Tarjei Tørre Asprusten1, Line Sletner1, Vegard Bruun Bratholm Wyller2,3. 1. Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Health, Akershus University Hospital, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. 2. Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Health, Akershus University Hospital, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. v.b.b.wyller@medisin.uio.no. 3. Division of Medicine and Laboratory Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. v.b.b.wyller@medisin.uio.no.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined according to subjective symptoms only, and several conflicting case definition exist. Previous research has discovered certain biological alterations. The aim of the present study was to explore possible subgroups based on biological markers within a widely defined cohort of adolescent CFS patients and investigate to what extent eventual subgroups are associated with other variables. METHODS: The Norwegian Study of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adolescents: Pathophysiology and Intervention Trial (NorCAPITAL) has previously performed detailed investigation of immunological, autonomic, neuroendocrine, cognitive and sensory processing functions in an adolescent group of CFS patients recruited according to wide diagnostic criteria. In the present study, hierarchical cluster analyses (Ward's method) were performed using representative variables from all these domains. Associations between clusters and constitutional factors (including candidate genetic markers), diagnostic criteria, subjective symptoms and prognosis were explored by standard statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (26.7% males, mean age 15.4 years) were included. The final cluster analyses revealed six clusters labelled pain tolerant & good cognitions, restored HPA dynamics, orthostatic intolerance, low-grade inflammation, pain intolerant & poor cognitions, and high vagal (parasympathetic) activity, respectively. There was substantial overlap between clusters. The pain intolerant & poor cognitions-cluster was associated with low functional abilities and quality of life, and adherence to the Canada 2003 diagnostic criteria for CFS. No other statistically significant cluster associations were discovered. CONCLUSION: Within a widely defined cohort of adolescent CFS patients, clusters could be delineated, but no distinct subgroups could be identified. Associations between clusters and constitutional factors, subjective symptoms and prognosis were scarce. These results question the clinical usefulness of searching for CFS subgroups, as well as the validity of the most "narrow" CFS diagnostic criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT01040429.
BACKGROUND:Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined according to subjective symptoms only, and several conflicting case definition exist. Previous research has discovered certain biological alterations. The aim of the present study was to explore possible subgroups based on biological markers within a widely defined cohort of adolescent CFSpatients and investigate to what extent eventual subgroups are associated with other variables. METHODS: The Norwegian Study of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adolescents: Pathophysiology and Intervention Trial (NorCAPITAL) has previously performed detailed investigation of immunological, autonomic, neuroendocrine, cognitive and sensory processing functions in an adolescent group of CFS patients recruited according to wide diagnostic criteria. In the present study, hierarchical cluster analyses (Ward's method) were performed using representative variables from all these domains. Associations between clusters and constitutional factors (including candidate genetic markers), diagnostic criteria, subjective symptoms and prognosis were explored by standard statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (26.7% males, mean age 15.4 years) were included. The final cluster analyses revealed six clusters labelled pain tolerant & good cognitions, restored HPA dynamics, orthostatic intolerance, low-grade inflammation, pain intolerant & poor cognitions, and high vagal (parasympathetic) activity, respectively. There was substantial overlap between clusters. The pain intolerant & poor cognitions-cluster was associated with low functional abilities and quality of life, and adherence to the Canada 2003 diagnostic criteria for CFS. No other statistically significant cluster associations were discovered. CONCLUSION: Within a widely defined cohort of adolescent CFSpatients, clusters could be delineated, but no distinct subgroups could be identified. Associations between clusters and constitutional factors, subjective symptoms and prognosis were scarce. These results question the clinical usefulness of searching for CFS subgroups, as well as the validity of the most "narrow" CFS diagnostic criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT01040429.
Authors: J Fortin; W Habenbacher; A Heller; A Hacker; R Grüllenberger; J Innerhofer; H Passath; Ch Wagner; G Haitchi; D Flotzinger; R Pacher; P Wach Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2005-08-29 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Megan E Roerink; Sean H P P Roerink; Nadine Skoluda; Marieke E van der Schaaf; Ad R M M Hermus; Jos W M van der Meer; Hans Knoop; Urs M Nater Journal: Horm Behav Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.587
Authors: Dieter Wagner; Rosane Nisenbaum; Christine Heim; James F Jones; Elizabeth R Unger; William C Reeves Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2005-07-22
Authors: Even Fagermoen; Dag Sulheim; Anette Winger; Anders M Andersen; Johannes Gjerstad; Kristin Godang; Peter C Rowe; J Philip Saul; Eva Skovlund; Vegard Bruun Wyller Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 2.125