| Literature DB >> 33521246 |
Anastasios Mavrakis1, Athanasia Kapsali2, Ioannis X Tsiros3, Katerina Pantavou3.
Abstract
Heatwaves-excessively hot ambient conditions that are considered a serious threat to human health-are often associated with poor air quality. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of an early heatwave episode in an industrialized plain in the eastern Mediterranean region (Thriasio, Greece) on human thermal discomfort and urban air quality. The heatwave occurred in mid (15-20) May 2020, shortly after some of the restrictions that were improsed to halt the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Greece were lifted (on 4 May). The discomfort index (DI) and the daily air quality index (DAQI) were calculated on an hourly basis throughout spring 2020 (March, April, May) using data from two stations that measure meteorological parameters and air pollutant concentrations in the Thriasio Plain. The analysis showed that the air temperature increased during 7-17 May to levels that were more than 10 °C above the monthly average value (25.8 °C). The maximum measured air temperature was 38 °C (on 17 May). The results showed a high level of thermal discomfort. The DI exceeded the threshold of 24 °C for several hours during 13-20 May. Increased air pollution levels were also identified. The average DAQI was estimated as 0.83 ± 0.1 and 1.14 ± 0.2 at two monitoring stations in the region of interest during the heatwave. Particulate matter (diameter < 10 μm) appeared to contribute significantly to the poor air quality. Significant correlations between the air temperature, DI, and AQSI were also identified. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Air quality index; Heatwave; Thermal discomfort
Year: 2021 PMID: 33521246 PMCID: PMC7829091 DOI: 10.1007/s41207-020-00237-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EuroMediterr J Environ Integr ISSN: 2365-7448
Fig. 1Map of Attica Prefecture
Assessment scale for the discomfort index (DI; Giles et al. 1990) and the daily air quality index (DAQI; Katsoulis and Kassomenos 2004)
| DI (°C) | Thermal conditions | DAQI | Air quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18–21 | No discomfort | < 0.2 | Very low |
| 21–24 | < 50% of the population feels discomfort | 0.2–0.4 | Low |
| 24–26 | > 50% of the population feels discomfort | 0.4–0.6 | Moderate |
| 27–29 | Most of the population suffers discomfort | 0.6–0.8 | Distinct |
| 29–32 | Everyone feels severe stress | > 0.8 | Strong |
| Over 32 | State of medical emergency | Independent of DAQI | Extreme |
Descriptive statistics for parameters of interest
| March 2020 | April 2020 | May 2020 | March–May 2020 | Lockdown 2020 | Heatwave May 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Stdev | Max | Min | Average | Stdev | Max | Min | Average | Stdev | Max | Min | Average | Stdev | Max | Min | Average | Stdev | Max | Min | Average | Stdev | Max | Min | ||
| LGEL | 13.1 | 3.9 | 24.0 | 3.0 | 15.0 | 4.5 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 21.4 | 5.3 | 38.0 | 12.0 | 16.5 | 5.8 | 38.0 | 3.0 | 14.9 | 4.6 | 27.0 | 5.0 | 27.1 | 5.1 | 38.0 | 18.0 | |
| RH (%) | 67 | 17 | 100 | 26 | 58 | 17 | 100 | 20 | 50 | 16 | 94 | 14 | 58 | 18 | 100 | 14 | 60 | 18 | 100 | 20 | 43 | 15 | 83 | 14 | |
| DI (°C) | 13.1 | 3.2 | 20.6 | 4.2 | 14.6 | 3.3 | 22.2 | 7.3 | 19.1 | 3.3 | 27.1 | 12.1 | 15.6 | 4.1 | 27.1 | 4.2 | 14.5 | 3.4 | 22.2 | 6.3 | 22.8 | 2.6 | 27.1 | 17.2 | |
| AL | 13.9 | 3.6 | 24.6 | 5.6 | 15.7 | 4.1 | 25.0 | 8.1 | 21.8 | 4.6 | 36.1 | 12.8 | 17.0 | 5.3 | 36.1 | 5.6 | 15.6 | 4.1 | 26.2 | 8.1 | 27.2 | 3.8 | 36.1 | 20.4 | |
| RH (%) | 64 | 19 | 100 | 25 | 55 | 19 | 100 | 18 | 48 | 15 | 100 | 14 | 56 | 19 | 100 | 14 | 59 | 20 | 100 | 18 | 43 | 13 | 88 | 15 | |
| DI (°C) | 13.9 | 2.8 | 20.5 | 7.3 | 15.2 | 2.9 | 21.1 | 8.6 | 19.5 | 2.9 | 26.3 | 12.8 | 16.1 | 3.7 | 26.3 | 7.3 | 15.1 | 3.0 | 21.7 | 8.4 | 23.0 | 2.0 | 26.3 | 18.8 | |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 12 | 9 | 59 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 110 | 0 | 14 | 16 | 123 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 123 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 110 | 0 | 29 | 26 | 123 | 0 | |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 44 | 23 | 145 | 7 | 37 | 24 | 144 | 5 | 49 | 29 | 160 | 8 | 43 | 25 | 160 | 5 | 36 | 23 | 144 | 5 | 72 | 31 | 160 | 22 | |
