Claus L Andersen1, Jesper B Bramsen2, Trine B Mattesen3. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. Cla@clin.au.dk. 2. Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. Bramsen@clin.au.dk. 3. Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcriptional analysis is widely used to study the molecular biology of cancer and hold great biomarker potential for clinical patient stratification. Yet, accurate transcriptional profiling requires RNA of a high quality, which often cannot be retrieved from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue that is routinely collected and archived in clinical departments. To overcome this roadblock to clinical testing, we previously developed MethCORR, a method that infers gene expression from DNA methylation data, which is robustly retrieved from FFPE tissue. MethCORR was originally developed for colorectal cancer and with this study, we aim to: (1) extend the MethCORR method to 10 additional cancer types and (2) to illustrate that the inferred gene expression is accurate and clinically informative. RESULTS: Regression models to infer gene expression information from DNA methylation were developed for ten common cancer types using matched RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiles (HumanMethylation450 BeadChip) from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. Robust and accurate gene expression profiles were inferred for all cancer types: on average, the expression of 11,000 genes was modeled with good accuracy and an intra-sample correlation of R2 = 0.90 between inferred and measured gene expression was observed. Molecular pathway analysis and transcriptional subtyping were performed for breast, prostate, and lung cancer samples to illustrate the general usability of the inferred gene expression profiles: overall, a high correlation of r = 0.96 (Pearson) in pathway enrichment scores and a 76% correspondence in molecular subtype calls were observed when using measured and inferred gene expression as input. Finally, inferred expression from FFPE tissue correlated better with RNA sequencing data from matched fresh-frozen tissue than did RNA sequencing data from FFPE tissue (P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). CONCLUSIONS: In all cancers investigated, MethCORR enabled DNA methylation-based transcriptional analysis, thus enabling future analysis of cancer in situations where high-quality DNA, but not RNA, is available. Here, we provide the framework and resources for MethCORR modeling of ten common cancer types, thereby widely expanding the possibilities for transcriptional studies of archival FFPE material.
BACKGROUND: Transcriptional analysis is widely used to study the molecular biology of cancer and hold great biomarker potential for clinical patient stratification. Yet, accurate transcriptional profiling requires RNA of a high quality, which often cannot be retrieved from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue that is routinely collected and archived in clinical departments. To overcome this roadblock to clinical testing, we previously developed MethCORR, a method that infers gene expression from DNA methylation data, which is robustly retrieved from FFPE tissue. MethCORR was originally developed for colorectal cancer and with this study, we aim to: (1) extend the MethCORR method to 10 additional cancer types and (2) to illustrate that the inferred gene expression is accurate and clinically informative. RESULTS: Regression models to infer gene expression information from DNA methylation were developed for ten common cancer types using matched RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiles (HumanMethylation450 BeadChip) from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. Robust and accurate gene expression profiles were inferred for all cancer types: on average, the expression of 11,000 genes was modeled with good accuracy and an intra-sample correlation of R2 = 0.90 between inferred and measured gene expression was observed. Molecular pathway analysis and transcriptional subtyping were performed for breast, prostate, and lung cancer samples to illustrate the general usability of the inferred gene expression profiles: overall, a high correlation of r = 0.96 (Pearson) in pathway enrichment scores and a 76% correspondence in molecular subtype calls were observed when using measured and inferred gene expression as input. Finally, inferred expression from FFPE tissue correlated better with RNA sequencing data from matched fresh-frozen tissue than did RNA sequencing data from FFPE tissue (P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). CONCLUSIONS: In all cancers investigated, MethCORR enabled DNA methylation-based transcriptional analysis, thus enabling future analysis of cancer in situations where high-quality DNA, but not RNA, is available. Here, we provide the framework and resources for MethCORR modeling of ten common cancer types, thereby widely expanding the possibilities for transcriptional studies of archival FFPE material.
Authors: Mary J Goldman; Brian Craft; Mim Hastie; Kristupas Repečka; Fran McDade; Akhil Kamath; Ayan Banerjee; Yunhai Luo; Dave Rogers; Angela N Brooks; Jingchun Zhu; David Haussler Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Wendell Jones; Sarah Greytak; Hana Odeh; Ping Guan; Jason Powers; Jasmin Bavarva; Helen M Moore Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Joon-Yong Chung; Till Braunschweig; Reginald Williams; Natalie Guerrero; Karl M Hoffmann; Mijung Kwon; Young K Song; Steven K Libutti; Stephen M Hewitt Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Matthew D Wilkerson; Xiaoying Yin; Vonn Walter; Ni Zhao; Christopher R Cabanski; Michele C Hayward; C Ryan Miller; Mark A Socinski; Alden M Parsons; Leigh B Thorne; Benjamin E Haithcock; Nirmal K Veeramachaneni; William K Funkhouser; Scott H Randell; Philip S Bernard; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kosuke Yoshihara; Maria Shahmoradgoli; Emmanuel Martínez; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Hoon Kim; Wandaliz Torres-Garcia; Victor Treviño; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Douglas A Levine; Scott L Carter; Gad Getz; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Gordon B Mills; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Anna Yakovleva; Jordan L Plieskatt; Sarah Jensen; Razan Humeida; Jonathan Lang; Guangzhao Li; Paige Bracci; Sylvia Silver; Jeffrey Michael Bethony Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jianfang Liu; Tara Lichtenberg; Katherine A Hoadley; Laila M Poisson; Alexander J Lazar; Andrew D Cherniack; Albert J Kovatich; Christopher C Benz; Douglas A Levine; Adrian V Lee; Larsson Omberg; Denise M Wolf; Craig D Shriver; Vesteinn Thorsson; Hai Hu Journal: Cell Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 41.582