Literature DB >> 3352028

Ureteroscopic results and complications: experience with 130 cases.

G F Daniels1, J E Garnett, M F Carter.   

Abstract

Since its introduction for general use, the role of rigid ureteroscopy in the diagnosis and therapy of urological disease has been in evolution. We evaluated retrospectively the experience at our institution with rigid ureteroscopy from January 1983 to July 1986 in an attempt to identify clinical situations or techniques that tended to increase the incidence of either success or complications. We determined that ureteroscopic complications were rare in procedures performed for diagnosis compared to those performed for calculi (2 of 33 or 6 per cent versus 27 of 99 or 27 per cent, p less than 0.025). The likelihood of failure or complication was greater for stones above than for those below the pelvic brim (15 of 25 or 60 per cent versus 26 of 75 or 35 per cent, p less than 0.05). Major complications were more common early in our experience (9 of 63 or 14 per cent versus 2 of 69 or 3 per cent for the combined years 1983 and 1984 compared to 1985 and 1986, p less than 0.05). Our success rates in the treatment of calculous disease were similar to those reported previously, and they were somewhat better for stones located below (62 of 75 or 83 per cent) than for those above (17 of 25 or 68 per cent) the pelvic brim. Based on our findings we conclude that carefully performed diagnostic ureteroscopy has little potential for major complications, ureteroscopy for stones above the pelvic brim should be avoided when possible, and an increased rate of complications and failures is expected early in any series owing at least partly to the learning curve effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3352028     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42607-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  The management of ureteric calculi without extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  G C O'Toole; S M Khan; D G Kelly; D M Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  In situ prone ESWL for the treatment of lower ureteral stones: experience with 28 patients.

Authors:  I Başar; T Gürpinar; A Erkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Fragmentation without extraction in ureteral stones: outcomes of 238 cases.

Authors:  Cemal Göktaş; Rahim Horuz; Oktay Akça; Ali Cihangir Cetinel; Selami Albayrak; Kemal Sarıca
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-10-18

4.  Treatment of ureteral stones using Holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  Y Ilker; A Ozgür; C Yazici
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Comparing the efficacy of tamsulosin and silodosin in the medical expulsion therapy for ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Sandeep Gupta; Bijit Lodh; Akoijam Kaku Singh; Khumukcham Somarendra; Kangjam Sholay Meitei; Sinam Rajendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

6.  The role of ureteroscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in various indications.

Authors:  Y Ilker; O Dillioğlugil; T Tarcan; L Türkeri; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  UV filters in matched seminal fluid-, urine-, and serum samples from young men.

Authors:  Hanne Frederiksen; Marianna Krause; Niels Jørgensen; Anders Rehfeld; Niels E Skakkebæk; Anna-Maria Andersson
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Tepeler; Berkan Resorlu; Tolga Sahin; Selcuk Sarikaya; Mirze Bayindir; Ural Oguz; Abdullah Armagan; Ali Unsal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Development of a nomogram predicting the probability of stone free rate in patients with ureteral stones eligible for semi-rigid primary laser uretero-litothripsy.

Authors:  Cosimo De Nunzio; Jamil Ghahhari; Riccardo Lombardo; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Ana Albano; Antonio Franco; Valeria Baldassarri; Antonio Nacchia; Juan Lopez; Pilar Luque; Maria Jose Ribal; Antonio Alcaraz; Andrea Tubaro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.