| Literature DB >> 33516744 |
José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera1, Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez2.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact of surgical mask use in cognitive and psychophysiological response of university students during a lesson. We analyzed 50 volunteers university students (age 20.2 ± 2.9) in two 150 min lessons. i. personal class using a surgical mask and ii. online class with student at home without the mask. Blood oxygen saturation, heart rate and heart rate variability, mental fatigue and reaction time were measured before and immediately after both lectures. We found how both lesson produced an increase in mental fatigue, reaction time and autonomous sympathetic modulation, being heart rate significantly higher (77.7 ± 18.2 vs. 89.3 ± 11.2 bpm, not mask, mask respectively) and blood oxygen saturation significantly lower (98.4 ± 0.5 vs. 96.0 ± 1.8%, mask, not mask respectively) using the surgical mask. The use of surgical mask during a 150 min university lesson produced an increased heart rate and a decrease in blood oxygen saturation, not significantly affecting the mental fatigue perception, reaction time and time, frequency and nonlinear hear rate variability domains of students.Entities:
Keywords: Blood oxygen saturation; COVID-19; Education; Fatigue; Heart rate variability; Surgical mask
Year: 2021 PMID: 33516744 PMCID: PMC7844352 DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Behav ISSN: 0031-9384
Study variables modification with and without the surgical mask conditions evaluated.
| Non-Surgical Mask | Surgical Mask | P | η2 | Moment Comparison | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre (1) | Post (2) | Pre (3) | Post (4) | ||||
| Mental fatigue perception | 37.2 ± 10.8 | 48.5 ± 9.4 | 38.4 ± 13.2 | 56.3 ± 16.2 | .284 | 2>1; 2>3; 4>1; 4>3 | |
| Reaction time (ms) | .621±.134 | .739±.151 | .655±.150 | .783±.191 | .001 | .150 | 2>1; 4>1; 4>3 |
| Blood oxygen saturation (%) | 98.2±.0.2 | 98.4 ± 0.5 | 98.4 ± 1.1 | 96.0 ± 1.8 | .390 | 1>4; 3>4; 2>4 | |
| Mean RR (ms) | 903.8 ± 135.9 | 804.4 ± 152.2 | 965.8 ± 109.1 | 854.0 ± 143.1 | .166 | 1>2; 3>2; 3>4 | |
| Mean HR (bpm) | 71.4 ± 14.6 | 77.7 ± 18.2 | 78.6 ± 9.4 | 89.3 ± 11.2 | .288 | 1<4; 3<4; 2<4 | |
| RMSSD (ms) | 75.1 ± 14.1 | 55.8 ± 18.0 | 77.6 ± 14.8 | 53.9 ± 16.9 | .320 | 1>2; 1>4; 3>2; 3>4 | |
| LF (n.u.) | 58.5 ± 8.1 | 63.4 ± 11.0 | 60.1 ± 8.4 | 65.4 ± 10.5 | .047 | .077 | |
| HF (n.u.) | 46.4 ± 10.8 | 37.8 ± 12.7 | 45.6 ± 10.7 | 34.5 ± 10.6 | .175 | 1>2; 1>4; 3>4 | |
| SD1 (ms) | 48.4 ± 10.9 | 45.2 ± 12.1 | 48.8 ± 12.8 | 42.3 ± 11.5 | .171 | .049 | |
| SD2 (ms) | 84.6 ± 12.4 | 91.7 ± 13.5 | 83.7 ± 8.9 | 91.5 ± 11.3 | .019 | .095 | |
Mean RR, RR intervals mean, Mean HR, heart rate mean; RMSSD, root-mean square differences of successive heartbeat intervals; LF: low-frequency band; HF: high-frequency band; SD1, transverse axis; SD2, longitudinal axis; ms, milliseconds; n.u., normalized units.
Correlation analysis results.
| Mental Fatigue Perception | Reaction Time | Blood oxygen saturation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction Time | r | .492 | ||
| p | 0.000 | |||
| Blood oxygen saturation | r | −0.270 | −0.253 | |
| p | 0.002 | 0.005 | ||
| Mean RR | r | −0.225 | −0.144 | −0.033 |
| p | 0.022 | 0.145 | 0.740 | |
| Mean HR | r | −0.087 | −0.045 | 0.082 |
| p | 0.353 | 0.632 | 0.031 | |
| RMSSD | r | −0.406 | −0.287 | .207 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.026 | |
| LF | r | .435 | .440 | −0.176 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.058 | |
| HF | r | −0.331 | −0.446 | .240 |
| p | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.010 | |
| SD1 | r | −0.192 | −0.304 | .274 |
| p | 0.039 | 0.001 | 0.003 | |
| SD2 | r | .273 | 0.132 | −0.092 |
| p | 0.003 | 0.158 | 0.328 |
Mean RR, RR intervals mean, Mean HR, heart rate mean; RMSSD, root-mean square differences of successive heartbeat intervals; LF: low-frequency band; HF: high-frequency band; SD1, transverse axis; SD2, longitudinal axis; ms, milliseconds; n.u., normalized units.