Angela Mauro1,2, Nicola Improda3,4, Letizia Zenzeri3, Francesco Valitutti5,6, Erica Vecchione3, Sara Esposito4, Vincenzo Tipo3. 1. Emergency Pediatric Department, Pediatric Emergency Unit, AORN Santobono-Pausilipon Children's Hospital, Via Mario Fiore 6, 80131, Naples, Italy. angela.mauro84@gmail.com. 2. EBRIS (European Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno), Salerno, Italy. angela.mauro84@gmail.com. 3. Emergency Pediatric Department, Pediatric Emergency Unit, AORN Santobono-Pausilipon Children's Hospital, Via Mario Fiore 6, 80131, Naples, Italy. 4. Pediatric Section, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy. 5. EBRIS (European Biomedical Research Institute of Salerno), Salerno, Italy. 6. Pediatric Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic has markedly affected emergency care, due to sudden limitation of health care capacity by general practitioners (GP) and urgent need for infection control strategies. We evaluated the activity of the Emergency Department (ED) during the national lockdown (March 8-April 30), as well as the outcomes of our infection control strategy. RESULTS: Despite a reduction in access by one fifth, a proportion of febrile patients comparable to 2019 was seen (829/2492, 33.3% vs 4580/13.342, 34.3%, p = 0.3). Diagnostic swab for COVID-19 was performed in 25% of patients, especially in subjects with co-morbidities or multiple access. Six infected cases were identified, all presenting with febrile disease. Only two positive patients fulfilled the criteria for diagnostic swab provided by the Italian Health Authorities, because of close contact with suspected or confirmed cases. The rate of admission for febrile or respiratory conditions was higher than the same period of 2019 (33.4% vs 25.9%, p < 0.0001). None of the 105 health-care professionals working during the study time lapse exhibited anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion. Among the 589 patients with information available, 54.9% declared no medical consultation at all prior to coming to ED, while only 40 (of which 27 with fever) had been examined by their GP before coming to ED. Nevertheless, 35.6% of the cases were already taking medications. None of the 9 patients requiring intensive care reported recent pediatric consultation, despite symptoms duration up to 30 days. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that the reduced capacity of primary care facilities during the national lockdown may have caused a high rate of self-medication as well as a delayed provision of care in some patients. Identification of pediatric patients affected with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a challenge because of the absence of reliable predictive factors. Finally, the use of specific triage centers, with dedicated pathways to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection, trace contacts and allow adequate care after swabs, is effective in preventing spreading of the infection.
BACKGROUND:COVID-19 pandemic has markedly affected emergency care, due to sudden limitation of health care capacity by general practitioners (GP) and urgent need for infection control strategies. We evaluated the activity of the Emergency Department (ED) during the national lockdown (March 8-April 30), as well as the outcomes of our infection control strategy. RESULTS: Despite a reduction in access by one fifth, a proportion of febrile patients comparable to 2019 was seen (829/2492, 33.3% vs 4580/13.342, 34.3%, p = 0.3). Diagnostic swab for COVID-19 was performed in 25% of patients, especially in subjects with co-morbidities or multiple access. Six infected cases were identified, all presenting with febrile disease. Only two positive patients fulfilled the criteria for diagnostic swab provided by the Italian Health Authorities, because of close contact with suspected or confirmed cases. The rate of admission for febrile or respiratory conditions was higher than the same period of 2019 (33.4% vs 25.9%, p < 0.0001). None of the 105 health-care professionals working during the study time lapse exhibited anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion. Among the 589 patients with information available, 54.9% declared no medical consultation at all prior to coming to ED, while only 40 (of which 27 with fever) had been examined by their GP before coming to ED. Nevertheless, 35.6% of the cases were already taking medications. None of the 9 patients requiring intensive care reported recent pediatric consultation, despite symptoms duration up to 30 days. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that the reduced capacity of primary care facilities during the national lockdown may have caused a high rate of self-medication as well as a delayed provision of care in some patients. Identification of pediatric patients affected with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a challenge because of the absence of reliable predictive factors. Finally, the use of specific triage centers, with dedicated pathways to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection, trace contacts and allow adequate care after swabs, is effective in preventing spreading of the infection.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Emergency care; Infection control strategy; Triage
Authors: Lara S Shekerdemian; Nabihah R Mahmood; Katie K Wolfe; Becky J Riggs; Catherine E Ross; Christine A McKiernan; Sabrina M Heidemann; Lawrence C Kleinman; Anita I Sen; Mark W Hall; Margaret A Priestley; John K McGuire; Konstantinos Boukas; Matthew P Sharron; Jeffrey P Burns Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 16.193