Literature DB >> 33515482

Effect of hay type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in horses.

Rachel J Sorensen1, James S Drouillard1, Teresa L Douthit1, Qinghong Ran2, Douglas G Marthaler2, Qing Kang3, Christopher I Vahl3, James M Lattimer1.   

Abstract

The effect of hay type on the microbiome of the equine gastrointestinal tract is relatively unexplored. Our objective was to characterize the cecal and fecal microbiome of mature horses consuming alfalfa or Smooth Bromegrass (brome) hay. Six cecally cannulated horses were used in a split-plot design run as a crossover in two periods. The whole plot treatment was ad libitum access to brome or alfalfa hay fed over two 21-d acclimation periods with subplots of sampling location (cecum and rectum) and sampling hour. Each acclimation period was followed by a 24-h collection period where cecal and fecal samples were collected every 3 h for analysis of pH and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Fecal and cecal samples were pooled and sent to a commercial lab (MR DNA, Shallowater, TX) for the amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq. The main effects of hay on VFA, pH, and taxonomic abundances were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.4 with fixed effects of hay, hour, location, period, and all possible interactions and random effect of horse. Alpha and beta diversities were analyzed using the R Dame package. Horses fed alfalfa had greater fecal than cecal pH (P ≤ 0.05), whereas horses fed brome had greater cecal than fecal pH (P ≤ 0.05). Regardless of hay type, total VFA concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the cecum than in feces, and alfalfa resulted in greater (P ≤ 0.05) VFA concentrations than brome in both sampling locations. Alpha diversity was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in fecal compared with cecal samples. Microbial community structure within each sampling location and hay type differed from one another (P ≤ 0.05). Bacteroidetes were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the cecum compared with the rectum, regardless of hay type. Firmicutes and Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the feces compared with cecal samples of alfalfa-fed horses. In all, fermentation parameters and bacterial abundances were impacted by hay type and sampling location in the hindgut.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; fermentation; hay; hindgut; horse; microbiome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33515482      PMCID: PMC7846146          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  28 in total

1.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Changes in faecal bacteria associated with concentrate and forage-only diets fed to horses in training.

Authors:  B Willing; A Vörös; S Roos; C Jones; A Jansson; J E Lindberg
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Dynamic assessment of microbial ecology (DAME): a web app for interactive analysis and visualization of microbial sequencing data.

Authors:  Brian D Piccolo; Umesh D Wankhade; Sree V Chintapalli; Sudeepa Bhattacharyya; Luo Chunqiao; Kartik Shankar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Influence of short-term dietary starch inclusion on the equine cecal microbiome.

Authors:  C M Warzecha; J A Coverdale; J E Janecka; J L Leatherwood; W E Pinchak; T A Wickersham; J C McCann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Characterization of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses.

Authors:  Holly L Stewart; Dipti Pitta; Nagaraju Indugu; Bonnie Vecchiarelli; Julie B Engiles; Louise L Southwood
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Physiological diversity of rumen spirochetes.

Authors:  B J Paster; E Canale-Parola
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Nutritional iron turned inside out: intestinal stress from a gut microbial perspective.

Authors:  Guus A M Kortman; Manuela Raffatellu; Dorine W Swinkels; Harold Tjalsma
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Daniel McDonald; Morgan N Price; Julia Goodrich; Eric P Nawrocki; Todd Z DeSantis; Alexander Probst; Gary L Andersen; Rob Knight; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change.

Authors:  Karlette A Fernandes; Sandra Kittelmann; Christopher W Rogers; Erica K Gee; Charlotte F Bolwell; Emma N Bermingham; David G Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The OMICS of methane emissions.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Oxidative cleavage of cellulose in the horse gut.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Weishuai Yu; Xiuna Guo; Jinyin Chen; Donghui Xia; Jie Yu; Duochuan Li
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 5.328

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.