Andreea I Heriseanu1,2, Phillipa Hay3,4, Stephen Touyz5,6. 1. eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia. andreea.heriseanu@mq.edu.au. 2. Clinical Psychology Unit, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Level 3 M02F, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. andreea.heriseanu@mq.edu.au. 3. Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. 4. Campbelltown Hospital, South West Sydney Local Health District (SWSLHD), PO Box 149, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia. 5. Clinical Psychology Unit, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Level 3 M02F, 94 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. 6. InsideOut Institute, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Johns Hopkins Drive, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The current study aimed to investigate associations between grazing and different facets of executive functioning in persons with obesity with and without significant eating disorder psychopathology, compared to a healthy-weight control group. METHODS: Eighty-nine participants (of which 20 had obesity and marked eating disorder symptomatology, 25 had obesity but without marked eating disorder symptoms, and 44 were healthy-weight age- and sex-matched participants; N = 89; 66.3% female, age = 28.59 (8.62); 18.18-58.34 years) completed a battery of neuropsychological tests and demographic and eating disorder-related questionnaires. Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Ordinary Least Squares regressions were performed to examine group differences and the associations of grazing with executive functioning within the three groups. RESULTS: Significantly lower inhibitory control and phonemic fluency were observed for the obesity group without ED features compared to healthy-weight controls. Increasing grazing severity was associated with improved performance in inhibitory control in both groups with obesity, and with phonemic fluency in the obesity group with marked eating disorder features. CONCLUSION: Although there is mounting evidence that specific cognitive domains, especially inhibition, are affected in obesity, evidence of further detrimental effects of eating disorder psychopathology remains mixed; additionally, for persons with obesity, there may be a weak but positive link between executive functioning and grazing behaviour. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative cross-sectional observational study with a concurrent control group.
PURPOSE: The current study aimed to investigate associations between grazing and different facets of executive functioning in persons with obesity with and without significant eating disorder psychopathology, compared to a healthy-weight control group. METHODS: Eighty-nine participants (of which 20 had obesity and marked eating disorder symptomatology, 25 had obesity but without marked eating disorder symptoms, and 44 were healthy-weight age- and sex-matched participants; N = 89; 66.3% female, age = 28.59 (8.62); 18.18-58.34 years) completed a battery of neuropsychological tests and demographic and eating disorder-related questionnaires. Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Ordinary Least Squares regressions were performed to examine group differences and the associations of grazing with executive functioning within the three groups. RESULTS: Significantly lower inhibitory control and phonemic fluency were observed for the obesity group without ED features compared to healthy-weight controls. Increasing grazing severity was associated with improved performance in inhibitory control in both groups with obesity, and with phonemic fluency in the obesity group with marked eating disorder features. CONCLUSION: Although there is mounting evidence that specific cognitive domains, especially inhibition, are affected in obesity, evidence of further detrimental effects of eating disorder psychopathology remains mixed; additionally, for persons with obesity, there may be a weak but positive link between executive functioning and grazing behaviour. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative cross-sectional observational study with a concurrent control group.
Authors: Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Joanna S Fowler; Panayotis K Thanos; Jean Logan; David Alexoff; Yu-Shin Ding; Christopher Wong; Yeming Ma; Kith Pradhan Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 6.556