| O3 (μg/m3) | 41 | 26 | 130 | 0 | 62 | 28 | 125 | 1 | 60 | 35 | 220 | 1 | 54 | 31 | 220 | 0 | 58 | 29 | 125 | 1 | 60 | 52 | 220 | 1 | |
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 41 | 27 | 209 | 4 | 35 | 22 | 156 | 1 | 47 | 37 | 295 | 3 | 41 | 29 | 295 | 1 | 35 | 22 | 156 | 1 | 90 | 41 | 295 | 4 | |
| DAQI | 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.19 | 0.54 | 0.32 | 0.94 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.21 | 0.94 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.10 | 0.94 | 0.71 | |
| ELE | NO2 (μg/m3) | 65 | 52 | 207 | 1 | 86 | 69 | 345 | 2 | 77 | 63 | 345 | 1 | 57 | 33 | 118 | 5 | 133 | 75 | 345 | 6 | ||||
| O3 (μg/m3) | 9 | 7 | 35 | 3 | 49 | 25 | 126 | 3 | 57 | 28 | 156 | 5 | 45 | 29 | 156 | 3 | 40 | 23 | 79 | 5 | 52 | 39 | 156 | 5 | |
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 27 | 19 | 85 | 2 | 26 | 16 | 107 | 1 | 43 | 35 | 493 | 7 | 31 | 25 | 493 | 1 | 25 | 13 | 55 | 4 | 72 | 44 | 493 | 24 | |
| DAQI | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 1.11 | 0.20 | 0.82 | 0.29 | 1.39 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 1.39 | 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 1.11 | 0.12 | 1.14 | 0.19 | 1.39 | 0.91 | |
Hourly data were calculated and then used to derive daily averages
AL Alonistra, ELE Elefsis City, LGEL Elefsis Air Base, Max maximum, Min minimum, Stdev standard deviation, T air temperature, RH relative humidity, SO sulfur dioxide, NO nitrogen dioxide, O ozone, PM particulate matter less than 10 μm in diameter
Fig. 2Variation in a the maximum daily air temperature and b the maximum discomfort index (DI) and daily air quality index (DAQI) values
Fig. 3Variation in the daily maximum concentrations of air pollutants at a Alonistra station (AL) and b Elefsis station (ELE)
Pearson correlation coefficients for the associations between air temperature (Ta), relative humidity (RH), air pollutant concentrations (SO2, NO2, O3, PM10), discomfort index (DI), and daily air quality index (DAQI)
| Station | LGEL | AL | ELE | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ta | RH | DI | Ta | RH | DI | SO2 | NO2 | O3 | PM10 | DAQI | NO2 | O3 | PM10 | DAQI | ||
| LGEL | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| RH | − 0.58 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| DI | − 0.57 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| AL | − 0.59 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| RH | − 0.50 | − 0.50 | − 0.49 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| DI | − 0.57 | − 0.49 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| SO2 | 0.45 | − 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.45 | − 0.23 | 0.43 | 1 | |||||||||
| NO2 | 0.45 | − 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.45 | − 0.13 | 0.43 | 1 | |||||||||
| O3 | 0.27 | − 0.57 | 0.28 | 0.29 | − 0.45 | 0.29 | − 0.19 | − 0.53 | 1 | |||||||
| PM10 | − 0.10 | 0.54 | − 0.14 | − 0.17 | 1 | |||||||||||
| DAQI | − 0.15 | − 0.18 | − 0.12 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| ELE | NO2 | − 0.22 | − 0.18 | − 0.43 | 1 | |||||||||||
| O3 | 0.44 | − 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.45 | − 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.02 | − 0.11 | − 0.03 | 0.01 | − 0.68 | 1 | ||||
| PM10 | − 0.29 | − 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 1 | ||||||||||
| DAQI | − 0.46 | − 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 1 | |||||||||||
Statistically significant coefficients are shown in bold
AL Alonistra, ELE Elefsis City, LGEL Elefsis Air Base, T air temperature, RH relative humidity, SO sulfur dioxide, NO nitrogen dioxide, O ozone, PM particulate matter less than 10 μm in diameter
Fig. 4Back trajectories of air masses for the period 15–20 May 2020 at 12 UTC. The trajectories were calculated using the FLEXTRA model and meteorological data were provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)