Literature DB >> 33513846

Conventional, High-Resolution and Imaging Flow Cytometry: Benchmarking Performance in Characterisation of Extracellular Vesicles.

Jaco Botha1,2, Haley R Pugsley3, Aase Handberg1,2.   

Abstract

Flow cytometry remains a commonly used methodology due to its ability to characterise multiple parameters on single particles in a high-throughput manner. In order to address limitations with lacking sensitivity of conventional flow cytometry to characterise extracellular vesicles (EVs), novel, highly sensitive platforms, such as high-resolution and imaging flow cytometers, have been developed. We provided comparative benchmarks of a conventional FACS Aria III, a high-resolution Apogee A60 Micro-PLUS and the ImageStream X Mk II imaging flow cytometry platform. Nanospheres were used to systematically characterise the abilities of each platform to detect and quantify populations with different sizes, refractive indices and fluorescence properties, and the repeatability in concentration determinations was reported for each population. We evaluated the ability of the three platforms to detect different EV phenotypes in blood plasma and the intra-day, inter-day and global variabilities in determining EV concentrations. By applying this or similar methodology to characterise methods, researchers would be able to make informed decisions on choice of platforms and thereby be able to match suitable flow cytometry platforms with projects based on the needs of each individual project. This would greatly contribute to improving the robustness and reproducibility of EV studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exosomes; extracellular vesicles; flow cytometry; high-resolution flow cytometry; imaging flow cytometry; microvesicles; repeatability; reproducibility; standardisation; submicron particle analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33513846     DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomedicines        ISSN: 2227-9059


  5 in total

1.  Neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and extracellular vesicle responses during the Navy Special Warfare Screener Selection Course.

Authors:  Meaghan E Beckner; William R Conkright; Qi Mi; Brian Martin; Amrita Sahu; Shawn D Flanagan; Andrew K Ledford; Martin Wright; Adam Susmarski; Fabrisia Ambrosio; Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 2.  Microparticles in Autoimmunity: Cause or Consequence of Disease?

Authors:  Nils Rother; Cansu Yanginlar; Elmar Pieterse; Luuk Hilbrands; Johan van der Vlag
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  Circulating cell-specific extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Lauren A Newman; Kate Muller; Andrew Rowland
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Lipid-based strategies used to identify extracellular vesicles in flow cytometry can be confounded by lipoproteins: Evaluations of annexin V, lactadherin, and detergent lysis.

Authors:  Jaco Botha; Aase Handberg; Jens B Simonsen
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2022-04

Review 5.  Challenges in the Development of Drug Delivery Systems Based on Small Extracellular Vesicles for Therapy of Brain Diseases.

Authors:  Gecioni Loch-Neckel; Ana Teresa Matos; Ana Rita Vaz; Dora Brites
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.