Literature DB >> 33512543

Long-term outcomes were similar between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees at a minimum 15 years of follow-up.

Sang Jun Song1, Jong Whan Lee1, Dae Kyung Bae2, Cheol Hee Park3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare long-term clinical and radiographic results and survival rates between hybrid and cemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed on paired knees.
METHODS: Seventy-two patients with hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees with NexGen® cruciate-retaining prostheses were retrospectively reviewed after a minimum 15 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 17.5 years. Preoperative alignment deformity and range of motion (ROM) were not different between groups. The Knee Society score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and ROM were evaluated. Radiographically, change in joint space width, component loosening, and osteolysis were evaluated. Implant survival rate was analyzed.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical results between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees of 72 patients at the last follow-up. No significant difference was observed in the change in joint space width between the two groups at the last follow-up (medial = 0.3 mm vs. 0.4 mm; lateral = 0.1 mm vs. 0.2 mm). One hybrid TKA showed tibial component loosening, for which revision was performed. There was femoral osteolysis in one hybrid and one cemented TKA, and tibial osteolysis in eight hybrid TKAs and seven cemented TKAs (n.s., respectively). The 20-year survival rate was 97.7% for hybrid TKAs and 100% for cemented TKAs (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes were similar between hybrid and cemented TKAs performed on paired knees at a minimum 15 years of follow-up. The method of femoral component fixation did not have a significant effect on long-term TKA success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2021. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Cemented; Hybrid; Knee; Long-term; Total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33512543     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06463-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Long-Term Survival Analysis Between Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Quan He Jin; Won-Gyun Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song; Cheng Jin; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Successful mid- to long-term outcome after reconstruction of the extensor apparatus using proximal tibia-patellar tendon composite allograft.

Authors:  Pablo Puerta-GarciaSandoval; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Maria A Trigueros-Rentero; Adolfo Perez-Aznar; Carolina Alonso-Montero; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Risk factors for predicting cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Yunpeng Cui; Yuanxing Pan; Yunfei Lin; Chuan Mi; Bing Wang; Xuedong Shi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 1.601

4.  Better survival of hybrid total knee arthroplasty compared to cemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gunnar Petursson; Anne Marie Fenstad; Leif Ivar Havelin; Øystein Gøthesen; Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre; Stephan M Röhrl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.