| Literature DB >> 33518078 |
Amélie Juanchich1, Séverine Urvoix2, Christelle Hennequet-Antier2, Agnès Narcy2, Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau2.
Abstract
Sustainability of poultry farming relies on the development of more efficient and autonomous production systems in terms of feed supply. This implies a better integration of adaptive traits in breeding programs, including digestive efficiency, to favor the use of a wider variety of feedstuffs. The objective of the study was to better characterize the kinetics of development of the digestive tract in broilers, in relationship with digestive efficiency by measuring various digestive parameters as well as serum color. Absolute and relative growth of gastrointestinal tract organs were compared between 2 divergent chicken lines selected on digestive efficiency (AMEn) during 7 wk of development. We show that as early as 7 d of age, these 2 lines differs for several organs developments and that these differences remain visible later on. In addition, the allometry of the gizzard and intestine segments is different between the 2 lines, with efficient birds putting more effort in the upper part of the digestive tract during postnatal development and less-efficient birds putting more effort in the lower part of the gastrointestinal tract. Interestingly, we also showed that differences in serum pigmentation, which is a good biomarker for digestive capacity, could be a convenient diagnostic tool to discriminate between chickens with high or low digestive efficiency at early stages of development. In conclusion, this study showed that selection of chickens for AMEn had large impacts in gastrointestinal development including at early stages and is a valuable resource for further studies on the genetic and physiological control of the response of the animal to feed variations.Entities:
Keywords: broiler; development; digestive efficiency; gastrointestinal tract
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33518078 PMCID: PMC7858159 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Composition of diet.
| Ingredients | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Corn | 4.31 |
| Wheat | 51.40 |
| Rye | 5.00 |
| Soybean Oil | 3.00 |
| Palm Oil | 3.00 |
| Soybean cake 48 | 28.87 |
| Calcium carbonate | 1.14 |
| Bicalcic phosphate | 1.99 |
| Salt | 0.30 |
| Vitamins and mineral | 0.40 |
| DL Methionine | 0.26 |
| HCl lysine | 0.21 |
| Threonine | 0.07 |
| Anticoccidial | 0.05 |
Mean, SD, line effect, and sex effect for traits recorded during the balance trial between 20 and 23 d of age (N = 12 for each line).
| Trait | Age (d) | D+ mean (±SD) | D− mean (±SD) | D+/D− ratio (%) | Line effect | Sex effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW | 20 | 385.7 ± 47.1 | 369.2 ± 47.3 | 4.5 | 0.14 | 0.072 |
| BW | 23 | 486.9 ± 60.7 | 461.8 ± 62.3 | 5.4 | 0.08 | 0.057 |
| ADG | 20–23 | 25.5 ± 4.4 | 22.8 ± 5.7 | 11.8 | 0.03 | 0.059 |
| FI | 20–23 | 171 ± 29 | 221 ± 80 | −22.6 | 0.0006 | 0.11 |
| FCR | 20–23 | 1.69 ± 0.17 | 2.45 ± 0.75 | −31.0 | <0.0001 | 0.89 |
| AMEn | 20–23 | 3187.0 ± 87.4 | 3065.5 ± 134.2 | 4.0 | <0.0001 | 0.67 |
| FEW | 20–23 | 145.6 ± 48.4 | 270.3 ± 188.2 | −46.1 | 0.0002 | 0.095 |
| DEW | 20–23 | 42.6 ± 9.9 | 97.9 ± 68.6 | −54.5 | <0.0001 | 0.20 |
| FEW/BW | 20–23 | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.39 | −49.3 | <0.0001 | 0.23 |
| DEW/BW | 20–23 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.14 | −59.2 | <0.0001 | 0.38 |
| FEW/FI | 20–23 | 0.84 ± 0.18 | 1.10 ± 0.39 | −24.2 | 0.0004 | 0.13 |
Abbreviations: BW, animal weight (g); DEW, dry excreta weight (g); FCR, feed conversion ratio (g.g−1); FEW, fresh excreta weight (g); FEW/BW, DEW/BW, fresh and dry excreta weight between 20 and 23 d of age relative to BW at 23 d (g g−1); FEW/FI, fresh excreta weight relative to feed intake (g.g−1); FI, feed intake (g).
