Literature DB >> 33510607

Is Brain Dynamics Preserved in the EEG After Automated Artifact Removal? A Validation of the Fingerprint Method and the Automatic Removal of Cardiac Interference Approach Based on Microstate Analysis.

Gabriella Tamburro1,2, Pierpaolo Croce1, Filippo Zappasodi1,3, Silvia Comani1,2.   

Abstract

The assessment of a method for removing artifacts from electroencephalography (EEG) datasets often disregard verifying that global brain dynamics is preserved. In this study, we verified that the recently introduced optimized fingerprint method and the automatic removal of cardiac interference (ARCI) approach not only remove physiological artifacts from EEG recordings but also preserve global brain dynamics, as assessed with a new approach based on microstate analysis. We recorded EEG activity with a high-resolution EEG system during two resting-state conditions (eyes open, 25 volunteers, and eyes closed, 26 volunteers) known to exhibit different brain dynamics. After signal decomposition by independent component analysis (ICA), the independent components (ICs) related to eyeblinks, eye movements, myogenic interference, and cardiac electromechanical activity were identified with the optimized fingerprint method and ARCI approach and statistically compared with the outcome of the expert classification of the ICs by visual inspection. Brain dynamics in two different groups of denoised EEG signals, reconstructed after having removed the artifactual ICs identified by either visual inspection or the automated methods, was assessed by calculating microstate topographies, microstate metrics (duration, occurrence, and coverage), and directional predominance (based on transition probabilities). No statistically significant differences between the expert and the automated classification of the artifactual ICs were found (p > 0.05). Cronbach's α values assessed the high test-retest reliability of microstate parameters for EEG datasets denoised by the automated procedure. The total EEG signal variance explained by the sets of global microstate templates was about 80% for all denoised EEG datasets, with no significant differences between groups. For the differently denoised EEG datasets in the two recording conditions, we found that the global microstate templates and the sequences of global microstates were very similar (p < 0.01). Descriptive statistics and Cronbach's α of microstate metrics highlighted no significant differences and excellent consistency between groups (p > 0.5). These results confirm the ability of the optimized fingerprint method and the ARCI approach to effectively remove physiological artifacts from EEG recordings while preserving global brain dynamics. They also suggest that microstate analysis could represent a novel approach for assessing the ability of an EEG denoising method to remove artifacts without altering brain dynamics.
Copyright © 2021 Tamburro, Croce, Zappasodi and Comani.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARCI approach; EEG; ICA; artifact removal; microstate analysis; optimized fingerprint method

Year:  2021        PMID: 33510607      PMCID: PMC7835728          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.577160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  66 in total

1.  A tutorial on data-driven methods for statistically assessing ERP topographies.

Authors:  Thomas Koenig; Maria Stein; Matthias Grieder; Mara Kottlow
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Mobile EEG in epilepsy.

Authors:  Jessica Askamp; Michel J A M van Putten
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Feature-Less Automatic Classification of Independent Components in Multi-Channel Electrophysiological Brain Recordings.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Croce; Filippo Zappasodi; Laura Marzetti; Arcangelo Merla; Vittorio Pizzella; Antonio Maria Chiarelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Artifact removal in physiological signals--practices and possibilities.

Authors:  Kevin T Sweeney; Tomás E Ward; Seán F McLoone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2012-02-22

5.  An improved artifacts removal method for high dimensional EEG.

Authors:  Jidong Hou; Kyle Morgan; Don M Tucker; Amy Konyn; Catherine Poulsen; Yasuhiro Tanaka; Erik W Anderson; Phan Luu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Automated artifact removal as preprocessing refines neonatal seizure detection.

Authors:  M De Vos; W Deburchgraeve; P J Cherian; V Matic; R M Swarte; P Govaert; G H Visser; S Van Huffel
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Ocular reduction in EEG signals based on adaptive filtering, regression and blind source separation.

Authors:  S Romero; M A Mañanas; M J Barbanoj
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals.

Authors:  Irene Winkler; Stefan Haufe; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Automatic Removal of Physiological Artifacts in EEG: The Optimized Fingerprint Method for Sports Science Applications.

Authors:  David B Stone; Gabriella Tamburro; Patrique Fiedler; Jens Haueisen; Silvia Comani
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Online artifact removal for brain-computer interfaces using support vector machines and blind source separation.

Authors:  Sebastian Halder; Michael Bensch; Jürgen Mellinger; Martin Bogdan; Andrea Kübler; Niels Birbaumer; Wolfgang Rosenstiel
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2007
View more
  3 in total

1.  Open Eyes Increase Neural Oscillation and Enhance Effective Brain Connectivity of the Default Mode Network: Resting-State Electroencephalogram Research.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jialu Li; Lingjing Zeng; Haiteng Wang; Tianyi Yang; Yongcong Shao; Xiechuan Weng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Subject-Dependent Artifact Removal for Enhancing Motor Imagery Classifier Performance under Poor Skills.

Authors:  Mateo Tobón-Henao; Andrés Álvarez-Meza; Germán Castellanos-Domínguez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Test-Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI.

Authors:  Lan Yang; Jing Wei; Ying Li; Bin Wang; Hao Guo; Yanli Yang; Jie Xiang
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.