OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) lesioning is a new treatment for brain disorders. However, the skull is a major barrier of ultrasound sonication in MRgFUS because it has an irregular surface and varies its size and shape among individuals. We recently developed the concept of skull density ratio (SDR) to select candidates for MRgFUS from among patients with essential tremor (ET). However, SDR is not the only factor contributing to successful MRgFUS lesioning treatment-refining the target through exact measurement of the ultrasonic echo in the transducer also improves treatment efficacy. In the present study, we carried out MRgFUS lesioning using an autofocusing echo imaging technique. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new approach, especially in patients with low SDR in whom previous focusing methods have failed. METHODS: From December 2019 to March 2020, we recruited 10 patients with ET or Parkinson's disease (PD) who had a low SDR. Two patients dropped out of the trial due to the screening failure of other medical diseases. In total, eight patients were included: six with ET who underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy and two with PD who underwent MRgFUS pallidotomy. The autofocusing echo imaging technique was used in all cases. RESULTS: The mean SDR of the patients with ET was 0.34 (range: 0.29-0.39), while that of the patients with PD was 0.41 (range: 0.38-0.44). The mean skull volume of patients with ET was 280.57 cm3 (range: 227-319 cm3), while that of the patients with PD was 287.13 cm3 (range: 271-303 cm3). During MRgFUS, a mean of 15 sonications were performed, among which a mean of 5.63 used the autofocusing technique. The mean maximal temperature (Tmax) achieved was 55.88°C (range: 52-59°C), while the mean energy delivered was 34.75 kJ (range: 20-42 kJ) among all patients. No serious adverse events occurred during or after treatment. Tmax or sonication factors (skull volume, SDR, sonication number, autofocusing score, similarity score, energy range, and power) were not correlated with autofocusing technique (p > 0.05, autofocusing score showed a p-value of 0.071). CONCLUSION: Using autofocusing echo imaging lesioning, a safe and efficient MRgFUS treatment, is available even for patients with a low SDR. Therefore, the indications for MRgFUS lesioning could be expanded to include patients with ET who have an SDR < 0.4 and those with PD who have an SDR < 0.45. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03935581.
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) lesioning is a new treatment for brain disorders. However, the skull is a major barrier of ultrasound sonication in MRgFUS because it has an irregular surface and varies its size and shape among individuals. We recently developed the concept of skull density ratio (SDR) to select candidates for MRgFUS from among patients with essential tremor (ET). However, SDR is not the only factor contributing to successful MRgFUS lesioning treatment-refining the target through exact measurement of the ultrasonic echo in the transducer also improves treatment efficacy. In the present study, we carried out MRgFUS lesioning using an autofocusing echo imaging technique. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new approach, especially in patients with low SDR in whom previous focusing methods have failed. METHODS: From December 2019 to March 2020, we recruited 10 patients with ET or Parkinson's disease (PD) who had a low SDR. Two patients dropped out of the trial due to the screening failure of other medical diseases. In total, eight patients were included: six with ET who underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy and two with PD who underwent MRgFUS pallidotomy. The autofocusing echo imaging technique was used in all cases. RESULTS: The mean SDR of the patients with ET was 0.34 (range: 0.29-0.39), while that of the patients with PD was 0.41 (range: 0.38-0.44). The mean skull volume of patients with ET was 280.57 cm3 (range: 227-319 cm3), while that of the patients with PD was 287.13 cm3 (range: 271-303 cm3). During MRgFUS, a mean of 15 sonications were performed, among which a mean of 5.63 used the autofocusing technique. The mean maximal temperature (Tmax) achieved was 55.88°C (range: 52-59°C), while the mean energy delivered was 34.75 kJ (range: 20-42 kJ) among all patients. No serious adverse events occurred during or after treatment. Tmax or sonication factors (skull volume, SDR, sonication number, autofocusing score, similarity score, energy range, and power) were not correlated with autofocusing technique (p > 0.05, autofocusing score showed a p-value of 0.071). CONCLUSION: Using autofocusing echo imaging lesioning, a safe and efficient MRgFUS treatment, is available even for patients with a low SDR. Therefore, the indications for MRgFUS lesioning could be expanded to include patients with ET who have an SDR < 0.4 and those with PD who have an SDR < 0.45. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03935581.
Authors: Aaron E Bond; Binit B Shah; Diane S Huss; Robert F Dallapiazza; Amy Warren; Madaline B Harrison; Scott A Sperling; Xin-Qun Wang; Ryder Gwinn; Jennie Witt; Susie Ro; W Jeffrey Elias Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Carmen Gasca-Salas; Pasqualina Guida; Rosanna Piredda; Ignacio Obeso; Lydia Vela Desojo; Raúl Martínez-Fernández; Frida Hernández-Fernández; Jorge Máñez-Miró; José A Pineda-Pardo; Marta Del Álamo; Rafael Rodriguez-Rojas; David Mata-Marín; Fernando Alonso-Frech; Esther de Luis; Jose Angel Obeso Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Raul Martínez-Fernández; Rafael Rodríguez-Rojas; Marta Del Álamo; Frida Hernández-Fernández; Jose A Pineda-Pardo; Michele Dileone; Fernando Alonso-Frech; Guglielmo Foffani; Ignacio Obeso; Carmen Gasca-Salas; Esther de Luis-Pastor; Lydia Vela; José A Obeso Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Daniel Jeanmonod; Beat Werner; Anne Morel; Lars Michels; Eyal Zadicario; Gilat Schiff; Ernst Martin Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Alexandre Boutet; Dave Gwun; Robert Gramer; Manish Ranjan; Gavin J B Elias; David Tilden; Yuexi Huang; Stanley Xiangyu Li; Benjamin Davidson; Hua Lu; Pascal Tyrrell; Ryan M Jones; Alfonso Fasano; Kullervo Hynynen; Walter Kucharczyk; Michael L Schwartz; Andres M Lozano Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: J Levi Chazen; Harini Sarva; Philip E Stieg; Robert J Min; Douglas J Ballon; Kane O Pryor; Paul M Riegelhaupt; Michael G Kaplitt Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Marc N Gallay; David Moser; Franziska Rossi; Payam Pourtehrani; Anouk E Magara; Milek Kowalski; Alexander Arnold; Daniel Jeanmonod Journal: J Ther Ultrasound Date: 2016-02-13
Authors: Hongchae Baek; Daniel Lockwood; Emily Jo Mason; Emmanuel Obusez; Matthew Poturalski; Richard Rammo; Sean J Nagel; Stephen E Jones Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Abdul-Kareem Ahmed; Sijia Guo; Nathaniel Kelm; Ryan Clanton; Elias R Melhem; Rao P Gullapalli; Alexander Ksendzovsky; Howard M Eisenberg; Timothy R Miller; Dheeraj Gandhi Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 4.003