Literature DB >> 33520403

Layperson/Plain Language Summaries: Can Sponsors, CROs, and Sites Deliver in 2020?

Charles S Wilcox1,2,3, Leslie Franceschi1,2,3, Adam Simmons1,2,3.   

Abstract

The much-anticipated 2014 European Union (EU) Clinical Trial Regulation requiring Layperson/ Plain Language Summaries (PLS) is slated for implementation in 2020. At the 10th Annual CNS Summit Conference (Fall 2019), a panel discussion was convened with the objective of evaluating the likelihood of the PLS legislation being implemented successfully in the EU and voluntarily (e.g., pro-actively) in the rest of the world. Points of the discussion embraced the notion that this is an excellent opportunity for the entire pharmaceutical industry. Moreover, in the United States, public opinion of the pharmaceutical industry hit an all-time low in 2019, surpassing the oil industry with regard to public distrust. For decades, clinical trial participants have stated that wanting to learn, in layperson terms, the results of the study was second only to wanting to learn the treatment group into which they were assigned under double-blind conditions. Our conclusion is that while confidentiality, commercial interests, total costs, regulatory concerns, as well as some operational aspects (i.e., patient access portals) are among the hurdles, our commentary strongly advocates systematic implementation not only within the EU, but that this should be implemented globally, without further delay.
Copyright © 2020. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EU CTR No.536/2014; Plain Language Summaries; patient access portals; public distrust

Year:  2020        PMID: 33520403      PMCID: PMC7839658     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 2158-8333


  6 in total

1.  Meeting the obligation to communicate clinical trial results to study volunteers.

Authors:  Kenneth Getz; Zachary Hallinan; Diane Simmons; Marla Jo Brickman; Zhanna Jumadilova; Lynne Pauer; Marc Wilenzick; Briggs Morrison
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.045

2.  Drug risks and free speech--can Congress ban consumer drug ads?

Authors:  Miriam Shuchman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  FDA weighs limits for online ads.

Authors:  Bridget M Kuehn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  CNS sites cooperate to detect duplicate subjects with a clinical trial subject registry.

Authors:  Thomas M Shiovitz; Charles S Wilcox; Lilit Gevorgyan; Adnan Shawkat
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-02

5.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.

Authors:  David B Fogel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-08-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.