Literature DB >> 33509246

Experience with periprosthetic infection after limb salvage surgery for patients with osteosarcoma.

Tiao Lin1,2, Qinglin Jin1,2, Xiaolin Mo3, Zhiqiang Zhao1,2, Xianbiao Xie1,2, Changye Zou1,2, Gang Huang1,2, Junqiang Yin4,5, Jingnan Shen6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of postoperative infection developing is higher after limb salvage surgery (LSS) following sarcoma resection compared with conventional arthroplasty. The goal of this study is to summarize our experience in management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the risk factors of early PJI after LSS.
METHODS: Between January 2010 and July 2019, 53 patients with osteosarcoma in the lower extremities who encountered periprosthetic infection after segmental tumor endoprosthetic replacement in our center were analyzed. Detailed patient characteristics and therapeutic information were collected from database of our institution or follow-up data and we divided patients according to the interval time between infection and tumor resection (surgery-infection interval) and investigate potential risk factors.
RESULTS: A total of 53 (5.08%) patients were suffered postoperative infection. The average interval between surgery and clinical signs of deep infections are 27.5 days. For the drainage culture, positive results were only presented in 11 patients (20.8%). Almost half of this study's (47.2%) patients underwent a traditional two-stage revision, that was, after the removal of the infected prosthesis, we applied antibiotic-loaded bone cements as a spacer. The mean blood loss during initial implantation surgery and operation time both correlated with interval period between PJI and initial implantation significantly (P = 0.028, P = 0.046). For several patients which infection marker was hardly back to normal after spacer implantation, we conservatively introduced an improved combination of bone cement and prosthesis for the second-stage surgery (5.6%). There were six patients needing re-operation, of which three were due to the aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, one developed periprosthetic infection again, and two patients encountered local recurrence and underwent amputation. Two patients were dead from distal metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: A two-stage revision strategy remains effective and standardized methods for PJI patients. Total operation time and blood loss during LSS of osteosarcoma are the main risk factors of early PJI. For the patients without confirmed eradiation of microorganisms, an improved combination of bone cement and prosthesis applied in the second-stage surgery could achieve satisfied functional and oncologic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Limb salvage surgery; Osteosarcoma; Periprosthetic joint infection; Revision; Risk factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33509246      PMCID: PMC7844921          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02243-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.677


  27 in total

1.  Reduction of periprosthetic infection with silver-coated megaprostheses in patients with bone sarcoma.

Authors:  Jendrik Hardes; Christof von Eiff; Arne Streitbuerger; Maurice Balke; Tymoteus Budny; Marcel P Henrichs; Gregor Hauschild; Helmut Ahrens
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Complications and survival of megaprostheses after resection of bone metastases.

Authors:  M De Gori; A D’Arienzo; L Andreani; G Beltrami; D A Campanacci; P De Biase; F Frenos; S Giannotti; F Sacchetti; F Totti; P Parchi; R Capanna
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec,       Impact factor: 1.711

4.  Periprosthetic infection in patients treated for an orthopaedic oncological condition.

Authors:  L M Jeys; R J Grimer; S R Carter; R M Tillman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Postoperative infection and survival in osteosarcoma patients: Reconsideration of immunotherapy for osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Y U Chen; Song-Feng Xu; Ming Xu; Xiu-Chun Yu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-09

6.  The worst-case scenario: treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture with coexistent periprosthetic infection-a prospective and consecutive clinical study.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Tobias Winkler; Sven Märdian; Andrej Trampuz; Nora Renz; Carsten Perka; Daniel Karczewski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  J Ritter; S S Bielack
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Chemical functionalization of bone implants with nanoparticle-stabilized chitosan and methotrexate for inhibiting both osteoclastoma formation and bacterial infection.

Authors:  Li-Hua Li; Mei Li; Dan Li; Peng He; Hong Xia; Yu Zhang; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Connor Cross; Mark J Kransdorf; F Spencer Chivers; Roxanne Lorans; Catherine C Roberts; Adam J Schwartz; Christopher P Beauchamp
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Fighting Megaprosthetic Infections: What are the Chances of Winning?

Authors:  Manit K Gundavda; Ameya Katariya; Rajeev Reddy; Manish G Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.033

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cutaneous diphtheria complicated oncologic reconstruction surgery in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Babak Abdolkarimi; Ali Amanati; Gholamreza Bahoush Mehdiabadi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.