Literature DB >> 33514627

Self-Collected Saline Gargle Samples as an Alternative to Health Care Worker-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Outpatients.

David M Goldfarb1,2, Peter Tilley3,2, Ghada N Al-Rawahi3,2, Jocelyn A Srigley3,2, Geoffrey Ford4, Heather Pedersen4, Abhilasha Pabbi5, Stephanie Hannam-Clark5, Marthe Charles3,6, Michelle Dittrick3, Vijay J Gadkar3,2, Jeffrey M Pernica7, Linda M N Hoang3,8.   

Abstract

We assessed the performance, stability, and user acceptability of swab-independent self-collected saliva and saline mouth rinse/gargle sample types for the molecular detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in adults and school-aged children. Outpatients who had recently been diagnosed with COVID-19 or were presenting with suspected COVID-19 were asked to have a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab collected and provide at least one self-collected sample type. Participants were also asked about sample acceptability using a five-point Likert scale. For those previously diagnosed with COVID-19, all samples underwent real-time PCR testing using a lab-developed assay, and the majority were also tested using an FDA-authorized assay. For those presenting with suspected COVID-19, only those with a positive nasopharyngeal swab sample went on to have other samples tested. Saline mouth rinse/gargle and saliva samples were tested daily at time zero, day 1, and day 2 to assess nucleic acid stability at room temperature. Fifty participants (aged 4 to 71 years) were included; of these, 40 had at least one positive sample and were included in the primary sample yield analysis. Saline mouth rinse/gargle samples had a sensitivity of 98% (39/40), while saliva samples had a sensitivity of 79% (26/33). Both saline mouth rinse/gargle and saliva samples showed stable viral RNA detection after 2 days of room temperature storage. Mouth rinse/gargle samples had the highest (mean, 4.9) and health care worker (HCW)-collected NP swabs had the lowest acceptability scores (mean, 3.1). In conclusion, saline mouth rinse/gargle samples demonstrated higher combined user acceptability ratings and analytical performance than saliva and HCW-collected NP swabs. This sample type is a promising swab-independent option, particularly for outpatient self-collection in adults and school-aged children.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; PCR; SARS-CoV-2; gargle; saliva

Year:  2021        PMID: 33514627     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02427-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  34 in total

Review 1.  Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Severino Jefferson Ribeiro da Silva; Jessica Catarine Frutuoso do Nascimento; Renata Pessôa Germano Mendes; Klarissa Miranda Guarines; Caroline Targino Alves da Silva; Poliana Gomes da Silva; Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de Magalhães; Justin R J Vigar; Abelardo Silva-Júnior; Alain Kohl; Keith Pardee; Lindomar Pena
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Prevalence of RT-qPCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection at schools: First results from the Austrian School-SARS-CoV-2 prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Willeit; Robert Krause; Bernd Lamprecht; Andrea Berghold; Buck Hanson; Evelyn Stelzl; Heribert Stoiber; Johannes Zuber; Robert Heinen; Alwin Köhler; David Bernhard; Wegene Borena; Christian Doppler; Dorothee von Laer; Hannes Schmidt; Johannes Pröll; Ivo Steinmetz; Michael Wagner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Alexander Lawandi; Ian Schiller; Mandy Yao; Nandini Dendukuri; Emily G McDonald; Todd C Lee
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens.

Authors:  Matthew M Hernandez; Radhika Banu; Paras Shrestha; Armi Patel; Feng Chen; Liyong Cao; Shelcie Fabre; Jessica Tan; Heidi Lopez; Numthip Chiu; Biana Shifrin; Inessa Zapolskaya; Vanessa Flores; Pui Yiu Lee; Sergio Castañeda; Juan David Ramírez; Jeffrey Jhang; Giuliana Osorio; Melissa R Gitman; Michael D Nowak; David L Reich; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Emilia Mia Sordillo; Alberto E Paniz-Mondolfi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 20.693

5.  Comparison of saliva with oral and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection on various commercial and laboratory-developed assays.

Authors:  Annie-Claude Labbé; Patrick Benoit; Sarah Gobeille Paré; François Coutlée; Simon Lévesque; Julie Bestman-Smith; Jeannot Dumaresq; Christian Lavallée; Claudia Houle; Philippe Martin; Anton Mak; Philippe Gervais; Stéphanie Langevin; Mariève Jacob-Wagner; Simon Gagnon; Manon St-Hilaire; Nathalie Lussier; Ariane Yechouron; David Roy; Michel Roger; Judith Fafard
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 6.  Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A scoping review.

Authors:  Yifei Wang; Akshaya Upadhyay; Sangeeth Pillai; Parisa Khayambashi; Simon D Tran
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.068

7.  Reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 with patient-collected swabs and saline gargles: A three-headed comparison on multiple molecular platforms.

Authors:  Jason J LeBlanc; Janice Pettipas; Melanie Di Quinzio; Todd F Hatchette; Glenn Patriquin
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 2.623

8.  High Efficacy of Saliva in Detecting SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Michael Huber; Peter Werner Schreiber; Thomas Scheier; Annette Audigé; Roberto Buonomano; Alain Rudiger; Dominique L Braun; Gerhard Eich; Dagmar I Keller; Barbara Hasse; Jürg Böni; Christoph Berger; Huldrych F Günthard; Amapola Manrique; Alexandra Trkola
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-03-19

9.  Comparison of Self-collected Mouth Gargle with Deep-throat Saliva Samples for the diagnosis of COVID-19: Mouth gargle for diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Christopher Kc Lai; Grace Cy Lui; Zigui Chen; Yuk-Yam Cheung; Kwok Chu Cheng; Agnes Sy Leung; Rita Wy Ng; Jo Lk Cheung; Apple Cm Yeung; Wendy Cs Ho; Kate C Chan; David Sc Hui; Dominic Nc Tsang; Paul Ks Chan
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 6.072

10.  The role of mouthwash sampling in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.

Authors:  Asaf Biber; Dana Lev; Michal Mandelboim; Yaniv Lustig; Geva Harmelin; Amit Shaham; Oran Erster; Eli Schwartz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.