Literature DB >> 33517725

Cast immobilization is non-inferior to volar locking plates in relation to QuickDASH after one year in patients aged 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial of displaced distal radius fractures.

Sondre Stafsnes Hassellund1,2, John Håkon Williksen1, Marit Mjelde Laane3, Are Pripp4, Carina Paulsen Rosales1, Øyvind Karlsen1, Jan Erik Madsen1,2, Frede Frihagen1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare operative and nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged over 65 years.
METHODS: A total of 100 patients were randomized in this non-inferiority trial, comparing cast immobilization with operation with a volar locking plate. Patients with displaced AO/OTA A and C fractures were eligible if one of the following were found after initial closed reduction: 1) dorsal angulation > 10°; 2) ulnar variance > 3 mm; or 3) intra-articular step-off > 2 mm. Primary outcome measure was the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), EuroQol-5 dimensions 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), range of motion (ROM), grip strength, "satisfaction with wrist function" (score 0 to 10), and complications.
RESULTS: In all, 89 women and 11 men were included. Mean age was 74 years (65 to 91). Nonoperative treatment was non-inferior to operation with a five-point difference in median QuickDASH after 12 months (p = 0.206). After three and six months QuickDASH favoured the operative group (p = 0.010 and 0.030). Median values for PRWHE were 19 (interquartile range (IRQ) 10 to 32) in the operative group versus ten (IQR 1 to 31) in the nonoperative group at three months (p = 0.064), nine (IQR 2 to 20) versus five (IQR 0 to 13) (p = 0.020) at six months, and two (IQR 0 to 12) versus zero (IQR 0 to 8) (p = 0.019) after 12 months. Range of motion was similar between the groups. The EQ-5D-5L index score was better (mean difference 0.07) in the operative group at three and 12 months (p = 0.008 and 0.020). The complication rate was similar (p = 0.220). The operated patients were more satisfied with wrist function (median 8 (IQR 6 to 9) vs 6 (IQR 5 to 7) at three months, p = 0.002; 9 (IQR 7 to 9) vs 8 (IQR 6 to 8) at six months, p = 0.002; and 10 (IQR 8 to 10) vs 8 (IQR 7 to 9) at 12 months, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Nonoperative treatment was non-inferior to operative treatment based on QuickDASH after one year. Patients in the operative group had a faster recovery and were more satisfied with wrist function. Results from previous trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in the elderly vary between favouring the operative group and showing similar results between the treatments. This randomized trial suggests that most elderly patients may be treated nonoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):247-255.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal radius fractures; Elderly; Functional outcome; Malunion; Nonoperative treatment; Operative treatment; RCT

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33517725     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0192.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  Plating vs Closed Reduction for Fractures in the Distal Radius in Older Patients: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrew Lawson; Justine Naylor; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rebecca Ivers; Zsolt J Balogh; Paul Smith; Wei Xuan; Kirsten Howard; Arezoo Vafa; Diana Perriman; Rajat Mittal; Piers Yates; Bertram Rieger; Geoff Smith; Sam Adie; Ilia Elkinson; Woosung Kim; Jai Sungaran; Kim Latendresse; James Wong; Sameer Viswanathan; Keith Landale; Herwig Drobetz; Phong Tran; Richard Page; Sally Beattie; Jonathan Mulford; Ian Incoll; Michael Kale; Bernard Schick; Trent Li; Andrew Higgs; Andrew Oppy; Ian A Harris
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 16.681

2.  Objective Outcome Measures Continue to Improve from 6 to 12 Months after Conservatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly-A Prospective Evaluation of 50 Patients.

Authors:  Rikke Thorninger; Daniel Wæver; Jonas Pedersen; Jens Tvedegaard-Christensen; Michael Tjørnild; Martin Lind; Jan Duedal Rölfing
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over.

Authors:  Sondre Hassellund; Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson; John Håkon Williksen; Torstein Husby; Jan Erik Madsen; Frede Frihagen
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-12

4.  One year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland-the incidence of osteoporotic forearm, arm, and hip fractures.

Authors:  Robert Wilk; Piotr Adamczyk; Wojciech Pluskiewicz; Michał Skrzypek; Marcin Hajzyk; Bogdan Koczy
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Non-operative treatment or volar locking plate fixation for dorsally displaced distal radius fractures in patients over 70 years - a three year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hanna Südow; Sara Severin; Maria Wilcke; Jenny Saving; Olof Sköldenberg; Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 6.  Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: Approaches, Risks and Limitations.

Authors:  Alexus M Cooper; Taylor R Wood; Donald J Scholten Ii; Eben A Carroll
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-08-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.