Literature DB >> 33519969

Field sizes and the future of farmland biodiversity in European landscapes.

Yann Clough1, Stefan Kirchweger2, Jochen Kantelhardt3.   

Abstract

Lower diversity of plant and animal farmland species are usually reported where cropland has been aggregated into larger fields, which raises prospects of curbing declines in European farmland biodiversity and associated ecosystem services by halting trends to field size increases associated to agricultural intensification, without having to set aside arable land for conservation. Here, we consider the factors underlying trade-offs between farmer income and biodiversity as mediated by field size at local and landscape scales, and how these trade-offs may be overcome. Field sizes are still increasing, facilitated by increasing farm sizes and land consolidation. Decreases in working time and fuel expenses when fields are larger, uptake of larger machinery and subsidies favoring larger farms provide incentives to manage land in larger units, putting farmland biodiversity further at risk. Yet, field size-mediated ecological-economic trade-offs are largely ignored in policy and research. We recommend internalizing the ecological effects of changes in landscape-scale field size into land consolidation scheme design, ensuring that EU Common Agricultural Policy post-2020 rewards farmers that maintain and recreate fine-grained landscapes where these are essential for farmland biodiversity targets, and reducing economic-ecological trade-offs by stimulating agricultural research and innovation for economically efficient yet biodiversity-friendly farming in fine-grained landscapes.
© 2020 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agricultural land consolidation; agrienvironmental policy; defragmentation; ecological economics; farmland biodiversity; field edges; land fragmentation; landscape configuration; mechanization; plot size

Year:  2020        PMID: 33519969      PMCID: PMC7816254          DOI: 10.1111/conl.12752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Lett        ISSN: 1755-263X            Impact factor:   8.105


  4 in total

1.  An approach for comparing agricultural development to societal visions.

Authors:  Julian Helfenstein; Vasco Diogo; Matthias Bürgi; Peter H Verburg; Beatrice Schüpbach; Erich Szerencsits; Franziska Mohr; Michael Siegrist; Rebecca Swart; Felix Herzog
Journal:  Agron Sustain Dev       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.832

2.  Smaller farm size and ruminant animals are associated with increased supply of non-provisioning ecosystem services.

Authors:  Johan O Karlsson; Pernilla Tidåker; Elin Röös
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 6.943

3.  Increasing crop field size does not consistently exacerbate insect pest problems.

Authors:  Jay A Rosenheim; Emma Cluff; Mia K Lippey; Bodil N Cass; Daniel Paredes; Soroush Parsa; Daniel S Karp; Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Pest species respond differently to farm field size.

Authors:  George G Kennedy; Anders S Huseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 12.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.