Michaela Cellina1, Carlo Martinenghi2, Pietro Marino3, Giancarlo Oliva4. 1. Department of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, P.zza Principessa Clotilde, 3, 20121, Milan, Italy. michaela.cellina@asst-fbf-sacco.it. 2. Department of Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, P.zza Principessa Clotilde, 3, 20121, Milan, Italy. 4. Department of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, P.zza Principessa Clotilde, 3, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
Ultrasound, chest X-ray, and computed tomography (CT) have been used with excellent results in diagnosis, first assessment, and follow-up of COVID-19 confirmed and suspected patients. Ultrasound and chest X-ray have the advantages of the wide availability and acquisition at the patient's bed; CT showed high sensitivity in COVID-19 diagnosis. Ground-glass opacities and consolidation are the main CT and X-ray features; the distribution of lung abnormalities is typically bilateral and peripheral. Less typical findings, including pleural effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathies, the bubble air sign, and cavitation, can also be visible on chest CT. Radiologists should be aware of the advantages and limitations of the available imaging techniques and of the different pulmonary aspects of COVID-19 infection.
Ultrasound, chest X-ray, and computed tomography (CT) have been used with excellent results in diagnosis, first assessment, and follow-up of COVID-19 confirmed and suspected patients. Ultrasound and chest X-ray have the advantages of the wide availability and acquisition at the patient's bed; CT showed high sensitivity in COVID-19 diagnosis. Ground-glass opacities and consolidation are the main CT and X-ray features; the distribution of lung abnormalities is typically bilateral and peripheral. Less typical findings, including pleural effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathies, the bubble air sign, and cavitation, can also be visible on chest CT. Radiologists should be aware of the advantages and limitations of the available imaging techniques and of the different pulmonary aspects of COVID-19infection.
In December 2019, the outbreak of epidemical pneumonia, of initially unidentified origin, occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China [1]. Its cause was identified in a new virus, the “2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)” or “severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2,” which was subsequently named coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on January 9, 2020 [1, 2]. As of November 21, 2020, a total of 57,274,018 confirmed cases and 1,368,000 deaths have been reported [3].COVID-19 typically presents with systemic and/or respiratory manifestations [4, 5]. Symptoms and signs are nonspecific. The absence of specific therapies and the limited percentage of the population currently vaccinated make crucial the early detection of disease, with the isolation of the infected subjects from the healthy population.The gold standard for diagnosis is the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on throat swab; however, the results of this test are not immediately available, and some patients can show false-negative results at the onset of the symptoms, depending on the quality of the sample and on the rate of viral replication in the upper respiratory tract [4].Chest imaging can help the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 confirmed and suspected patients.The threshold and the type of imaging in patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia is highly variable and depends on local resources, clinical scenarios, and national recommendations [6].The aim of this pictorial essay is to show the features of COVID-19 pneumonia in all the available imaging techniques, chest ultrasound (US), X-ray, and computed tomography (CT).
Imaging indications
Indications to chest imaging execution in suspected COVID-19infection are still unclear.A multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner Society provided some main and additional recommendations about the use of chest imaging [7], stating that imaging is not indicated as a screening test in asymptomatic subjects and in patients with mild clinical symptoms unless there are at risk for disease progression and that imaging is indicated in suspected cases of COVID-19 with moderate to severe features and in patients with functional impairment after recovery to differentiate between expected abnormalities following COVID-19infection and/or mechanical ventilation, versus a different and potentially treatable process [2].Due to its high sensitivity [8], chest CT is widely used as a first-line imaging technique in suspected cases of COVID-19 who present with moderate-severe clinical features and high pretest probability environment [2, 8].The 5th version diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 issued by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China considered CT as a major modality for diagnosis, even before receiving the RT-PCR tests, and propose CT as a useful test for relieving quickly difficult situations in the context where a huge population is waiting for the RT-PCR test, due to the lack of kits, delay waiting for the results [9].
US
Lung US has been proposed as a potential triage and diagnostic tool in suspected or confirmed COVID-19patients, due to its wide availability, non-invasiveness, and execution at the bedside. This technique has also the advantage that it can be performed by clinicians who are not radiologists and is a useful tool in monitoring ventilated or intubated COVID-19patients in the intensive care units (ICU) [10]. The main US finding in COVID-19 pneumonia consists of B lines, which are vertical hyperechoic artifacts departing from the pleura and directing in-depth, representing thickened peripheral interlobular septa.The visibility of less than 3 B lines on a scan is considered normal; instead, the evidence of a greater number of B lines is pathological (Fig. 1), and their number correlates with disease severity [10, 11].
