Literature DB >> 33509208

Reliability of streetscape audits comparing on-street and online observations: MAPS-Global in 5 countries.

Ana Queralt1,2, Javier Molina-García3, Marta Terrón-Pérez4,5, Ester Cerin6,7, Anthony Barnett6, Anna Timperio8, Jenny Veitch8, Rodrigo Reis9, Alexandre Augusto Paula Silva10,11, Ariane Ghekiere12,13,14, Delfien Van Dyck14,15, Terry L Conway16, Kelli L Cain6,16, Carrie M Geremia16, James F Sallis6,16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microscale environmental features are usually evaluated using direct on-street observations. This study assessed inter-rater reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes, Global version (MAPS-Global), in an international context, comparing on-street with more efficient online observation methods in five countries with varying levels of walkability.
METHODS: Data were collected along likely walking routes of study participants, from residential starting points toward commercial clusters in Melbourne (Australia), Ghent (Belgium), Curitiba (Brazil), Hong Kong (China), and Valencia (Spain). In-person on the street and online using Google Street View audits were carried out by two independent trained raters in each city. The final sample included 349 routes, 1228 street segments, 799 crossings, and 16 cul-de-sacs. Inter-rater reliability analyses were performed using Kappa statistics or Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC).
RESULTS: Overall mean assessment times were the same for on-street and online evaluations (22 ± 12 min). Only a few subscales had Kappa or ICC values < 0.70, with aesthetic and social environment variables having the lowest overall reliability values, though still in the "good to excellent" category. Overall scores for each section (route, segment, crossing) showed good to excellent reliability (ICCs: 0.813, 0.929 and 0.885, respectively), and the MAPS-Global grand score had excellent reliability (ICC: 0.861) between the two methods.
CONCLUSIONS: MAPS-Global is a feasible and reliable instrument that can be used both on-street and online to analyze microscale environmental characteristics in diverse international urban settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Built environment; Direct observation; Measurement; Neighborhood; Physical activity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33509208      PMCID: PMC7844998          DOI: 10.1186/s12942-021-00261-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Geogr        ISSN: 1476-072X            Impact factor:   3.918


  26 in total

1.  The precision of reliability and validity estimates re-visited: distinguishing between clinical and statistical significance of sample size requirements.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Can virtual streetscape audits reliably replace physical streetscape audits?

Authors:  Hannah M Badland; Simon Opit; Karen Witten; Robin A Kearns; Suzanne Mavoa
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth: a commentary.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Wilson; Cheryl M Kelly
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes.

Authors:  James F Sallis; Donald J Slymen; Terry L Conway; Lawrence D Frank; Brian E Saelens; Kelli Cain; James E Chapman
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Wilson; Cheryl M Kelly; Mario Schootman; Elizabeth A Baker; Aniruddha Banerjee; Morgan Clennin; Douglas K Miller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Using an audit tool (MAPS Global) to assess the characteristics of the physical environment related to walking for transport in youth: reliability of Belgian data.

Authors:  Griet Vanwolleghem; Ariane Ghekiere; Greet Cardon; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Sara D'Haese; Carrie M Geremia; Matthieu Lenoir; James F Sallis; Hannah Verhoeven; Delfien Van Dyck
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods.

Authors:  Christine B Phillips; Jessa K Engelberg; Carrie M Geremia; Wenfei Zhu; Jonathan M Kurka; Kelli L Cain; James F Sallis; Terry L Conway; Marc A Adams
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  Developing and testing a street audit tool using Google Street View to measure environmental supportiveness for physical activity.

Authors:  Pippa Griew; Melvyn Hillsdon; Charlie Foster; Emma Coombes; Andy Jones; Paul Wilkinson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Development and reliability of a streetscape observation instrument for international use: MAPS-global.

Authors:  Kelli L Cain; Carrie M Geremia; Terry L Conway; Lawrence D Frank; James E Chapman; Eric H Fox; Anna Timperio; Jenny Veitch; Delfien Van Dyck; Hannah Verhoeven; Rodrigo Reis; Alexandre Augusto; Ester Cerin; Robin R Mellecker; Ana Queralt; Javier Molina-García; James F Sallis
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Different neighborhood walkability indexes for active commuting to school are necessary for urban and rural children and adolescents.

Authors:  Javier Molina-García; Sergio Campos; Xavier García-Massó; Manuel Herrador-Colmenero; Patricia Gálvez-Fernández; Daniel Molina-Soberanes; Ana Queralt; Palma Chillón
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.