Literature DB >> 33512674

Underutilization of Needle Biopsy Before Breast Surgery: A Measure of Low-Value Care.

Richard C Gilmore1, Peiqi Wang1, Katerina Kaczmarski1, Susan Hutfless1, David M Euhus1, Lisa K Jacobs1, Mehran Habibi1, Julie Lange1, Melissa Camp1, Martin A Makary2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast core needle biopsy (CNB) can obviate the need for breast surgery in patients with an unknown breast lesion; however, variation in compliance with this guideline may represent a disparity in health care and a surrogate measure of unnecessary surgery. We evaluated variation in breast CNB rates prior to initial breast cancer surgery.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using Medicare claims from 2015 to 2017 to evaluate the proportion of patients who received a CNB within 6 months prior to initial breast cancer surgery. Outlier practice pattern was defined as a preoperative CNB rate ≤ 70%. Logistic regression was used to evaluate surgeon characteristics associated with outlier practice pattern.
RESULTS: We identified 108,935 female patients who underwent initial breast cancer surgery performed by 3229 surgeons from July 2015 to June 2017. The mean CNB rate was 86.7%. A total of 7.7% of surgeons had a CNB performed prior to initial breast surgery ≤ 70% of the time, and 2.0% had a CNB performed ≤ 50% of the time. Outlier breast surgeons were associated with practicing in a micropolitan area (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.73), in the South (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.20-2.84) or West region (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11-2.86), > 20 years in practice (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.11), and low breast cancer surgery volume (< 30 cases in the study period; OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.75-5.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Marked variation exists in whether a breast core biopsy is performed prior to initial breast surgery, which may represent unnecessary surgery on individual patients. Providing surgeon-specific feedback on guideline compliance may reduce unwarranted variation.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33512674     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09340-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Needle versus excisional biopsy for noninvasive and invasive breast cancer: report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2003-2008.

Authors:  Richelle T Williams; Katharine Yao; Andrew K Stewart; David J Winchester; Mary Turk; Addie Gorchow; Nora Jaskowiak; David P Winchester
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Improving breast cancer care through a regional quality collaborative.

Authors:  Tara M Breslin; Jamie Caughran; Jane Pettinga; Cheryl Wesen; Ann Mehringer; Huiying Yin; David Share; Samuel M Silver
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Michael D Lagios; Abram Recht; D Craig Allred; Steven E Harms; Roland Holland; Dennis R Holmes; Lorie L Hughes; Roger J Jackman; Thomas B Julian; Henry M Kuerer; Helen C Mabry; David R McCready; Kelly M McMasters; David L Page; Steve H Parker; Helen A Pass; Mark Pegram; Eva Rubin; A Thomas Stavros; Debasish Tripathy; Frank Vicini; Pat W Whitworth
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Physician Peer Comparisons as a Nonfinancial Strategy to Improve the Value of Care.

Authors:  Amol S Navathe; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Geographic variation and physician specialization in the use of percutaneous biopsy for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Claire M B Holloway; Refik Saskin; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.