Yutaka Iwagoi1, Takeshi Motohara2, Sangyoon Hwang1, Koichi Fujimoto3, Tokunori Ikeda4,5, Hidetaka Katabuchi1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. kan@kumamoto-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. 4. Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sojo University, 4-22-1, Ikeda, Nishi-ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-0082, Japan. 5. Department of Medical Information Sciences and Administration Planning, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer has a clear predilection for the omentum as the site of metastasis; however, its contribution to clinical outcomes remains unresolved. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance and efficacy of chemotherapy in the presence of omental metastasis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 56 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery between 2004 and 2018 at Kumamoto University Hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-six (64.3%) patients were categorized into the omental metastasis-positive group, whereas 20 (35.7%) patients were in the omental metastasis-negative group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 43.4% in the omental metastasis-positive group and 93.8% in the omental metastasis-negative group. Statistically significant differences were observed in overall survival (p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (p = 0.036) between the omental metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative groups. Notably, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the existence of omental metastasis is an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer (hazard ratio 8.90, 95% confidence interval 1.16-69.77; p = 0.038). Furthermore, the omental metastasis-positive group had significantly lower overall response rates to chemotherapy for recurrent disease, compared to the omental metastasis-negative group (31.6% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Our present data demonstrated that omental metastasis is closely associated with an unfavorable prognosis due to increased chemoresistance in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Elucidating the biological mechanism of omental metastasis will shed light on novel therapeutic approaches for the management of advanced ovarian cancer patients.
BACKGROUND:Epithelial ovarian cancer has a clear predilection for the omentum as the site of metastasis; however, its contribution to clinical outcomes remains unresolved. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance and efficacy of chemotherapy in the presence of omental metastasis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 56 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery between 2004 and 2018 at Kumamoto University Hospital. RESULTS: Thirty-six (64.3%) patients were categorized into the omental metastasis-positive group, whereas 20 (35.7%) patients were in the omental metastasis-negative group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 43.4% in the omental metastasis-positive group and 93.8% in the omental metastasis-negative group. Statistically significant differences were observed in overall survival (p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (p = 0.036) between the omental metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative groups. Notably, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the existence of omental metastasis is an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer (hazard ratio 8.90, 95% confidence interval 1.16-69.77; p = 0.038). Furthermore, the omental metastasis-positive group had significantly lower overall response rates to chemotherapy for recurrent disease, compared to the omental metastasis-negative group (31.6% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Our present data demonstrated that omental metastasis is closely associated with an unfavorable prognosis due to increased chemoresistance in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Elucidating the biological mechanism of omental metastasis will shed light on novel therapeutic approaches for the management of advanced ovarian cancerpatients.