Literature DB >> 33520804

Insulin injection practices among youngsters with diabetes in Tikur Anbesa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

Afewerki Gebremeskel Tsadik1, Meles Tekie Gidey2, Brhane Teklebrhan Assefa3, Haftom Niguse Abraha1, Tesfaye Dessale Kassa1, Tesfay Mehari Atey1, Mamo Feyissa4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main aim of this study was to explore how participants were practicing insulin injections and assess its association with the insulin related-outcomes.
METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 176 youngsters with diabetes in Tikur Anbesa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. The inclusion criterion was the use of insulin treatment for a minimum of one year. Data about insulin injection practices was derived from participants' report. Descriptive statistics was presented using frequency distributions and percentages for categorical variables while measure of central tendencies and dispersion for continuous variables. Chi-square test was employed to test for the association between compared variables.
RESULTS: Participants were asked on how frequent they practice the appropriate insulin injecting practices. Based on that, eliminating air bubbles from a syringe, lifting skin fold during an injection, inserting a needle deep enough in the subcutaneous tissue, inspecting injection sites and self-monitoring of blood glucose were frequently done practices in more than 80% of the participants. Besides, over half of the participants reported that they frequently practice; insulin vial inspection, physical exercise, inject 1-3 cm apart from previous site, and insert a needle at 450. Regarding insulin storage, more than half of them store opened insulin in the refrigerator, though it is advisable to store it at room temperature. Appropriate injection site rotation was reported by nearly one-third of the participants. Questions such as; gentle re-suspension of cloudy insulin, adjust insulin dose when necessary and change insulin syringe at every injection were reported by very few of the participants. Coming to glycemic control of our study subjects, 83% of them had HgbA1C of above 7.5% (non-optimal) and 31% reported at least one episode of hypoglycemia. Non-optimal glycemic control was explained by poor injection site hygiene (p < 0.038) and infrequent inspection of injection sites (p < 0.049).
CONCLUSION: Compared to previous studies, this study came with higher proportion of participants who frequently practice the appropriate insulin injection practices. However, it is still important to educate patients on some crucial injecting practices. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes mellitus; Glycemic control; Hypoglycemia; Insulin injection techniques

Year:  2020        PMID: 33520804      PMCID: PMC7843670          DOI: 10.1007/s40200-020-00565-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord        ISSN: 2251-6581


  8 in total

1.  Results and analysis of the 2008-2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Carina De Coninck; Anders Frid; Ruth Gaspar; Debbie Hicks; Larry Hirsch; Gillian Kreugel; Jutta Liersch; Corinne Letondeur; Jean-Pierre Sauvanet; Nadia Tubiana; Kenneth Strauss
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.006

2.  Prevalence and risk factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes.

Authors:  M Blanco; M T Hernández; K W Strauss; M Amaya
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 6.041

Review 3.  Worldwide Injection Technique Questionnaire Study: Population Parameters and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Anders H Frid; Laurence J Hirsch; Astrid R Menchior; Didier R Morel; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  A Frid; L Hirsch; R Gaspar; D Hicks; G Kreugel; J Liersch; C Letondeur; J P Sauvanet; N Tubiana-Rufi; K Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.041

5.  Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies.

Authors:  N Sarwar; P Gao; S R Kondapally Seshasai; R Gobin; S Kaptoge; E Di Angelantonio; E Ingelsson; D A Lawlor; E Selvin; M Stampfer; C D A Stehouwer; S Lewington; L Pennells; A Thompson; N Sattar; I R White; K K Ray; J Danesh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 202.731

6.  An Audit of Insulin Usage and Insulin Injection Practices in a Large Indian Cohort.

Authors:  Manash P Baruah; Sanjay Kalra; Saptarshi Bose; Jumi Deka
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 May-Jun

7.  Frequency of Lipohypertrophy and Associated Risk Factors in Young Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Asirvatham A Robert; Rim B Braham; Mohamed A Al Dawish
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Turkish Insulin Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics of Turkish Patients with Diabetes Who Inject Insulin and Details of Their Injection Practices as Assessed by Survey Questionnaire.

Authors:  Selcuk Dagdelen; Oguzhan Deyneli; Nermin Olgun; Zeynep Osar Siva; Mehmet Sargin; Sükrü Hatun; Mustafa Kulaksizoglu; Ahmet Kaya; Cansu Aslan Gürlek; Laurence J Hirsch; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.945

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.