Lisa M Quintiliani1, Jessica A Whiteley2, Jessica Zhu3, Emily K Quinn4, Jennifer Murillo3, Ramona Lara3, John Kane5. 1. Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston, MA. 2. University of Massachusetts Boston, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, Boston, MA. 3. Boston Medical Center, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston, MA. 4. Boston University School of Public Health, Biostatics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston, MA. 5. Boston Housing Authority, Department of Operations, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Objectives: Understanding associations between psychosocial and physical factors among those who experience food insecurity could help design effective food insecurity programs for improved cardiovascular health among low-income populations. We examined differences in psychosocial and physical factors between those who were food secure compared with food insecure among public housing residents. Methods: Data were from the baseline survey of a randomized controlled trial of a weight management intervention in Boston, Massachusetts from 2016-2017. Food insecurity and psychosocial and physical factors, including perceived stress, personal problems, social support, and physical symptoms, were measured via interviewer-administered screeners. Results:Mean age of the sample (N=102) was 46.5 years (SD=11.9). The majority were Hispanic (67%), female (88%), with ≤high school degree (62%). Nearly half were food insecure (48%). For psychosocial variables, those who were food insecure had higher ratings of perceived stress (adjusted mean difference 3.39, 95% CI:2.00,4.79), a higher number of personal problems (adjusted mean difference 1.85, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.51), and lower social support (adjusted mean difference -0.70, 95% CI:-1.30,-0.11) compared with those who were food secure. For physical variables, those who were food insecure had higher odds of reporting negative physical symptoms (aOR 4.92, 95% CI:1.84,13.16). Conclusion: Among this sample of public housing residents, food insecurity was associated with higher stress, more personal problems, higher experiences of physical symptoms, and lower social support.
RCT Entities:
Objectives: Understanding associations between psychosocial and physical factors among those who experience food insecurity could help design effective food insecurity programs for improved cardiovascular health among low-income populations. We examined differences in psychosocial and physical factors between those who were food secure compared with food insecure among public housing residents. Methods: Data were from the baseline survey of a randomized controlled trial of a weight management intervention in Boston, Massachusetts from 2016-2017. Food insecurity and psychosocial and physical factors, including perceived stress, personal problems, social support, and physical symptoms, were measured via interviewer-administered screeners. Results: Mean age of the sample (N=102) was 46.5 years (SD=11.9). The majority were Hispanic (67%), female (88%), with ≤high school degree (62%). Nearly half were food insecure (48%). For psychosocial variables, those who were food insecure had higher ratings of perceived stress (adjusted mean difference 3.39, 95% CI:2.00,4.79), a higher number of personal problems (adjusted mean difference 1.85, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.51), and lower social support (adjusted mean difference -0.70, 95% CI:-1.30,-0.11) compared with those who were food secure. For physical variables, those who were food insecure had higher odds of reporting negative physical symptoms (aOR 4.92, 95% CI:1.84,13.16). Conclusion: Among this sample of public housing residents, food insecurity was associated with higher stress, more personal problems, higher experiences of physical symptoms, and lower social support.
Authors: Kelsey A Vercammen; Alyssa J Moran; Amanda C McClain; Anne N Thorndike; Aarohee P Fulay; Eric B Rimm Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Merryn Maynard; Lesley Andrade; Sara Packull-McCormick; Christopher M Perlman; Cesar Leos-Toro; Sharon I Kirkpatrick Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Deborah J Bowen; Lisa M Quintiliani; Sarah Gees Bhosrekar; Rachel Goodman; Eugenia Smith Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 3.295