Jie Wang1, Alexander Jaramillo-Torres2, Yanxian Li2, Trond M Kortner2, Karina Gajardo2, Øyvind Jakobsen Brevik3, Jan Vidar Jakobsen4, Åshild Krogdahl2. 1. Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway. jie.wang@nmbu.no. 2. Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway. 3. Cermaq Group AS, Dronning Eufemias gate 16, 0191, Oslo, Norway. 4. Cargill Aqua Nutrition, Prof. Olav Hanssensvei 7A, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of the gut microbiota for health and wellbeing is well established for humans and some land animals. The gut microbiota is supposedly as important for fish, but existing knowledge has many gaps, in particular for fish in the Arctic areas. This study addressed the dynamics of Atlantic salmon digesta-associated gut microbiota assemblage and its associations with host responses from freshwater to seawater life stages under large-scale, commercial conditions in the Arctic region of Norway, and explored the effects of functional ingredients. The microbiota was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in distal intestinal digesta at four time points: 2 weeks before seawater transfer (in May, FW); 4 weeks after seawater transfer (in June, SW1); in November (SW2), and in April (SW3) the following year. Two series of diets were fed, varying throughout the observation time in nutrient composition according to the requirements of fish, one without (Ref diet), and the other with functional ingredients (Test diet). The functional ingredients, i.e. nucleotides, yeast cell walls, one prebiotic and essential fatty acids, were supplemented as single or mixtures based on the strategies from the feed company. RESULTS: Overall, the fish showed higher microbial richness and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) abundance after seawater transfer, while Simpson's diversity decreased throughout the observation period. At SW1, the gut microbiota was slightly different from those at FW, and was dominated by the genera Lactobacillus and Photobacterium. As the fish progressed towards SW2 and SW3, the genera Lactobacillus and Mycoplasma became more prominent, with a corresponding decline in genus Photobacterium. The overall bacterial profiles at these time points showed a clear distinction from those at FW. A significant effect of functional ingredients (a mixture of nucleotides, yeast cell walls and essential fatty acids) was observed at SW2, where Test-fed fish showed lower microbial richness, Shannon's diversity, and LAB abundance. The multivariate association analysis identified differentially abundant taxa, especially Megasphaera, to be significantly associated with gut immune and barrier gene expressions, and plasma nutrients. CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiota profile varied during the observation period, and the Mycoplasma became the dominating bacteria with time. Megasphaera abundance was associated with gut health and plasma nutrient biomarkers. Functional ingredients modulated the gut microbiota profile during an important ongrowing stage.
BACKGROUND: The importance of the gut microbiota for health and wellbeing is well established for humans and some land animals. The gut microbiota is supposedly as important for fish, but existing knowledge has many gaps, in particular for fish in the Arctic areas. This study addressed the dynamics of Atlantic salmon digesta-associated gut microbiota assemblage and its associations with host responses from freshwater to seawater life stages under large-scale, commercial conditions in the Arctic region of Norway, and explored the effects of functional ingredients. The microbiota was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in distal intestinal digesta at four time points: 2 weeks before seawater transfer (in May, FW); 4 weeks after seawater transfer (in June, SW1); in November (SW2), and in April (SW3) the following year. Two series of diets were fed, varying throughout the observation time in nutrient composition according to the requirements of fish, one without (Ref diet), and the other with functional ingredients (Test diet). The functional ingredients, i.e. nucleotides, yeast cell walls, one prebiotic and essential fatty acids, were supplemented as single or mixtures based on the strategies from the feed company. RESULTS: Overall, the fish showed higher microbial richness and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) abundance after seawater transfer, while Simpson's diversity decreased throughout the observation period. At SW1, the gut microbiota was slightly different from those at FW, and was dominated by the genera Lactobacillus and Photobacterium. As the fish progressed towards SW2 and SW3, the genera Lactobacillus and Mycoplasma became more prominent, with a corresponding decline in genus Photobacterium. The overall bacterial profiles at these time points showed a clear distinction from those at FW. A significant effect of functional ingredients (a mixture of nucleotides, yeast cell walls and essential fatty acids) was observed at SW2, where Test-fed fish showed lower microbial richness, Shannon's diversity, and LAB abundance. The multivariate association analysis identified differentially abundant taxa, especially Megasphaera, to be significantly associated with gut immune and barrier gene expressions, and plasma nutrients. CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiota profile varied during the observation period, and the Mycoplasma became the dominating bacteria with time. Megasphaera abundance was associated with gut health and plasma nutrient biomarkers. Functional ingredients modulated the gut microbiota profile during an important ongrowing stage.
Authors: Kamarul Zaman Zarkasi; Richard S Taylor; Guy C J Abell; Mark L Tamplin; Brett D Glencross; John P Bowman Journal: Microb Ecol Date: 2016-01-16 Impact factor: 4.552
Authors: Ivana Semova; Juliana D Carten; Jesse Stombaugh; Lantz C Mackey; Rob Knight; Steven A Farber; John F Rawls Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: K Z Zarkasi; G C J Abell; R S Taylor; C Neuman; E Hatje; M L Tamplin; M Katouli; J P Bowman Journal: J Appl Microbiol Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 3.772
Authors: Karina Gajardo; Ana Rodiles; Trond M Kortner; Åshild Krogdahl; Anne Marie Bakke; Daniel L Merrifield; Henning Sørum Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Karina Gajardo; Alexander Jaramillo-Torres; Trond M Kortner; Daniel L Merrifield; John Tinsley; Anne Marie Bakke; Åshild Krogdahl Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Alexander Jaramillo-Torres; Mark D Rawling; Ana Rodiles; Heidi E Mikalsen; Lill-Heidi Johansen; John Tinsley; Torunn Forberg; Elisabeth Aasum; Mathieu Castex; Daniel Lee Merrifield Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Carlos Muñoz; Josue González-Lorca; Mick Parra; Sarita Soto; Natalia Valdes; Ana María Sandino; Rodrigo Vargas; Alex González; Mario Tello Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 7.561