| Literature DB >> 33512809 |
Shin-Ei Kudo1, Yuta Kouyama1,2, Yushi Ogawa1,2, Katsuro Ichimasa1, Tsuyoshi Hamada3, Kazuki Kato1,2, Koki Kudo1,2, Takaaki Masuda2, Hajime Otsu2, Masashi Misawa1, Yuichi Mori1, Toyoki Kudo1, Takemasa Hayashi1, Kunihiko Wakamura1, Hideyuki Miyachi1, Naruhiko Sawada1, Toshiro Sato4, Tatsuhiro Shibata5, Shigeharu Hamatani1,6, Tetsuo Nemoto7, Fumio Ishida1, Atsushi Niida6, Satoru Miyano8, Masanobu Oshima9, Shuji Ogino10,11,12,13, Koshi Mimori2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In contrast to most colorectal carcinomas arising from pedunculated or sessile protruded adenomas, submucosal-invasive (pT1) colorectal carcinoma exhibiting a depressed surface (hereinafter, "depressed colorectal carcinoma," identified by means of high-definition endoscopy) is considered to be derived from depressed precursors. We hypothesized that depressed colorectal neoplasms have unique clinicopathological features different that are different from those of protruded and flat colorectal neoplasms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33512809 PMCID: PMC7732270 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol ISSN: 2155-384X Impact factor: 4.396
Figure 1.Pathological characteristics of colorectal neoplasms according to tumor size and morphological subtypes. Pathological diagnoses of colorectal neoplasms according to the tumor size in each morphological subtype. Frequencies of pT1 carcinomas were compared between depressed and other types in each stratum of the tumor size. Values for P were based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparisons of rates of pT1 carcinomas between depressed and other subtypes. SSA/P, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp.
Clinicopathological characteristics of pT1 colorectal carcinomas, overall and by morphological type
| Characteristic[ | Total (n = 909) | Morphological type | |||
| Depressed (n = 211) | Flat (n = 304) | Protruded (n = 394) | |||
| Age, yr | 68 (59–75) | 68 (60–75) | 69 (62–76) | 66 (57–73) | 0.49 |
| Sex | 0.14 | ||||
| Female | 332 (37) | 68 (32) | 114 (38) | 150 (38) | |
| Male | 577 (64) | 143 (68) | 190 (62) | 244 (62) | |
| Tumor size, mm | 19 (13–25) | 14 (10–18) | 25 (18–35) | 18 (13–23) | <0.001 |
| Tumor location | |||||
| Proximal colon | 282 (31) | 71 (34) | 147 (48) | 64 (16) | |
| Distal colon | 463 (51) | 93 (44) | 100 (33) | 270 (69) | |
| Rectum | 164 (18) | 47 (22) | 57 (19) | 60 (15) | |
| Histological grade | 0.18 | ||||
| Well or moderately differentiated | 777 (85) | 174 (82) | 268 (88) | 335 (85) | |
| Poorly differentiated or mucinous | 132 (15) | 37 (18) | 36 (12) | 59 (15) | |
| Adenoma component | <0.001 | ||||
| Absent | 522 (57) | 196 (93) | 145 (48) | 181 (45) | |
| Present | 387 (43) | 15 (7.1) | 159 (52) | 213 (54) | |
| SM depth | <0.001 | ||||
| <1000 μm | 217 (24) | 15 (7.1) | 111 (37) | 91 (23) | |
| ≥1000 μm | 692 (76) | 196 (93) | 193 (63) | 303 (77) | |
| Lymphatic invasion | <0.001 | ||||
| Absent | 621 (68) | 107 (51) | 234 (77) | 280 (71) | |
| Present | 288 (32) | 104 (49) | 70 (23) | 114 (29) | |
| Vascular invasion | <0.001 | ||||
| Absent | 672 (7) | 116 (55) | 241 (79) | 315 (80) | |
| Present | 237 (26) | 95 (45) | 63 (21) | 79 (20) | |
| Tumor budding[ | <0.001 | ||||
| Grade 1 | 708 (78) | 130 (62) | 253 (83) | 325 (83) | |
| Grade 2–3 | 201 (22) | 81 (38) | 51 (17) | 69 (18) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.08 | ||||
| Absent | 851 (94) | 194 (92) | 292 (96) | 365 (93) | |
| Present | 58 (6.4) | 17 (8.1) | 12 (4.3) | 29 (7.4) | |
| Recurrence or distant metastasis | 0.02 | ||||
| Absent | 898 (99) | 205 (97) | 301 (99) | 392 (99) | |
| Present | 11 (1.2) | 6 (2.8) | 3 (1.0) | 2 (0.5) | |
SM, submucosal.
Data are expressed as number of patients (%) or median (interquartile range).
To compare characteristics between subgroups, we used the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.
Numbers of isolated single cells or small clusters (<5 cells) in the stroma at the invasive tumor margin within a 20x microscopic field, and categorized as grades 1 (<5 budding foci), 2 (5–9), or 3 (≥10).
Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal adenomas, overall and by morphological type
| Characteristic[ | Total (n = 26,220) | Morphological type | |||
| Depressed (n = 109) | Flat (n = 11,246) | Protruded (n = 14,865) | |||
| Age, yr | 66 (57–73) | 65 (57–74) | 67 (59–74) | 65 (56–72) | 0.38 |
| Sex | 0.34 | ||||
| Female | 8,154 (31) | 32 (29) | 3,498 (31) | 4,801 (32) | |
| Male | 18,066 (69) | 77 (71) | 7,748 (69) | 10,064 (68) | |
| Tumor size, mm | 6 (4–10) | 5 (4–8) | 5 (3–10) | 6 (5–9) | 0.12 |
| Tumor location | <0.001 | ||||
| Proximal colon | 13,693 (52) | 34 (34) | 7,035 (63) | 6,624 (45) | |
| Distal colon | 10,404 (40) | 54 (44) | 3,626 (32) | 6,724 (45) | |
| Rectum | 2,123 (8.0) | 21 (19) | 585 (5.2) | 1,517 (10) | |
| Histological type | <0.001 | ||||
| Low-grade adenoma | 22,910 (87) | 56 (51) | 9,746 (87) | 13,081 (88) | |
| High-grade adenoma | 2,916 (11) | 53 (49) | 1,161 (10) | 1,729 (12) | |
| SSA/P | 394 (1.5) | 0 | 339 (3.0) | 55 (0.4) | |
SSA/P, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp.
Data are expressed as numbers of patients (%) or medians (interquartile range).
To compare characteristics between subgroups, we used the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.
Figure 2.Genetic alterations in depressed pT1 colorectal carcinomas compared with those in protruded carcinomas. (a) Somatic mutations in driver genes of colorectal cancer. (b) Copy number alterations. (c) Arm-level gene gain and loss in depressed and protruded types. SNV, single-nucleotide variant.
Figure 3.RNA sequencing of depressed pT1 colorectal carcinomas. (a) Gene set enrichment analysis. (b) Expression of genes that were most differentially expressed between depressed and protruded carcinomas. (c) ROC curves of RNA expression of angiogenesis, EMT, and inflammatory related genes. (d) Immunostaining for angiogenesis (PECAM1), EMT (VIM) and inflammatory response related gene (CD14). AUC, area under the ROC curve; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.