Tolu O Oyesanya1, Callan Loflin2, Lindsey Byom3, Gabrielle Harris2, Kaitlyn Daly2, Lesley Rink2, Janet Prvu Bettger2,4. 1. Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Dr., Durham, NC, 27710, USA. tolu.oyesanya@duke.edu. 2. Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Dr., Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 3. Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 4. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although transitional care interventions can improve health among patients hospitalized with acute conditions, few interventions use patient quality of life (QOL) as the primary outcome. Existing interventions use a variety of intervention components, are not effective for patients of all races and ethnicities, do not address age-related patient needs, and do not incorporate the needs of families. The purpose of this study was to systematically review characteristics of transitional care intervention studies that aimed to improve QOL for younger adult patients of all race and ethnicities who were hospitalized with acute conditions. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of empirical literature available in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO by November 19, 2019 to identify studies of hospital to home care transitions with QOL as the primary outcome. Data extraction on study design and intervention components was limited to studies of patients aged 18-64. RESULTS: Nineteen articles comprising 17 studies met inclusion criteria. There were a total of 3,122 patients across all studies (range: 28-536). Populations of focus included cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, breast cancer, and kidney disease. Seven QOL instruments were identified. All interventions were multi-component with a total of 31 different strategies used. Most interventions were facilitated by a registered nurse. Seven studies discussed intervention facilitator training and eight discussed intervention materials utilized. No studies specified cultural tailoring of interventions or analyzed findings by racial/ethnic subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to determine which intervention components, either in isolation or in combination, are effective in improving QOL. Future studies should also elaborate on the background and training of intervention facilitators and on materials utilized and may also consider incorporating differences in culture, race and ethnicity into all phases of the research process in an effort to address and reduce any health disparities.
BACKGROUND: Although transitional care interventions can improve health among patients hospitalized with acute conditions, few interventions use patient quality of life (QOL) as the primary outcome. Existing interventions use a variety of intervention components, are not effective for patients of all races and ethnicities, do not address age-related patient needs, and do not incorporate the needs of families. The purpose of this study was to systematically review characteristics of transitional care intervention studies that aimed to improve QOL for younger adult patients of all race and ethnicities who were hospitalized with acute conditions. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of empirical literature available in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO by November 19, 2019 to identify studies of hospital to home care transitions with QOL as the primary outcome. Data extraction on study design and intervention components was limited to studies of patients aged 18-64. RESULTS: Nineteen articles comprising 17 studies met inclusion criteria. There were a total of 3,122 patients across all studies (range: 28-536). Populations of focus included cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, breast cancer, and kidney disease. Seven QOL instruments were identified. All interventions were multi-component with a total of 31 different strategies used. Most interventions were facilitated by a registered nurse. Seven studies discussed intervention facilitator training and eight discussed intervention materials utilized. No studies specified cultural tailoring of interventions or analyzed findings by racial/ethnic subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to determine which intervention components, either in isolation or in combination, are effective in improving QOL. Future studies should also elaborate on the background and training of intervention facilitators and on materials utilized and may also consider incorporating differences in culture, race and ethnicity into all phases of the research process in an effort to address and reduce any health disparities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient care; Quality of life; Transitional care
Authors: Andrew Weintraub; Douglas Gregory; Ayan R Patel; Daniel Levine; David Venesy; Kathleen Perry; Christine Delano; Marvin A Konstam Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2010-02-07 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Cynthia Feltner; Christine D Jones; Crystal W Cené; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Carla A Sueta; Emmanuel J L Coker-Schwimmer; Marina Arvanitis; Kathleen N Lohr; Jennifer C Middleton; Daniel E Jonas Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Elizabeth C Shaid; Deborah Carpenter; Brianna Gass; Carol Levine; Jing Li; Ann Malley; Kathleen McCauley; Huong Q Nguyen; Heather Watson; Jane Brock; Brian Mittman; Brian Jack; Suzanne Mitchell; Becky Callicoatte; John Schall; Mark V Williams Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Hanan Aboumatar; Mohammad Naqibuddin; Suna Chung; Hina Chaudhry; Samuel W Kim; Jamia Saunders; Lee Bone; Ayse P Gurses; Amy Knowlton; Peter Pronovost; Nirupama Putcha; Cynthia Rand; Debra Roter; Carol Sylvester; Carol Thompson; Jennifer L Wolff; Judith Hibbard; Robert A Wise Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Pamela W Duncan; Cheryl D Bushnell; Wayne D Rosamond; Sara B Jones Berkeley; Sabina B Gesell; Ralph B D'Agostino; Walter T Ambrosius; Blair Barton-Percival; Janet Prvu Bettger; Sylvia W Coleman; Doyle M Cummings; Janet K Freburger; Jacqueline Halladay; Anna M Johnson; Anna M Kucharska-Newton; Gladys Lundy-Lamm; Barbara J Lutz; Laurie H Mettam; Amy M Pastva; Mysha E Sissine; Betsy Vetter Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 2.474