BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a thrombin-based hemostatic agent (Floseal®) on reducing postoperative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was still unclear. The aim of our study was to conduct a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the blood conservation effects of Floseal® and topical TXA in patients with preexisting thromboembolic risk undergoing primary minimally invasive TKA. METHODS: Our power analysis of this study was based upon the following description, to obtain a statistical power of 0.90 and an alpha error of 0.05, 30 patients were required in each group. Therefore, we enrolled a total of 103 patients with at least one of the risk factors for thromboembolism who underwent unilateral primary minimally invasive TKA, and the participants were randomly divided into the topical TXA group (n = 34), receiving intra-articular injection of 3 g of TXA in 100 mL saline after TKA, the topical Floseal® group (n = 34), receiving 10 mL of Floseal® intra-articularily during surgery, and the placebo group (n = 35), receiving an intra-articular saline injection only. The total blood loss (TBL) and hemoglobin (Hb) drop were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The TXA group had a lower TBL of 645 mL (227 to 1090) in comparison with 1145 mL (535 to 1942) in the Floseal® group and 1103 mL (424 to 1711) in the placebo (p < 0.001, respectively). The TBL was similar between the Floseal® group and the placebo group (p = 0.819). No patients in any group had symptoms of venous thromboemblism. CONCLUSION: Our prospective randomized controlled study showed that intra-articular application of TXA was superior to hemostatic matrix (Floseal®) in terms of blood conservation in patients with preexisting thromboembolic risk undergoing minimally invasive TKA. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02865174) on 08/09/2016.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a thrombin-based hemostatic agent (Floseal®) on reducing postoperative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was still unclear. The aim of our study was to conduct a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the blood conservation effects of Floseal® and topical TXA in patients with preexisting thromboembolic risk undergoing primary minimally invasive TKA. METHODS: Our power analysis of this study was based upon the following description, to obtain a statistical power of 0.90 and an alpha error of 0.05, 30 patients were required in each group. Therefore, we enrolled a total of 103 patients with at least one of the risk factors for thromboembolism who underwent unilateral primary minimally invasive TKA, and the participants were randomly divided into the topical TXA group (n = 34), receiving intra-articular injection of 3 g of TXA in 100 mL saline after TKA, the topical Floseal® group (n = 34), receiving 10 mL of Floseal® intra-articularily during surgery, and the placebo group (n = 35), receiving an intra-articular saline injection only. The total blood loss (TBL) and hemoglobin (Hb) drop were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: The TXA group had a lower TBL of 645 mL (227 to 1090) in comparison with 1145 mL (535 to 1942) in the Floseal® group and 1103 mL (424 to 1711) in the placebo (p < 0.001, respectively). The TBL was similar between the Floseal® group and the placebo group (p = 0.819). No patients in any group had symptoms of venous thromboemblism. CONCLUSION: Our prospective randomized controlled study showed that intra-articular application of TXA was superior to hemostatic matrix (Floseal®) in terms of blood conservation in patients with preexisting thromboembolic risk undergoing minimally invasive TKA. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02865174) on 08/09/2016.
Authors: Andrew G Georgiadis; Stephanie J Muh; Craig D Silverton; Robb M Weir; Michael W Laker Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: X Aguilera; M J Martinez-Zapata; A Bosch; G Urrútia; J C González; M Jordan; I Gich; R M Maymó; N Martínez; J C Monllau; F Celaya; J A Fernández Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 5.284