Literature DB >> 33515085

Top-down task-specific determinants of multisensory motor reaction time enhancements and sensory switch costs.

Ayla Barutchu1, Charles Spence2.   

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the complex interplay between multisensory processing, top-down processes related to the task relevance of sensory signals, and sensory switching. Thirty-five adults completed either a speeded detection or a discrimination task using the same auditory and visual stimuli and experimental setup. The stimuli consisted of unisensory and multisensory presentations of the letters 'b' and 'd'. The multisensory stimuli were either congruent (e.g., the grapheme 'b' with the phoneme /b/) or incongruent (e.g., the grapheme 'b' with the phoneme /d/). In the detection task, the participants had to respond to all of the stimuli as rapidly as possible while, in the discrimination task, they only responded on those trials where one prespecified letter (either 'b' or 'd') was present. Incongruent multisensory stimuli resulted in faster responses as compared to unisensory stimuli in the detection task. In the discrimination task, only the dual-target congruent stimuli resulted in faster RTs, while the incongruent multisensory stimuli led to slower RTs than to unisensory stimuli; RTs were the slowest when the visual (rather than the auditory) signal was irrelevant, thus suggesting visual dominance. Switch costs were also observed when switching between unisensory target stimuli, while dual-target multisensory stimuli were less likely to be affected by sensory switching. Taken together, these findings suggest that multisensory motor enhancements and sensory switch costs are influenced by top-down modulations determined by task instructions, which can override the influence of prior learnt associations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audition; Modality-switch effect (MSE); Multisensory; Switch cost; Top–down; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33515085      PMCID: PMC7943519          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-06014-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy.

Authors:  L E Bahrick; R Lickliter
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Top-down task effects overrule automatic multisensory responses to letter-sound pairs in auditory association cortex.

Authors:  Nienke M van Atteveldt; Elia Formisano; Rainer Goebel; Leo Blomert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Task coordination between and within sensory modalities: effects on distraction.

Authors:  Muriele Brand-D'Abrescia; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-04

5.  Eyes wide shut: implied social presence, eye tracking and attention.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.

Authors:  Magali Kreutzfeldt; Denise N Stephan; Walter Sturm; Klaus Willmes; Iring Koch
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2015-01-08

7.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The impact of semantically congruent and incongruent visual information on auditory object recognition across development.

Authors:  Rhiannon L Thomas; Marko Nardini; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-06-06

9.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.

Authors:  C Spence; M E Nicholls; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

10.  Verbal and novel multisensory associative learning in adults.

Authors:  Joanne M Fifer; Ayla Barutchu; Mohit N Shivdasani; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-02-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Multisensory stimuli shift perceptual priors to facilitate rapid behavior.

Authors:  John Plass; David Brang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.

Authors:  Clea Desebrock; Charles Spence; Ayla Barutchu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.