Fig. 1
Chest US (a) of a COVID-19 patient showing more than 3 B lines (arrows) visible as vertical hyperechoic artifacts originating from the pleural line. Posterobasal chest US scan (b) of a COVID-19 patient showing a peripheral lung consolidation (arrows)
Chest US (a) of a COVID-19patient showing more than 3 B lines (arrows) visible as vertical hyperechoic artifacts originating from the pleural line. Posterobasal chest US scan (b) of a COVID-19patient showing a peripheral lung consolidation (arrows)The presence of an abnormal number of B lines is characteristic of different interstitial syndromes, such as pulmonary edema, interstitial pneumonia, and pulmonary fibrosis, and should be always correlated with the patient’s current symptoms, clinical presentation and medical history, as well with the epidemiological scenario.US patterns vary from focal to diffuse lung involvement. In the most serious cases, the B lines are diffuse and confluent, resulting in a single hyperechoic image identified as “white lung.” Subpleural consolidations can be identified (Fig. 1b).The US does not provide a complete overview of parenchyma, as the assessment of the deep lung portions is limited, and this is the main limitation of the technique and is strongly operator-dependent.
Chest X-ray
Chest X-ray (CXR) is typically the first-line imaging modality for patients with suspected COVID-19infection. It demonstrated limited sensitivity in mild or early COVID-19infection [12], but can be useful for assessing alternative diagnoses, and has a pivotal role in quantifying the severity, monitoring the progression of COVID-19 pneumonia, and evaluating potential complications, as bacterial superinfection, and pneumothorax.The American College of Radiology advises deploying portable radiography machines in the departments dedicated to the acceptance and treatment of suspected or positive COVID-19patients, to perform chest X-Rays when a lung evaluation is medically needed [13].Chest radiography’s main advantages are the wide availability, fast execution, low cost, and acquisition at the patient’s bed [14].Chest radiographs may be normal in early/mild disease, with a reported baseline sensitivity of 69% [12]. The most frequent findings are ground-glass opacities (GGO) (Fig. 2) and consolidation [12, 15–17].
Fig. 2
Chest X-rays of two confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection, showing the bilateral presence of GGO (frames). In (a), the distribution is mainly peripheral, whereas in (b), the abnormalities have both peripheral and central distribution in the right lung. In the upper left field (b), some small consolidations are also present
Chest X-rays of two confirmed cases of COVID-19infection, showing the bilateral presence of GGO (frames). In (a), the distribution is mainly peripheral, whereas in (b), the abnormalities have both peripheral and central distribution in the right lung. In the upper left field (b), some small consolidations are also presentAs opposed to community-acquired bacterial pneumonia which tends to be unilateral and involving a single lobe, consolidations in COVID-19 pneumonia tend to be multifocal, patchy, or confluent (Fig. 3). The distribution of chest abnormalities is most often bilateral, peripheral, and lower zone predominant [12-16].
Fig. 3
Examples of consolidations (frames) in two confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection. In (a), the chest radiograph of a 65-year-old man with cough and fever for 7 days, showing bilateral patchy consolidations. In (b), the chest radiography of a 63-year-old man with cough and fever from 12 days, admitted to the intensive care unit showing extensive bilateral consolidation with a prevalent peripheral location in the lower lung zones
Examples of consolidations (frames) in two confirmed cases of COVID-19infection. In (a), the chest radiograph of a 65-year-old man with cough and fever for 7 days, showing bilateral patchy consolidations. In (b), the chest radiography of a 63-year-old man with cough and fever from 12 days, admitted to the intensive care unit showing extensive bilateral consolidation with a prevalent peripheral location in the lower lung zonesLung opacities may rapidly evolve into a diffuse coalescent or consolidative pattern within 1–3 weeks of symptoms onset. Findings are most extensive about 10–12 days after symptom onset [12] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Changes in lung abnormalities during the disease. Chest X-ray of a 58-year-old man executed on March 18 (a) and on March 30 (b). The first X-ray was acquired at 2 days from the onset of the symptoms and showed bilateral mainly peripheral GGO, and small patchy consolidation in the left upper field. X-ray following at 12 days showed reduced expansion of the pulmonary fields, with the worsening of the abnormalities and evidence of bilateral consolidation and left pleural effusion (white arrows)
Changes in lung abnormalities during the disease. Chest X-ray of a 58-year-old man executed on March 18 (a) and on March 30 (b). The first X-ray was acquired at 2 days from the onset of the symptoms and showed bilateral mainly peripheral GGO, and small patchy consolidation in the left upper field. X-ray following at 12 days showed reduced expansion of the pulmonary fields, with the worsening of the abnormalities and evidence of bilateral consolidation and left pleural effusion (white arrows)Pleural effusion is rare (3%) [12] (Fig. 7b) and seems to be a sign of severe disease [18]. Lung cavitation is a rare finding in COVID-19patients [19] (Fig. 5).
