Literature DB >> 33519452

Pros and Cons of Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Secondary Study of Trial Sequential Analysis.

Binghao Zhao1,2, Qian Wu3, Li Wang3, Chen Liao3, Yifei Dong4, Jingsong Xu4, Yiping Wei1, Wenxiong Zhang1.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: Aspirin leads to substantial benefits for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to cast more light on aspirin's role for the primary prevention of CVD.
Methods: Databases were searched for clinical trials comparing aspirin vs. no aspirin use in this meta-analysis. Efficacy and safety profiles were rigorously investigated. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to determine the robustness of the results.
Results: Fourteen studies with 163,840 participants were eligible (mean follow-up 6.2 y). Aspirin intake was found to be associated with 9, 13, and 12% reductions in the risk of cardiovascular events (CV events) (relative risk [RR]: 0.91, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.87-0.96; risk difference (RD): 0.29%; absolute risk percentage (AR%): 7.61%; number needed to treat (NNT): 345), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.97; RD: 0.21%; AR%: 11.11%; NNT: 488) and ischemic stroke (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96; RD: 0.21%; AR%: 16.14%; NNT: 476), respectively; aspirin intake was also associated with 40%, 30%, and 57% increases in the risk of major bleeding (RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.29-1.53; RD: 0.47%; AR%: 27.85; NNT: 214), intracranial bleeding (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.52; RD: 0.10%; AR%: 22.99%; NNT: 1,000) and major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.38-1.78; RD: 0.32%; AR%: 36.70%; NNT: 315), respectively. Further, populations with low doses of aspirin intake (≤100 mg), populations <65 y old or populations with body mass index (BMI) ≧ 25 experienced more advantages; high-risk (10-y cardiovascular risk ≧10%) and full diabetic individuals reported hardly clinical benefits.
Conclusion: Aspirin intake was associated with a reduced risk of CV events and an increased incidence of bleeding profiles in primary prevention. It is necessary to identify individual's CVD risk using clear examinations or assessments before aspirin intake, and truly realize individualized prescription.
Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Wu, Wang, Liao, Dong, Xu, Wei and Zhang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aspirin; cardiovascular disease; primary prevention; secondary study; trial sequential analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33519452      PMCID: PMC7845480          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.592116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.810


  2 in total

1.  Benefits and Risks Associated with Low-Dose Aspirin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Mingming Wang; Haijie Yu; Zuojing Li; Daxin Gong; Xiaoxi Liu
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 2.  Cardiovascular disease in diabetes, beyond glucose.

Authors:  Robert H Eckel; Karin E Bornfeldt; Ira J Goldberg
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 31.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.