Stacey M Cornelson1, Ashley N Ruff2, Courtney Wells3, Roberta Sclocco2,4, Norman W Kettner2. 1. Department of Radiology, Logan University, 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA. staceycornelson@logan.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Logan University, 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA. 3. Human Performance Center, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Athinoula. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The sciatic nerve innervates the hamstring muscles. Occasionally, the sciatic nerve is injured along with a hamstring muscle. Detailed biomechanical and sensory thresholds of these structures are not well-characterized. Therefore, we designed a prospective study that explored high-resolution ultrasound (US) at multiple sites to evaluate properties of the sciatic nerve, including cross-sectional area (CSA) and shear-wave elastography (SWE). We also assessed SWE of each hamstring muscle at multiple sites. Mechanical algometry was obtained from the sciatic nerve and hamstring muscles to assess multi-site pressure pain threshold (PPT). METHODS: Seventy-nine asymptomatic sciatic nerves and 147 hamstring muscles (25 males, 24 females) aged 18-50 years were evaluated. One chiropractic radiologist with 4.5 years of US experience performed the evaluations. Sciatic nerves were sampled along the posterior thigh at four sites obtaining CSA, SWE, and algometry. All three hamstring muscles were sampled at two sites utilizing SWE and algometry. Descriptive statistics, two-way ANOVA, and rater reliability were assessed for data analysis with p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: A significant decrease in sciatic CSA from proximal to distal was correlated with increasing BMI (p < 0.001). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for CSA was moderate and poor, respectively. Elastographic values significantly increased from proximal to distal with significant differences in gender and BMI (p = 0.002). Sciatic PPT significantly decreased between sites 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 1 and 4. Significant correlation between gender and PPT was noted as well as BMI (p < 0.001). Hamstring muscle elastographic values significantly differed between biceps femoris and semitendinosus (p < 0.001) and biceps femoris and semimembranosus (p < 0.001). All three hamstring muscles demonstrated increased PPT in males compared to females (p < 0.001). In addition, PPT of the biceps femoris correlated with BMI (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: High-resolution US provided useful metrics of sciatic nerve size and biomechanical properties. PPT for the normal sciatic nerve and hamstring muscles was obtained for future clinical application.
PURPOSE: The sciatic nerve innervates the hamstring muscles. Occasionally, the sciatic nerve is injured along with a hamstring muscle. Detailed biomechanical and sensory thresholds of these structures are not well-characterized. Therefore, we designed a prospective study that explored high-resolution ultrasound (US) at multiple sites to evaluate properties of the sciatic nerve, including cross-sectional area (CSA) and shear-wave elastography (SWE). We also assessed SWE of each hamstring muscle at multiple sites. Mechanical algometry was obtained from the sciatic nerve and hamstring muscles to assess multi-site pressure pain threshold (PPT). METHODS: Seventy-nine asymptomatic sciatic nerves and 147 hamstring muscles (25 males, 24 females) aged 18-50 years were evaluated. One chiropractic radiologist with 4.5 years of US experience performed the evaluations. Sciatic nerves were sampled along the posterior thigh at four sites obtaining CSA, SWE, and algometry. All three hamstring muscles were sampled at two sites utilizing SWE and algometry. Descriptive statistics, two-way ANOVA, and rater reliability were assessed for data analysis with p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: A significant decrease in sciatic CSA from proximal to distal was correlated with increasing BMI (p < 0.001). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for CSA was moderate and poor, respectively. Elastographic values significantly increased from proximal to distal with significant differences in gender and BMI (p = 0.002). Sciatic PPT significantly decreased between sites 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 1 and 4. Significant correlation between gender and PPT was noted as well as BMI (p < 0.001). Hamstring muscle elastographic values significantly differed between biceps femoris and semitendinosus (p < 0.001) and biceps femoris and semimembranosus (p < 0.001). All three hamstring muscles demonstrated increased PPT in males compared to females (p < 0.001). In addition, PPT of the biceps femoris correlated with BMI (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: High-resolution US provided useful metrics of sciatic nerve size and biomechanical properties. PPT for the normal sciatic nerve and hamstring muscles was obtained for future clinical application.
Authors: Noel Pollock; Anish Patel; Julian Chakraverty; Anu Suokas; Stephen L J James; Robin Chakraverty Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Tiago Neto; Sandro R Freitas; Ricardo J Andrade; João R Vaz; Bruno Mendes; Telmo Firmino; Paula M Bruno; Antoine Nordez; Raúl Oliveira Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2018-05-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Arnlaug Wangensteen; Johannes L Tol; Erik Witvrouw; Robbart Van Linschoten; Emad Almusa; Bruce Hamilton; Roald Bahr Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Michel D Crema; Mohamed Jarraya; Lars Engebretsen; Frank W Roemer; Daichi Hayashi; Romulo Domingues; Abdalla Y Skaf; Ali Guermazi Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Ricardo J Andrade; Antoine Nordez; François Hug; Filiz Ates; Michel W Coppieters; Pedro Pezarat-Correia; Sandro R Freitas Journal: J Biomech Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.712