Robert E Weiss; Nimrod O Bwibo; Shannon Whaley; Marian Sigman; Suzanne P Murphy; Gail Harrison; Charlotte G Neumann Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Shannon E Whaley; Marian Sigman; Charlotte Neumann; Nimrod Bwibo; Donald Guthrie; Robert E Weiss; Susan Alber; Suzanne P Murphy Journal: J Nutr Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Judie L Hulett; Robert E Weiss; Nimrod O Bwibo; Osman M Galal; Natalie Drorbaugh; Charlotte G Neumann Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Bernadette Daelmans; Gary L Darmstadt; Joan Lombardi; Maureen M Black; Pia R Britto; Stephen Lye; Tarun Dua; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Linda M Richter Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dana Charles McCoy; Evan D Peet; Majid Ezzati; Goodarz Danaei; Maureen M Black; Christopher R Sudfeld; Wafaie Fawzi; Günther Fink Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Louise Capling; Ryan Tam; Kathryn L Beck; Gary J Slater; Victoria M Flood; Helen T O'Connor; Janelle A Gifford Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 5.717