Peter van der Graaf1, Mandy Cheetham2, Sam Redgate3, Clare Humble3,4, Ashley Adamson3. 1. Department of Applied Health Professionals, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK. p.van.der.graaf@tees.ac.uk. 2. Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 3. Faculty of Medical Sciences, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 4. Newcastle City Council, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Co-production of research evidence is valued by local government to improve effective decision-making about public services in times of austerity. However, underlying structural issues of power (so-called 'dark shadows of co-production') challenge this ambition with limited evidence on how to embed research use sustainably. In this paper we reflect on mechanisms for increasing co-production in local government. METHODS: This paper presents findings from a Health Foundation funded research project that explored how a culture of evidence use to improve population health could be embedded in UK local government. Five linked work packages were undertaken using mixed methods. In this paper, we report the views of UK local authority staff who participated in four workshops (n = 54), informed by a rapid literature review and an online scoping survey. RESULTS: We identified five themes that facilitate public health evidence use in local government: (1) new governance arrangements to integrate national and local policies, (2) codifying research evidence through local system-wide approaches and (3) ongoing evaluation of programmes, and (4) overcoming political and cultural barriers by increasing absorptive capacity of Local Authorities to embed co-produced knowledge in their cognitive structures. This requires adaptive governance through relationship building between academic researchers and Local Authority staff and shared understanding of fragmented local policy making, which are supported by (5) collective spaces for reflection within local government. CONCLUSIONS: Creating collective spaces for reflection in between government departments allows for iterative, interactive processes of co-production with external partners that support emergence of new governance structures to socially action the co-produced knowledge in context and build capacity for sustained evidence use.
BACKGROUND: Co-production of research evidence is valued by local government to improve effective decision-making about public services in times of austerity. However, underlying structural issues of power (so-called 'dark shadows of co-production') challenge this ambition with limited evidence on how to embed research use sustainably. In this paper we reflect on mechanisms for increasing co-production in local government. METHODS: This paper presents findings from a Health Foundation funded research project that explored how a culture of evidence use to improve population health could be embedded in UK local government. Five linked work packages were undertaken using mixed methods. In this paper, we report the views of UK local authority staff who participated in four workshops (n = 54), informed by a rapid literature review and an online scoping survey. RESULTS: We identified five themes that facilitate public health evidence use in local government: (1) new governance arrangements to integrate national and local policies, (2) codifying research evidence through local system-wide approaches and (3) ongoing evaluation of programmes, and (4) overcoming political and cultural barriers by increasing absorptive capacity of Local Authorities to embed co-produced knowledge in their cognitive structures. This requires adaptive governance through relationship building between academic researchers and Local Authority staff and shared understanding of fragmented local policy making, which are supported by (5) collective spaces for reflection within local government. CONCLUSIONS: Creating collective spaces for reflection in between government departments allows for iterative, interactive processes of co-production with external partners that support emergence of new governance structures to socially action the co-produced knowledge in context and build capacity for sustained evidence use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Co-production; Embedded research; Knowledge brokering; Public health; Translational research
Authors: Martin Marshall; Laura Eyre; Mirza Lalani; Salmaan Khan; Susan Mann; Debi de Silva; Jonathan Shapiro Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: M Cheetham; A Wiseman; B Khazaeli; E Gibson; P Gray; P Van der Graaf; R Rushmer Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Oli Williams; Sophie Sarre; Stan Constantina Papoulias; Sarah Knowles; Glenn Robert; Peter Beresford; Diana Rose; Sarah Carr; Meerat Kaur; Victoria J Palmer Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Sarah Bowen; Ingrid Botting; Ian D Graham; Martha MacLeod; Danielle de Moissac; Karen Harlos; Bernard Leduc; Catherine Ulrich; Janet Knox Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2019-12-01
Authors: David Ogilvie; Peter Craig; Simon Griffin; Sally Macintyre; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Martin Marshall; Christina Pagel; Catherine French; Martin Utley; Dominique Allwood; Naomi Fulop; Catherine Pope; Victoria Banks; Allan Goldmann Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Catherine Homer; James Woodall; Charlotte Freeman; Jane South; Jo Cooke; Judith Holliday; Anna Hartley; Shane Mullen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.135