Literature DB >> 33512618

Impact of the format of user instructions on the handling of a wrist blood pressure monitor.

Chaniaud Noémie1, Métayer Natacha2, Loup-Escande Emilie2, Megalakaki Olga2.   

Abstract

Few studies have focused on procedural documents in the field of home medical devices, although incorrect use and usability problems can have important consequences for the patient's health. In this study, we focused on the procedural learning of a home medical device, a blood pressure monitor. Five formats (unimodal: text, audio, pictures; and multimodal: text/audio with pictures) were tested on 124 novice participants randomly assigned to 5 groups. We judged the quality of the formats on the basis of three metrics: efficiency (i.e., handling errors), effectiveness (i.e., consultation time of the procedure, execution time of the devices) and memorability (i.e., recall task). Results suggest that the audio format was more effective than the other groups but also the least efficient. We consider the audio format to be beneficial for patient safety because this format would oblige participants to use a strategy suited to the situation, namely an atomization of the action corresponding to a segmentation of information less likely to saturate working memory. Results in relation to the other formats did not show a more effective, efficient and memorable format. This lack of difference in user performance is nevertheless important, illustrating the need to adapt each instruction to the context of learning, i.e., according to the users, the environment, the resources and the complexity of the task to be executed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home medical device; Instructions; Multimedia presentation; Procedural documents; eHealth

Year:  2021        PMID: 33512618     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-020-01006-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  10 in total

1.  Learning to use a home medical device: mediating age-related differences with training.

Authors:  Amy L Mykityshyn; Arthur D Fisk; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  The influence of age in usability testing.

Authors:  Andreas Sonderegger; Sven Schmutz; Juergen Sauer
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking.

Authors:  Wai-Tat Fu; Wayne D Gray
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Effects of labeling techniques on memory and comprehension of prescription information in young and old adults.

Authors:  R W Morrell; D C Park; L W Poon
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1990-07

Review 5.  Working memory.

Authors:  A Baddeley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Supervised automatic interpretation of technical documents: when interruption is a time saver.

Authors:  Sylvain Fleury; Eric Jamet
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2015-02-19

8.  Telling people how things work.

Authors:  K P Szlichcinski
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  An Educational Intervention to Train Professional Nurses in Promoting Patient Engagement: A Pilot Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Serena Barello; Guendalina Graffigna; Giuliana Pitacco; Maila Mislej; Maurizio Cortale; Livio Provenzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-10

10.  Evaluation of Home Health Care Devices: Remote Usability Assessment.

Authors:  Philip Kortum; S Camille Peres
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2015-06-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.