Literature DB >> 33513170

Accurate prediction of clinical stroke scales and improved biomarkers of motor impairment from robotic measurements.

Dimitris K Agrafiotis1,2, Eric Yang1,2, Gary S Littman3, Geert Byttebier4, Laura Dipietro5, Allitia DiBernardo1, Juan C Chavez6, Avrielle Rykman7, Kate McArthur8, Karim Hajjar8,9, Kennedy R Lees8, Bruce T Volpe10, Michael Krams1, Hermano I Krebs5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One of the greatest challenges in clinical trial design is dealing with the subjectivity and variability introduced by human raters when measuring clinical end-points. We hypothesized that robotic measures that capture the kinematics of human movements collected longitudinally in patients after stroke would bear a significant relationship to the ordinal clinical scales and potentially lead to the development of more sensitive motor biomarkers that could improve the efficiency and cost of clinical trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used clinical scales and a robotic assay to measure arm movement in 208 patients 7, 14, 21, 30 and 90 days after acute ischemic stroke at two separate clinical sites. The robots are low impedance and low friction interactive devices that precisely measure speed, position and force, so that even a hemiparetic patient can generate a complete measurement profile. These profiles were used to develop predictive models of the clinical assessments employing a combination of artificial ant colonies and neural network ensembles.
RESULTS: The resulting models replicated commonly used clinical scales to a cross-validated R2 of 0.73, 0.75, 0.63 and 0.60 for the Fugl-Meyer, Motor Power, NIH stroke and modified Rankin scales, respectively. Moreover, when suitably scaled and combined, the robotic measures demonstrated a significant increase in effect size from day 7 to 90 over historical data (1.47 versus 0.67). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that it is possible to derive surrogate biomarkers that can significantly reduce the sample size required to power future stroke clinical trials.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33513170      PMCID: PMC7845999          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  39 in total

1.  The use of overlapping submovements in the control of rapid hand movements.

Authors:  K E Novak; L E Miller; J C Houk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Seven-day NIHSS is a sensitive outcome measure for exploratory clinical trials in acute stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive.

Authors:  Daniel M Kerr; Rachael L Fulton; Kennedy R Lees
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients.

Authors:  J M Gregson; M J Leathley; A P Moore; T L Smith; A K Sharma; C L Watkins
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 4.  Physically interactive robotic technology for neuromotor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  M Ferraro; J J Palazzolo; J Krol; H I Krebs; N Hogan; B T Volpe
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke.

Authors:  L Dipietro; H I Krebs; S E Fasoli; B T Volpe; J Stein; C Bever; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A data-driven framework for selecting and validating digital health metrics: use-case in neurological sensorimotor impairments.

Authors:  Christoph M Kanzler; Mike D Rinderknecht; Anne Schwarz; Ilse Lamers; Cynthia Gagnon; Jeremia P O Held; Peter Feys; Andreas R Luft; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-29

9.  Kinematic Parameters for Tracking Patient Progress during Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study on Subacute Stroke Subjects.

Authors:  Michela Goffredo; Stefano Mazzoleni; Annalisa Gison; Francesco Infarinato; Sanaz Pournajaf; Daniele Galafate; Maurizio Agosti; Federico Posteraro; Marco Franceschini
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 10.  Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective.

Authors:  Roger Gassert; Volker Dietz
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Robotic Kinematic measures of the arm in chronic Stroke: part 1 - Motor Recovery patterns from tDCS preceding intensive training.

Authors:  Caio B Moretti; Dylan J Edwards; Taya Hamilton; Mar Cortes; Avrielle Rykman Peltz; Johanna L Chang; Alexandre C B Delbem; Bruce T Volpe; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2021-12-29

2.  Retrospective Robot-Measured Upper Limb Kinematic Data From Stroke Patients Are Novel Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michela Goffredo; Sanaz Pournajaf; Stefania Proietti; Annalisa Gison; Federico Posteraro; Marco Franceschini
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Robotic Kinematic measures of the arm in chronic Stroke: part 2 - strong correlation with clinical outcome measures.

Authors:  Caio B Moretti; Taya Hamilton; Dylan J Edwards; Avrielle Rykman Peltz; Johanna L Chang; Mar Cortes; Alexandre C B Delbe; Bruce T Volpe; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2021-12-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.