Mahboob Ul Haq1, Sven G Hinderaker2, Razia Fatima3, Hemant Deepak Shewade4, Einar Heldal5, Abdullah Latif3, Ajay M V Kumar6. 1. University of Bergen, Norway; Common Management Unit (HIV/AIDS, TB & Malaria), Islamabad, Pakistan. Electronic address: mahboob0345@yahoo.com. 2. University of Bergen, Norway. 3. Common Management Unit (HIV/AIDS, TB & Malaria), Islamabad, Pakistan. 4. Centre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France; The Union South-East Asia Office, New Delhi, India. 5. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 6. Centre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Paris, France; The Union South-East Asia Office, New Delhi, India; Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (deemed to be University), Mangaluru, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pakistan implemented initiatives to detect tuberculosis (TB) patients through extended contact screening (ECS); it improved case detection but treatment outcomes need assessment. OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment outcomes of pulmonary TB (PTB) patients detected by ECS with those detected by routine passive case finding (PCF). METHODS: A cohort study using secondary program data conducted in Lahore, Faisalabad and Rawalpindi districts and Islamabad in 2013-15. We used log binomial regression models to assess if ECS was associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes (death, loss-to-follow-up, failure, not evaluated) after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We included 79,431 people with PTB; 4604 (5.8%) were detected by ECS with 4052 (88%) bacteriologically confirmed. In all PTB patients the proportion with unfavorable outcomes was not significantly different in ECS group (9.6%) compared to PCF (9.9%), however, among bacteriologically confirmed patients unfavorable outcomes were significantly lower in ECS (9.9%) than PCF group (11.6%, P = 0.001). ECS was associated with a lower risk of unfavorable outcomes (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.99) among 'all PTB' patients and bacteriologically confirmed PTB patients (aRR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82-1.00). CONCLUSION: In PTB patients detected by ECS the treatment outcomes were not inferior to those detected by PCF.
BACKGROUND: Pakistan implemented initiatives to detect tuberculosis (TB) patients through extended contact screening (ECS); it improved case detection but treatment outcomes need assessment. OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment outcomes of pulmonary TB (PTB) patients detected by ECS with those detected by routine passive case finding (PCF). METHODS: A cohort study using secondary program data conducted in Lahore, Faisalabad and Rawalpindi districts and Islamabad in 2013-15. We used log binomial regression models to assess if ECS was associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes (death, loss-to-follow-up, failure, not evaluated) after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We included 79,431 people with PTB; 4604 (5.8%) were detected by ECS with 4052 (88%) bacteriologically confirmed. In all PTB patients the proportion with unfavorable outcomes was not significantly different in ECS group (9.6%) compared to PCF (9.9%), however, among bacteriologically confirmed patients unfavorable outcomes were significantly lower in ECS (9.9%) than PCF group (11.6%, P = 0.001). ECS was associated with a lower risk of unfavorable outcomes (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.99) among 'all PTB' patients and bacteriologically confirmed PTB patients (aRR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82-1.00). CONCLUSION: In PTB patients detected by ECS the treatment outcomes were not inferior to those detected by PCF.