Fig. 7
Examples of lung consolidations (frames) in COVID-19 patients. In (a), the consolidation is associated with GGO (white arrow) and crazy paving pattern (thin arrows); in (b), the consolidations are patchy, with peripheral posterior location; patchy GGO are also present (arrows). In (c), the consolidations are bilateral and confluent
Fig. 5
Chest X-ray (a) and coronal reconstruction of the unenhanced CT of a 58-year-old COVID-19 male patient admitted to the ICU showing bilateral diffuse airspace opacities and the presence of oval areas of hyperlucency corresponding at CT to cavitation (frames)
Chest X-ray (a) and coronal reconstruction of the unenhanced CT of a 58-year-old COVID-19 male patient admitted to the ICU showing bilateral diffuse airspace opacities and the presence of oval areas of hyperlucency corresponding at CT to cavitation (frames)Pneumothorax is also rather uncommon [20]; it seems to be related to inflammation-induced pulmonary parenchymal injury and necrosis with the development of air leaks into the pleural cavity, a mechanism like that noted in patients during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003 [21].Diffuse airspace opacities in patients can be seen in severe cases, complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); when lung disease involves the majority of the pulmonary parenchyma, patients are typically hypoxic and require intubation with mechanical intubation.Chest X-ray may help the management of intensive care unit patients; however, daily chest radiographs are not indicated in stable intubated individuals [7].Chest X-ray severity score, based on the extension of lung abnormalities, has been proposed by some studies [12, 14, 16] and proved to be an independent predictor of the patient’s outcome [12, 14].
Chest CT
According to the American College of Radiology recommendations, chest CT should not be used as a screening tool for COVID-19; CT should be used sparingly and reserved for hospitalized, symptomatic patients with specific clinical indications for CT [13].In fact, the CT execution for large cohorts of patients carries multiple risks, as the depletion of personal protective equipment, due to excessive usage, transport of critical patients, increased risk of viral transmission, ionizing radiation exposures, and the time required to clean and disinfect equipment after imaging of patients suspected of having COVID-19 [22].CT findings of COVID-19infection are nonspecific, highly overlapping with those of other types of viral pneumonia []. Different imaging features and patterns have been described, as well as different time course and disease severity [232425].The most common findings are GGO, consolidation, and crazy paving appearance, with typical bilateral, peripheral, and basal in distribution [23-25]. Different imaging manifestations can be related to different examinations timing after the onset of the patients’ symptoms, but maybe also correlated to different pre-existing patients’ clinical characteristics/comorbidities.GGO are defined as hazy areas of slightly increased density without cancelation of bronchial and vascular contours that may be caused by the partial displacement of air due to partial filling of airspaces or interstitial thickening [26]; in COVID-19patients, they may be unilateral or bilateral, mainly with a subpleural distribution, and have been reported with an incidence up to 91% [25, 27] (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Unenhanced chest CT scans showing some examples of GGO (frames) in COVID-19 patients. In (a), the abnormality is in the right lower lobe posteriorly; in (b), GGO are bilaterally recognizable, with peripheral and peri-broncho-vascular distribution. In (c), the GGO are patchy, with bilateral involvement of the lower lobes
