Literature DB >> 33520181

Insights into short- and long-term crop-foraging strategies in a chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) from GPS and accelerometer data.

Ben J Walton1, Leah J Findlay1, Russell A Hill1,2,3.   

Abstract

Crop-foraging by animals is a leading cause of human-wildlife "conflict" globally, affecting farmers and resulting in the death of many animals in retaliation, including primates. Despite significant research into crop-foraging by primates, relatively little is understood about the behavior and movements of primates in and around crop fields, largely due to the limitations of traditional observational methods. Crop-foraging by primates in large-scale agriculture has also received little attention. We used GPS and accelerometer bio-loggers, along with environmental data, to gain an understanding of the spatial and temporal patterns of activity for a female in a crop-foraging baboon group in and around commercial farms in South Africa over one year. Crop fields were avoided for most of the year, suggesting that fields are perceived as a high-risk habitat. When field visits did occur, this was generally when plant primary productivity was low, suggesting that crops were a "fallback food". All recorded field visits were at or before 15:00. Activity was significantly higher in crop fields than in the landscape in general, evidence that crop-foraging is an energetically costly strategy and that fields are perceived as a risky habitat. In contrast, activity was significantly lower within 100 m of the field edge than in the rest of the landscape, suggesting that baboons wait near the field edge to assess risks before crop-foraging. Together, this understanding of the spatiotemporal dynamics of crop-foraging can help to inform crop protection strategies and reduce conflict between humans and baboons in South Africa.
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bio‐logging; crop‐raiding; human–wildlife conflict; human–wildlife interactions

Year:  2021        PMID: 33520181      PMCID: PMC7820140          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


  1 in total

1.  Camera traps and guard observations as an alternative to researcher observation for studying anthropogenic foraging.

Authors:  Ben J Walton; Leah J Findlay; Russell A Hill
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.