A D van Dijk1, F W Hoff2, Y H Qiu3, J Chandra4, E Jabbour3, E S J M de Bont2, T M Horton5, S M Kornblau3. 1. Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.d.van.dijk@umcg.nl. 2. Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute leukemia is an epigenetically heterogeneous disease. The intensity of treatment is currently guided by cytogenetic and molecular genetic risk classifications; however these incompletely predict outcomes, requiring additional information for more accurate outcome predictions. We aimed to identify potential prognostic implications of epigenetic modification of histone proteins, with a focus on H3K4 and H3K27 methylation marks in relation to mutations in chromatin, splicing and transcriptional regulators in adult-onset acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemia. RESULTS: Histone 3 lysine 4 di- and trimethylation (H3K4me2, H3K4me3) and lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) mark expression was evaluated in 241 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 114 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and 14T-cell ALL (T-ALL) patient samples at time of diagnosis using reverse phase protein array. Expression levels of the marks were significantly lower in AML than in B and T-ALL in both bone marrow and peripheral blood, as well as compared to normal CD34+ cells. In AML, greater loss of H3K27me3 was associated with increased proliferative potential and shorter overall survival in the whole patient population, as well as in subsets with DNA methylation mutations. To study the prognostic impact of H3K27me3 in the context of cytogenetic aberrations and mutations, multivariate analysis was performed and identified lower H3K27me3 level as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in all, as well as in TP53 mutated patients. AML with decreased H3K27me3 demonstrated an upregulated anti-apoptotic phenotype. In ALL, the relative quantity of histone methylation expression correlated with response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients who carried the Philadelphia cytogenetic aberration and prior smoking behavior. CONCLUSION: This study shows that proteomic profiling of epigenetic modifications has clinical implications in acute leukemia and supports the idea that epigenetic patterns contribute to a more accurate picture of the leukemic state that complements cytogenetic and molecular genetic subgrouping. A combination of these variables may offer more accurate outcome prediction and we suggest that histone methylation mark measurement at time of diagnosis might be a suitable method to improve patient outcome prediction and subsequent treatment intensity stratification in selected subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Acute leukemia is an epigenetically heterogeneous disease. The intensity of treatment is currently guided by cytogenetic and molecular genetic risk classifications; however these incompletely predict outcomes, requiring additional information for more accurate outcome predictions. We aimed to identify potential prognostic implications of epigenetic modification of histone proteins, with a focus on H3K4 and H3K27 methylation marks in relation to mutations in chromatin, splicing and transcriptional regulators in adult-onset acute lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemia. RESULTS: Histone 3 lysine 4 di- and trimethylation (H3K4me2, H3K4me3) and lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) mark expression was evaluated in 241 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 114 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and 14T-cell ALL (T-ALL) patient samples at time of diagnosis using reverse phase protein array. Expression levels of the marks were significantly lower in AML than in B and T-ALL in both bone marrow and peripheral blood, as well as compared to normal CD34+ cells. In AML, greater loss of H3K27me3 was associated with increased proliferative potential and shorter overall survival in the whole patient population, as well as in subsets with DNA methylation mutations. To study the prognostic impact of H3K27me3 in the context of cytogenetic aberrations and mutations, multivariate analysis was performed and identified lower H3K27me3 level as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in all, as well as in TP53 mutated patients. AML with decreased H3K27me3 demonstrated an upregulated anti-apoptotic phenotype. In ALL, the relative quantity of histone methylation expression correlated with response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients who carried the Philadelphia cytogenetic aberration and prior smoking behavior. CONCLUSION: This study shows that proteomic profiling of epigenetic modifications has clinical implications in acute leukemia and supports the idea that epigenetic patterns contribute to a more accurate picture of the leukemic state that complements cytogenetic and molecular genetic subgrouping. A combination of these variables may offer more accurate outcome prediction and we suggest that histone methylation mark measurement at time of diagnosis might be a suitable method to improve patient outcome prediction and subsequent treatment intensity stratification in selected subgroups.
Authors: Pooja Panwalkar; Jonathan Clark; Vijay Ramaswamy; Debra Hawes; Fusheng Yang; Christopher Dunham; Stephen Yip; Juliette Hukin; Yilun Sun; Matthew J Schipper; Lukas Chavez; Ashley Margol; Melike Pekmezci; Chan Chung; Adam Banda; Jill M Bayliss; Sarah J Curry; Mariarita Santi; Fausto J Rodriguez; Matija Snuderl; Matthias A Karajannis; Amanda M Saratsis; Craig M Horbinski; Anne-Sophie Carret; Beverly Wilson; Donna Johnston; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Shayna Zelcer; David Eisenstat; Marianna Silva; Katrin Scheinemann; Nada Jabado; P Daniel McNeely; Marcel Kool; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Andrey Korshunov; Alexander R Judkins; Sriram Venneti Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Jindan Yu; Jianjun Yu; Daniel R Rhodes; Scott A Tomlins; Xuhong Cao; Guoan Chen; Rohit Mehra; Xiaoju Wang; Debashis Ghosh; Rajal B Shah; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Kenneth J Pienta; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Arjen H G Cleven; Ghadah A Al Sannaa; Inge Briaire-de Bruijn; Davis R Ingram; Matt van de Rijn; Brian P Rubin; Maurits W de Vries; Kelsey L Watson; Keila E Torres; Wei-Lien Wang; Sjoerd G van Duinen; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Alexander J Lazar; Judith V M G Bovée Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Steven M Kornblau; Raoul Tibes; Yi Hua Qiu; Wenjing Chen; Hagop M Kantarjian; Michael Andreeff; Kevin R Coombes; Gordon B Mills Journal: Blood Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Haley E Ramsey; Melissa A Fischer; Taekyu Lee; Agnieszka E Gorska; Maria Pia Arrate; Londa Fuller; Kelli L Boyd; Stephen A Strickland; John Sensintaffar; Leah J Hogdal; Gregory D Ayers; Edward T Olejniczak; Stephen W Fesik; Michael R Savona Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: C W Hu; Y Qiu; A Ligeralde; A Y Raybon; S Y Yoo; K R Coombes; A A Qutub; S M Kornblau Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Noortje van Gils; Han J M P Verhagen; Michaël Broux; Tania Martiáñez; Fedor Denkers; Eline Vermue; Arjo Rutten; Tamás Csikós; Sofie Demeyer; Meryem Çil; Marjon Al; Jan Cools; Jeroen J W M Janssen; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Renee X Menezes; Linda Smit Journal: iScience Date: 2022-08-25