Mean, SD, and line effect for gizzard weight from hatching to 50 d of age.
| Age (d) | D+ mean (±SD) | D− mean (±SD) | D+/D− ratio (%) | Line effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | −5.0 | 0.47 |
| 7 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 8.1 | 0.14 |
| 14 | 8.2 ± 1.2 | 6.5 ± 1.2 | 26.1 | 0.0024 |
| 23 | 9.5 ± 2.2 | 8.1 ± 1.3 | 17.3 | 0.041 |
| 35 | 15.8 ± 2.6 | 14.0 ± 3.4 | 12.9 | 0.14 |
| 50 | 27.9 ± 6.3 | 22.4 ± 7.2 | 24.6 | 0.048 |
Figure 1Allometric growth of the digestive tract during development. (A) Allometric growth of the gizzard, that is ratio of gizzard weight to BW. (B) Allometric growth of the duodenum, that is ratio of duodenum weight to BW. (C) Allometric growth of the jejunum, that is ratio of jejunum weight to BW. (D) Allometric growth of the ileum, that is ratio of ileum weight to BW. Each dot represents a single individual and box plot are showing median, first and third quartile of each group. D-birds are in red, D+ birds are in light blue.
Mean and SD for jejunum and ileum length and density from 7 to 50 d of age (N = 12 for each line).
| Trait | Age (d) | D+ mean (±SD) | D− mean (±SD) | D+/D− ratio (%) | Line effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jejunum density (g.cm−1) | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 7 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | −15.4 | 0.0093 | |
| 14 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | −28.6 | <0.0001 | |
| 23 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | −13.8 | 0.0091 | |
| 35 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.43 ± 0.08 | −25.6 | 0.0020 | |
| 50 | 0.41 ± 0.10 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | −16.3 | 0.050 | |
| Ileum density (g.cm−1) | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 7 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | −22.2 | 0.0051 | |
| 14 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | −14.3 | 0.020 | |
| 23 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | −14.3 | 0.024 | |
| 35 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | −17.2 | 0.049 | |
| 50 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | −13.5 | 0.13 |
Abbreviation: ND, not determined.
Mean, SD, and line effect of the ratio of proventriculus and gizzard weight to intestine weight from 7 to 50 d of age (N = 12 for each line).
| Trait | Age (d) | D+ mean (±SD) | D− mean (±SD) | D+/D− ratio (%) | Line effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Proventriculus + Gizzard)/Intestine weight (g.g−1) | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 7 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 0.70 ± 0.13 | 12.9 | 0.082 | |
| 14 | 0.66 ± 0.12 | 0.48 ± 0.093 | 37.5 | 0.00050 | |
| 23 | 0.52 ± 0.18 | 0.37 ± 0.068 | 40.7 | 0.00098 | |
| 35 | 0.51 ± 0.15 | 0.37 ± 0.065 | 37.8 | 0.016 | |
| 50 | 0.62 ± 0.19 | 0.46 ± 0.15 | 34.8 | 0.050 |
Abbreviation: ND, not determined.
Figure 2Absorbance and significance of line effect [-log10(P-value)] for sera absorbance between 300 and 600 nm. (A) Absorbance spectra of birds between 7 and 50 d in D+ (dashed line) and D- (plain line). (B) Significance of line effect for spectra of birds between 7 and 50 d. Green stands for measure at 7 d, brown line at 14 d, red line at 23 d, blue at 35 d, and purple at 50 d. In (A), dashed lines are for D+ birds and plain line for D-birds. In (B), the black line is the threshold for a P-value of 0.05, and the dashed line indicates the peak of difference between lines at 492 nm.
Figure 3Correlation between spectra at 7, 14, and 23 d. (A) Pearson correlations between spectra, (B) P-value of Pearson correlations between spectra. Orange, green, and blue lines stand for correlations between 7 and 14 d, between 7 and 23 d, and between 14 and 23 d, respectively. The dashed line indicates the peak of difference between lines at 492 nm and the black line indicates the threshold for a P-value of 0.05.