Literature DB >> 33519355

Intensity and Dose of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Influence Sensorimotor Cortical Excitability.

Ainhoa Insausti-Delgado1,2,3, Eduardo López-Larraz1,4, Jason Omedes5,6, Ander Ramos-Murguialday1,7.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the nervous system has been extensively used in neurorehabilitation due to its capacity to engage the muscle fibers, improving muscle tone, and the neural pathways, sending afferent volleys toward the brain. Although different neuroimaging tools suggested the capability of NMES to regulate the excitability of sensorimotor cortex and corticospinal circuits, how the intensity and dose of NMES can neuromodulate the brain oscillatory activity measured with electroencephalography (EEG) is still unknown to date. We quantified the effect of NMES parameters on brain oscillatory activity of 12 healthy participants who underwent stimulation of wrist extensors during rest. Three different NMES intensities were included, two below and one above the individual motor threshold, fixing the stimulation frequency to 35 Hz and the pulse width to 300 μs. Firstly, we efficiently removed stimulation artifacts from the EEG recordings. Secondly, we analyzed the effect of amplitude and dose on the sensorimotor oscillatory activity. On the one hand, we observed a significant NMES intensity-dependent modulation of brain activity, demonstrating the direct effect of afferent receptor recruitment. On the other hand, we described a significant NMES intensity-dependent dose-effect on sensorimotor activity modulation over time, with below-motor-threshold intensities causing cortical inhibition and above-motor-threshold intensities causing cortical facilitation. Our results highlight the relevance of intensity and dose of NMES, and show that these parameters can influence the recruitment of the sensorimotor pathways from the muscle to the brain, which should be carefully considered for the design of novel neuromodulation interventions based on NMES.
Copyright © 2021 Insausti-Delgado, López-Larraz, Omedes and Ramos-Murguialday.

Entities:  

Keywords:  afferent cortical activation; artifact removal; electroencephalography (EEG); neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES); sensorimotor oscillatory rhythm

Year:  2021        PMID: 33519355      PMCID: PMC7845652          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.593360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  6 in total

1.  MCU-less biphasic electrical stimulation circuit for miniaturized neuromodulator.

Authors:  Himshekhar Das; Hangue Park
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Volunteers' concerns about facial neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Themis Nikolas Efthimiou; Paul H P Hanel; Sebastian Korb
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-05-07

3.  Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Modulates Cortical Beta-Band Activity.

Authors:  Laura J Arendsen; Robert Guggenberger; Manuela Zimmer; Tobias Weigl; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Neuromuscular or Sensory Electrical Stimulation for Reconditioning Motor Output and Postural Balance in Older Subjects?

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Effect of Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensorimotor Cortical Activity during Upper-Limb Movements in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Ciarán McGeady; Monzurul Alam; Yong-Ping Zheng; Aleksandra Vučković
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Effects of Electromyography Bridge on Upper Limb Motor Functions in Stroke Participants: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Qin Zhao; Gongwei Jia; Lang Jia; Yule Wang; Wei Jiang; Yali Feng; Hang Jiang; Lehua Yu; Jing Yu; Botao Tan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.