Unenhanced chest CT scans showing some examples of GGO (frames) in COVID-19patients. In (a), the abnormality is in the right lower lobe posteriorly; in (b), GGO are bilaterally recognizable, with peripheral and peri-broncho-vascular distribution. In (c), the GGO are patchy, with bilateral involvement of the lower lobesConsolidation consists of alveolar air replaced by pathological fluids, cells, or tissue, on chest CT is visible as increased pulmonary parenchymal density that obscures the margins of the underlying vessels and airway walls (Fig. 7). In COVID-19, consolidation is reported with variable frequency, from 5% [28] to 63% [25], with increased frequency at 2 weeks after symptoms onset [29].Examples of lung consolidations (frames) in COVID-19patients. In (a), the consolidation is associated with GGO (white arrow) and crazy paving pattern (thin arrows); in (b), the consolidations are patchy, with peripheral posterior location; patchy GGO are also present (arrows). In (c), the consolidations are bilateral and confluentCrazy paving has been observed in up to 36% of cases [30] and is represented by thickened interlobular septa and intralobular lines superimposed on a GGO background; this sign may result from the alveolar edema and interstitial inflammatory of acute lung injury [31] (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8
Unhenanced chest CT of 65-year-old COVID-19 patient admitted to ICU. The tracheal cannula has been wrongly positioned in the right bronchus. Bilateral evidence of extensive airspace abnormalities, with peripheral posterior consolidations and crazy paving pattern and concomitant air bronchogram sign (frame)
Unhenanced chest CT of 65-year-old COVID-19patient admitted to ICU. The tracheal cannula has been wrongly positioned in the right bronchus. Bilateral evidence of extensive airspace abnormalities, with peripheral posterior consolidations and crazy paving pattern and concomitant air bronchogram sign (frame)The reticular pattern is the thickening of pulmonary interstitial structures such as interlobular septa and intralobular lines [26] and was reported in up to 22% of patients [32] (Fig. 9).
Fig. 9
Examples of reticular patterns in COVID-19 male patients (a 53-year-old, b 63-year-old) showing reticular pattern (frames) with the bilateral peripheral distribution
Examples of reticular patterns in COVID-19 male patients (a 53-year-old, b 63-year-old) showing reticular pattern (frames) with the bilateral peripheral distributionAir bronchogram is recognizable as air-filled bronchi on a background of the opaque lung (Fig. 8); the reported incidence in COVID-19patients is up to 80% [32]. Bronchial wall thickening is considered a manifestation of bronchial wall inflammatory damage and has been found in up to 23% of cases [30].Halo sign is represented by nodules or masses surrounded by GGO and described with an incidence of 2.4% [33].Subpleural linear opacities are curvilinear opacities parallel to the pleural surface observed in 20% of cases [30] (Fig. 10.)
Fig. 10
Chest CT of a 48-year-old patient showing bilateral peripheral linear opacities with course parallel to the pleural surface (frames). A small nodule with peripheral GGO, resulting in a halo sign is present in the lower left lobe (white arrow)
Chest CT of a 48-year-old patient showing bilateral peripheral linear opacities with course parallel to the pleural surface (frames). A small nodule with peripheral GGO, resulting in a halo sign is present in the lower left lobe (white arrow)The air bubble sign is a small air containing space; it might be a pathological dilatation of a physiological space or a cross-section of bronchiectasis or could be associated with the process of consolidation resorption [30] (Fig. 11).
Fig. 11
Chest CT of a 63-year-old COVID-19 patient. In the left lower lobe, posteriorly, a small air-filled cavity in the context of lung consolidation is present (frame). This is the “air bubble sign.” Areas of the reticular pattern are bilaterally recognizable
Chest CT of a 63-year-old COVID-19patient. In the left lower lobe, posteriorly, a small air-filled cavity in the context of lung consolidation is present (frame). This is the “air bubble sign.” Areas of the reticular pattern are bilaterally recognizableThe vascular enlargement is the dilatation of the pulmonary vessels around or within the airspace opacities, reported in about 64% of cases [33].Mediastinal lymphadenopathies are lymph nodes with short axis > 1 cm; together with pleural effusion are considered risk factors for severe disease [30]. Their mean incidence is about 5% [33].Cavitation consists of a gas-filled space, delimited by thick walls that can contain a fluid level. Its origin is uncertain: It can result from the cystic degeneration of lung consolidation or can be considered a sign of superinfection; the incidence is 0.1% [33] (Fig. 12).
