Literature DB >> 33516465

What are the limits to feed intake of broilers on bulky feeds?

James Taylor1, Panagiotis Sakkas2, Ilias Kyriazakis3.   

Abstract

The view that genetic selection for carcass yield has limited the size of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of modern broilers has sparked concerns that their capacity to cope with energy dilution or bulk is also limited. We investigated the capacity of male Ross 308 broilers to deal with increasing levels of bulk and aimed to identify a feed bulk dimension responsible for limiting feed intake (FI). About 528 day-old broilers were allocated to 48 pens and offered a common starter feed until day 8, and 1 of 7 feeds from day 8 to 36 of age: a basal control (B), which was diluted to 3 levels (15, 30, or 45%) with either oat hulls (OH) or sugar beet pulp (SBP). Feed intake was measured daily and birds were dissected for GIT measurements at day 15, 22, and 36. Feed intake increased in birds offered OH15 (135 g/d), OH30 (140 g/d), and SBP15 (138 g/d) compared with birds offered the B feed (106 g/d; SEM 2.4). By increasing FI, birds were able to compensate for the lower energy content of their feeds. The greatest increase in FI was seen on OH30: its energy content (2,273 kcal/kg) was 26% lower than the B feed (3,081 kcal/kg). There was evidence of adaptation on the bulky feeds, as during the last week only birds on SBP45 were limited in FI and performance. The relative weights of the GIT were greater in the SBP than OH series, suggesting that the former needed to accommodate a higher bulk intake. For the OH series the increase in the relative GIT weights was confined to the gizzard and small intestine; whereas for the SBP series, the increase was extended to proventriculus and large intestine. Because only SBP45 was limiting FI, we were unable to identify a bulk dimension to be used to predict FI. Our data reject the suggestion that modern broilers have a reduced ability to cope with reductions in feed energy content.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broiler; bulk; feed intake; gastrointestinal tract; sugar beet pulp

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33516465      PMCID: PMC7936167          DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

1.  Predicting nutrient responses in poultry: future challenges.

Authors:  R M Gous
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of the bacterial community and intestinal development of different genetic lines of chickens.

Authors:  B S Lumpkins; A B Batal; M D Lee
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The effects of genetic selection for increased growth rate on mucosal and muscle weights in the different regions of the small intestine of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus).

Authors:  M A Mitchell; M W Smith
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1991

4.  Wheat particle size, insoluble fibre sources and whole wheat feeding influence gizzard musculature and nutrient utilisation to different extents in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Abdollahi; Faegheh Zaefarian; Hayley Hunt; Muhammad Naveed Anwar; David G Thomas; Velmurugu Ravindran
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.130

5.  Age and dietary energy effect on broiler abdominal fat deposition.

Authors:  J W Deaton; B D Lott
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs.

Authors:  H Jørgensen; X Q Zhao; B O Eggum
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Effects of diet particle size on digestive parameters in D+ and D- genetic chicken lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency.

Authors:  N Rougière; J Gomez; S Mignon-Grasteau; B Carré
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Evaluation of oats with varying hull inclusion in broiler diets up to 35 days.

Authors:  D V Scholey; A Marshall; A A Cowan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Artificial selection for improved energy efficiency is reaching its limits in broiler chickens.

Authors:  C W Tallentire; I Leinonen; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of the gastrointestinal tract of a dual-purpose to a broiler chicken line: A qualitative and quantitative macroscopic and microscopic study.

Authors:  Zaher Alshamy; Kenneth C Richardson; Hana Hünigen; Hafez Mohamed Hafez; Johanna Plendl; Salah Al Masri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.