Literature DB >> 33516226

Application of discrete choice experiments to estimate value of life: a national study protocol in Iran.

Negar Mirzaee1, Amirhossein Takian2,3,4, Farshad Farzadfar5, Rajabali Daroudi1, Ali Kazemi Karyani6, Ali Akbari Sari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global concerns regarding the significant burden of non-communicable diseases and injuries (NCDIs) exist from both public health and economic perspectives. Our research focuses on the reduction of fatal risks due to NCDIs and the citizens' preferences about health programs and intervention to reduce premature death due to NCDIs. Governments and health authorities need reliable evidence and information to prioritize the interests of their citizens. One crucial piece of evidence to justify the resources spent on NCDIs is the value derived from the interventions on prevention and NCDIs control. This concept is usually called "Value of Statistical Life" (VSL), meaning the monetary value that individuals place on changes in the risk levels of life- threatening events. To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, our study will estimate the statistical value of life for selected interventions for the prevention and control of NCDIs at both national and sub-national levels in the context of Iran. This paper reports the development of a national protocol through Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) method. METHODS AND DESIGNS: Our study comprises several stages: (a) a literature review to identify the attributes and levels of the prevention programs and Willingness to Pay (WTP) for reducing the NCDI's fatal risks; (b) experimental design to assessing, prioritizing, and finalizing the identified attributes and levels; (c) instrumental design to conduct face-to-face structured survey interviews of 3180 respondents aged 18-69 across the entire country; (d) statistical analysis to estimate the results through the Mixed Multinomial logit (MMNL) model. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that our findings will help build a stronger empirical basis for monetizing the value of small changes in selected fatality risks. It paves the way for other national or vast VSL estimates for NCDIs, as well as other major causes of morbidity and mortality in the context of Iran, and perhaps other low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33516226      PMCID: PMC7846904          DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00259-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc        ISSN: 1478-7547


  16 in total

Review 1.  Theory versus practice: a review of 'willingness-to-pay' in health and health care.

Authors:  J A Olsen; R D Smith
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care: a critical assessment.

Authors:  Richard D Smith
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Valuing the adult health effects of air pollution in Chinese cities.

Authors:  Robert W Mead; Victor Brajer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature.

Authors:  A Diener; B O'Brien; A Gafni
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.

Authors:  Shehzad Ali; Sarah Ronaldson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods.

Authors:  O Sarobidy Rakotonarivo; Marije Schaafsma; Neal Hockley
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Protocol Design for Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Studies of Surveillance of Risk Factors of Non-Communicable Diseases in Iran: STEPs 2016.

Authors:  Shirin Djalalinia; Mitra Modirian; Ali Sheidaei; Moein Yoosefi; Hossein Zokaiee; Bahman Damirchilu; Zohreh Mahmoudi; Negar Mahmoudi; Mohammad Javad Hajipour; Niloofar Peykari; Nazila Rezaei; Rosa Haghshenas; Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi; Alireza Delavari; Mohammad Mehdi Gouya; Shohreh Naderimagham; Ahmad Kousha; Alireza Moghisi; Alireza Mahdavihezaveh; Kambiz Abachizadeh; Reza Majdzadeh; Ali Akbar Sayyari; Reza Malekzadeh; Bagher Larijani; Farshad Farzadfar
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.354

8.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Attribute level overlap (and color coding) can reduce task complexity, improve choice consistency, and decrease the dropout rate in discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Marcel F Jonker; Bas Donkers; Esther de Bekker-Grob; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.