Ling-Fung Yeung1, Cathy C Y Lau1, Charles W K Lai2, Yannie O Y Soo3, Man-Lok Chan4, Raymond K Y Tong5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. 2. Physiotherapy Department, Shatin Hospital, Ma On Shan, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong. 4. Physiotherapy Department, Tung Wah Hospital, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. kytong@cuhk.edu.hk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wearable ankle robotics could potentially facilitate intensive repetitive task-specific gait training on stair environment for stroke rehabilitation. A lightweight (0.5 kg) and portable exoskeleton ankle robot was designed to facilitate over-ground and stair training either providing active assistance to move paretic ankle augmenting residual motor function (power-assisted ankle robot, PAAR), or passively support dropped foot by lock/release ankle joint for foot clearance in swing phase (swing-controlled ankle robot, SCAR). In this two-center randomized controlled trial, we hypothesized that conventional training integrated with robot-assisted gait training using either PAAR or SCAR in stair environment are more effective to enhance gait recovery and promote independency in early stroke, than conventional training alone. METHODS:Sub-acute stroke survivors (within 2 months after stroke onset) received conventional training integrated with 20-session robot-assisted training (at least twice weekly, 30-min per session) on over-ground and stair environments, wearing PAAR (n = 14) or SCAR (n = 16), as compared to control group receiving conventional training only (CT, n = 17). Clinical assessments were performed before and after the 20-session intervention, including functional ambulatory category as primary outcome measure, along with Berg balance scale and timed 10-m walk test. RESULTS: After the 20-session interventions, all three groups showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful within-group functional improvement in all outcome measures (p < 0.005). Between-group comparison showed SCAR had greater improvement in functional ambulatory category (mean difference + 0.6, medium effect size 0.610) with more than 56% independent walkers after training, as compared to only 29% for CT. Analysis of covariance results showed PAAR had greater improvement in walking speed than SCAR (mean difference + 0.15 m/s, large effect size 0.752), which was in line with the higher cadence and speed when wearing the robot during the 20-session robot-assisted training over-ground and on stairs. CONCLUSIONS:Robot-assisted stair training would lead to greater functional improvement in gait independency and walking speed than conventional training in usual care. The active powered ankle assistance might facilitate users to walk more and faster with their paretic leg during stair and over-ground walking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03184259. Registered on 12 June 2017.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Wearable ankle robotics could potentially facilitate intensive repetitive task-specific gait training on stair environment for stroke rehabilitation. A lightweight (0.5 kg) and portable exoskeleton ankle robot was designed to facilitate over-ground and stair training either providing active assistance to move paretic ankle augmenting residual motor function (power-assisted ankle robot, PAAR), or passively support dropped foot by lock/release ankle joint for foot clearance in swing phase (swing-controlled ankle robot, SCAR). In this two-center randomized controlled trial, we hypothesized that conventional training integrated with robot-assisted gait training using either PAAR or SCAR in stair environment are more effective to enhance gait recovery and promote independency in early stroke, than conventional training alone. METHODS:Sub-acute stroke survivors (within 2 months after stroke onset) received conventional training integrated with 20-session robot-assisted training (at least twice weekly, 30-min per session) on over-ground and stair environments, wearing PAAR (n = 14) or SCAR (n = 16), as compared to control group receiving conventional training only (CT, n = 17). Clinical assessments were performed before and after the 20-session intervention, including functional ambulatory category as primary outcome measure, along with Berg balance scale and timed 10-m walk test. RESULTS: After the 20-session interventions, all three groups showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful within-group functional improvement in all outcome measures (p < 0.005). Between-group comparison showed SCAR had greater improvement in functional ambulatory category (mean difference + 0.6, medium effect size 0.610) with more than 56% independent walkers after training, as compared to only 29% for CT. Analysis of covariance results showed PAAR had greater improvement in walking speed than SCAR (mean difference + 0.15 m/s, large effect size 0.752), which was in line with the higher cadence and speed when wearing the robot during the 20-session robot-assisted training over-ground and on stairs. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted stair training would lead to greater functional improvement in gait independency and walking speed than conventional training in usual care. The active powered ankle assistance might facilitate users to walk more and faster with their paretic leg during stair and over-ground walking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03184259. Registered on 12 June 2017.
Authors: Jennifer L Moore; Jan E Nordvik; Anne Erichsen; Ingvild Rosseland; Elisabeth Bø; T George Hornby Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jan Mehrholz; Simone Thomas; Cordula Werner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Bernhard Elsner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-05-10
Authors: Ji-Eun Cho; Jun Sang Yoo; Kyoung Eun Kim; Sung Tae Cho; Woo Seok Jang; Ki Hun Cho; Wan-Hee Lee Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Marios Spanakis; Ioanna Xylouri; Evridiki Patelarou; Athina Patelarou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 4.614