Fig. 12
Chest CT of a 73-year-old COVID-19 patient, showing a bilateral diffuse reticular pattern of abnormalities; in the left lower lobe, posteriorly, cavitation is visible as an air-filled component including a fluid level (frame)
Chest CT of a 73-year-old COVID-19patient, showing a bilateral diffuse reticular pattern of abnormalities; in the left lower lobe, posteriorly, cavitation is visible as an air-filled component including a fluid level (frame)Chest abnormalities in COVID-19 pneumonia change over time. GGO tend to progress in extent and attenuation value and evolve either towards crazy paving areas or towards linear and retractile consolidation areas. Lung alterations are maximal at around day 10–12 after the onset of the symptoms and then generally decrease progressively in size and attenuation value. Four stages have been reported: early/initial stage (0–4 days from the onset of the symptoms), normal CT or GGO only; progressive stage (5–8 days), increased GGO and crazy paving appearance; peak stage (9–13 days), predominance of consolidation; and absorption stage (> 14 days), improvement in the lung abnormalities with the appearance of the fibrous stripes (Fig. 13) [24].
Fig. 13
Pre-discharge chest CT of a COVID-19 male patient, at 27 days from the onset of the symptoms. Bilateral linear opacities are recognizable (white arrows)
Pre-discharge chest CT of a COVID-19 male patient, at 27 days from the onset of the symptoms. Bilateral linear opacities are recognizable (white arrows)In discharged patients, the “tinted sign,” visible as an extension of the GGO with a decreased density, has been observed with an incidence of 32% (Fig. 14) [34].
Fig. 14
Coronal reconstruction of the pre- (a) and post-discharge CT a 75-year-old COVID-19 patient. The first CT (a), executed on April 15, at 30 days from the onset of the symptoms, showed bilateral irregular linear opacities and peripheral consolidations. The follow-up CT, performed on June 24, showed bilateral extensive faded GGO in the location of the previous abnormalities. This can be defined as a “tinted sign”
Coronal reconstruction of the pre- (a) and post-discharge CT a 75-year-old COVID-19patient. The first CT (a), executed on April 15, at 30 days from the onset of the symptoms, showed bilateral irregular linear opacities and peripheral consolidations. The follow-up CT, performed on June 24, showed bilateral extensive faded GGO in the location of the previous abnormalities. This can be defined as a “tinted sign”
Conclusion
In conclusion, we illustrated the imaging findings of COVID-19 pneumonia that can be assessed with all the available imaging techniques. Appropriate knowledge of these features helps radiologists and clinicians in the diagnosis and management of the affected patients.
Authors: Hyunjoong W Kim; K M Capaccione; Gen Li; Lyndon Luk; Reginald S Widemon; Ozair Rahman; Volkan Beylergil; Ryan Mitchell; Belinda M D'Souza; Jay S Leb; Shifali Dumeer; Stuart Bentley-Hibbert; Michael Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar; John H M Austin; Mary Salvatore Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2020-06-22
Authors: Geoffrey D Rubin; Christopher J Ryerson; Linda B Haramati; Nicola Sverzellati; Jeffrey P Kanne; Suhail Raoof; Neil W Schluger; Annalisa Volpi; Jae-Joon Yim; Ian B K Martin; Deverick J Anderson; Christina Kong; Talissa Altes; Andrew Bush; Sujal R Desai; Onathan Goldin; Jin Mo Goo; Marc Humbert; Yoshikazu Inoue; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Fengming Luo; Peter J Mazzone; Mathias Prokop; Martine Remy-Jardin; Luca Richeldi; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Athol U Wells; Ann N Leung Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amir Pakray; David Walker; Alexander Figacz; Stephen Kilanowski; Casey Rhodes; Shashin Doshi; Mary Coffey Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2020-05-25
Authors: Marco Allinovi; Alberto Parise; Martina Giacalone; Andrea Amerio; Marco Delsante; Anna Odone; Andrea Franci; Fabrizio Gigliotti; Silvia Amadasi; Davide Delmonte; Niccolò Parri; Angelo Mangia Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Ho Yuen Frank Wong; Hiu Yin Sonia Lam; Ambrose Ho-Tung Fong; Siu Ting Leung; Thomas Wing-Yan Chin; Christine Shing Yen Lo; Macy Mei-Sze Lui; Jonan Chun Yin Lee; Keith Wan-Hang Chiu; Tom Wai-Hin Chung; Elaine Yuen Phin Lee; Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Ivan Fan Ngai Hung; Tina Poy Wing Lam; Michael D Kuo; Ming-Yen Ng Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J C L Rodrigues; S S Hare; A Edey; A Devaraj; J Jacob; A Johnstone; R McStay; A Nair; G Robinson Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 2.350